On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 09:19:04AM -0800, Ted Gould wrote:
> Yes, but that HAL patch ignores all battery entries in /proc if it finds
> one in /sys. Which seems rather risky to me... but I was curious if
> that seems logical to those who know the kernel better.
Yes, the only way a battery can en
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 08:55 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Ted Gould [2008-02-19 14:31 -0800]:
> > So, here is the bug:
> >
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/177570
> >
> > Basically with the .24 kernel there are sysfs and proc interfaces for
> > many batteries m
Hi Ted,
Ted Gould [2008-02-19 14:31 -0800]:
> So, here is the bug:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/177570
>
> Basically with the .24 kernel there are sysfs and proc interfaces for
> many batteries making it so that HAL reports two, and thus GPM reports
> tw
So, here is the bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/177570
Basically with the .24 kernel there are sysfs and proc interfaces for
many batteries making it so that HAL reports two, and thus GPM reports
two. There is a link to a patch in upstream HAL that fixes t
