Re: Our best foot forward

2007-11-25 Thread Neal McBurnett
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 01:46:03AM +, (``-_-´´) -- Fernando wrote: > On Monday 19 November 2007 12:41:35 Sebastian Heinlein wrote: > > Am Sonntag, den 18.11.2007, 08:34 -0500 schrieb Patrick: > > > I see it now. I never noticed it there. Is there any reason it cannot > > > also be placed under

Re: Our best foot forward

2007-11-25 Thread (``-_-´´) -- Fernando
On Thursday 15 November 2007 03:30:06 Patrick wrote: > Hi Onno and list > Let me try one more time. > > I think these topics are "package centric" > 1)Question=I want to install a cd burning utility > Answer=Synaptic multi-media section or type in cd burning utility in > Synaptic search bar. > >

Re: Our best foot forward

2007-11-25 Thread (``-_-´´) -- Fernando
On Monday 19 November 2007 12:41:35 Sebastian Heinlein wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 18.11.2007, 08:34 -0500 schrieb Patrick: > > I see it now. I never noticed it there. Is there any reason it cannot > > also be placed under the right click too?-Patrick > > I don't think that this is a very often need

Re: Our best foot forward

2007-11-25 Thread (``-_-´´) -- Fernando
Onno Benschop wrote: > All of what you write exists: >     * You can view tasks in Synaptic by choosing Edit -> Mark Packages  by > Task... I've been using Ubuntu since 6.10 and didnt know about this, lol I've used a similar command from the shell, but never from the Synaptic. Thanks, will com in

Re: Our best foot forward

2007-11-21 Thread Markus Hitter
Am 21.11.2007 um 02:52 schrieb Jan Claeys: > but an easy-to-use GUI will often make it easier to have an > insecure system as > a result. Preventing this from happening is maybe possible, but > certainly not easy! I don't buy this argument. Well made GUI's contain a lot of knowledge, more

Re: Our best foot forward

2007-11-20 Thread Martin Owens
> It uses the web because we shouldn't require servers to have the huge > set of (potentially dangerous) packages that are needed for X11 and > Gnome or KDE. Those web configuration tools though, they're a bit podgy and the designers tend not to have the widgets they need to do a good enough job.

Re: Our best foot forward

2007-11-20 Thread Neal McBurnett
ve to search on the > net for this information. I don't really know what to call it but > perhaps a Q & A / interactive tutorial utility could provide quick > guidance to new users. It could help them through these topics > quickly and we could put our best foot forward.

Re: Our best foot forward

2007-11-20 Thread Jan Claeys
Op maandag 19-11-2007 om 19:50 uur [tijdzone -0500], schreef Patrick: > The problem is it's not obvious to the first time user. I could carry > out usability studies with friends and family but really I don't think > anyone is ready to set up an nfs, ftp or samba server in the first > 10-20 hours.

Re: Our best foot forward

2007-11-20 Thread Sebastian Heinlein
Am Dienstag, den 20.11.2007, 08:51 -0500 schrieb Patrick: > Hi Sebastian > > That sounds like a good idea! > > I would like to help. Do you have a rough estimate as to when the web > based Synaptic will be ready? No, at first it needs some skilled web developers :) signature.asc Description:

Re: Our best foot forward

2007-11-20 Thread Patrick
Hi Sebastian That sounds like a good idea! I would like to help. Do you have a rough estimate as to when the web based Synaptic will be ready? Sebastian Heinlein wrote: > Am Montag, den 19.11.2007, 22:47 -0500 schrieb Patrick: > >> The post installation scripts should be divided up between >

Re: Our best foot forward

2007-11-20 Thread Sebastian Heinlein
Am Montag, den 19.11.2007, 22:47 -0500 schrieb Patrick: > > The post installation scripts should be divided up between > programmers > and tutorial writers. Post-installation scripts should not contain any things that are not related to installing the package, since they have to robust. Further

Re: Our best foot forward

2007-11-19 Thread randall
Patrick wrote: > indeed I am unsure of how to contribute. > > It would seem that I could take the prize for both the longest and most > poorly written emails as the feedback I am receiving is disconnected > from the message I was sending. > > To summarize my long winded emails: > > Ubuntu is the

Re: Our best foot forward

2007-11-19 Thread Patrick
indeed I am unsure of how to contribute. It would seem that I could take the prize for both the longest and most poorly written emails as the feedback I am receiving is disconnected from the message I was sending. To summarize my long winded emails: Ubuntu is the ultimate OS for the power user

Re: Our best foot forward

2007-11-19 Thread Matthew Paul Thomas
On Nov 20, 2007, at 1:50 PM, Patrick wrote: ... We should be putting forth what Ubuntu can do that Windows cannot. It is the ability to set up so many services and customize so many things that makes it amazing. Most of this still needs to be done at the terminal though. People need to be able

Re: Our best foot forward

2007-11-19 Thread Patrick
-Ubuntu documentation is so much better then it used to be, I don't think it is lacking in terms of the casual user. -I am not having trouble searching for documentation. -These usability tests are nice but not quite applicable to the concerns I have. -

Re: Our best foot forward

2007-11-19 Thread Matthew Paul Thomas
On Nov 20, 2007, at 2:19 AM, Patrick wrote: ... It would be much better if the "configure" option would take care of this and perhaps the "help and support" area search results provided specific links to useful Ubuntu specific online information. I am disappointed that my efforts have come to no

Re: Our best foot forward

2007-11-19 Thread Patrick
I spent several hours last week writing emails regarding making improvements to how packages are configured and how tutorials are done. I realize now that writing "helper scripts" that would be a hybrid of an installation script and a tutorial might not be the best way to get the job done. It

Re: Our best foot forward

2007-11-19 Thread Sebastian Heinlein
Am Sonntag, den 18.11.2007, 08:34 -0500 schrieb Patrick: > I see it now. I never noticed it there. Is there any reason it cannot > also be placed under the right click too?-Patrick I don't think that this is a very often needed feature. We want to keep the menu short. signature.asc Description:

Re: Our best foot forward

2007-11-18 Thread Patrick
I see it now. I never noticed it there. Is there any reason it cannot also be placed under the right click too?-Patrick Sebastian Heinlein wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2007, 11:36 +0900 schrieb Onno Benschop: > >> All of what you write exists: >> > > >> * To reconfigure a pack

Re: Our best foot forward

2007-11-18 Thread Sebastian Heinlein
Am Mittwoch, den 14.11.2007, 06:47 -0500 schrieb Patrick: > #!/bin/bash > > echo "we need to do such and such, here are some options to try, blah, > blah, blah etc" > > sudo gedit /etc/exports > > echo "okay now we need to do this because blah blah" > > sudo exportfs -ra > > sudo /etc/init.d

Re: Our best foot forward

2007-11-18 Thread Sebastian Heinlein
Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2007, 11:36 +0900 schrieb Onno Benschop: > All of what you write exists: > * To reconfigure a package: sudo dpkg-reconfigure foobar, perhaps it > would be useful to add this functionality to Synaptic. This feature exists already for years. Select a corresponding

Re: Our best foot forward

2007-11-15 Thread Onno Benschop
On 15/11/07 22:55, Patrick wrote: > Has Canonical carried out studies with new users of different technical > abilities? This might be a good thing to do. After a Newbie installs > Ubuntu where do they go first? How is their experience in the first > hour. To woe Windows users I think the first

Re: Our best foot forward

2007-11-15 Thread Patrick
but I don't see >> an easy solution for the new user for the configuration centric" >> questions. Having the dpkg-reconfigure option built into Synaptic would >> help a lot but it would not solve question #4. A utility to provide >> answers and helper scripts for c

Re: Our best foot forward

2007-11-14 Thread Sarah Hobbs
How much of all this tutorial stuff is already in the man pages? Hobbsee -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss

Re: Our best foot forward

2007-11-14 Thread Emmet Hikory
On 11/15/07, Sarah Hobbs wrote: > How much of all this tutorial stuff is already in the man pages? The manual pages contain vast amounts of detail, but I'm not sure they provide the overview for some of the more general questions. Further, I'm fairly certain that most complex tasks are not wel

Re: Our best foot forward

2007-11-14 Thread Patrick
of this to happen. It should not happen in the man pages and it would be nice if people did not have to search on the net for this information. I don't really know what to call it but perhaps a Q & A / interactive tutorial utility could provide quick guidance to new users. It could he

Re: Our best foot forward

2007-11-14 Thread Onno Benschop
All of what you write exists: * A package that is not installed but run from the bash prompt is captured with a comment like "The program 'foobar' is currently not installed. You can install it by typing: sudo apt-get install foobar" This functionality should be instal

Re: Our best foot forward

2007-11-14 Thread Onno Benschop
On 15/11/07 09:07, Patrick wrote: > Hi Onno and List > > I am not sure I have made my intentions clear. First of all, Ubuntu's > package management system is easier and less hazardous then a > windoze-one-click-installer program, my helper script idea was just to > focus on the configuration and

Re: Our best foot forward

2007-11-14 Thread Patrick
I see where you are going with this and I will make a bug report if I encounter this sort of trouble again. I hope I am not "beating this to death now" but I need to continue. Being a dumbass I have another perspective to offer. Early on I encountered these post installation questions but I did

Re: Our best foot forward

2007-11-14 Thread Patrick
battle the whole time and there are probably more people like me then there are like the people on this list. Although Linux is growing in popularity it is a slow burn. It is a great OS and it should be a raging fire by now. Vista sales are in the billions, it's just not right. We need to put

Re: Our best foot forward

2007-11-14 Thread Onno Benschop
On 15/11/07 02:51, Patrick wrote: > Hi Eoin and list > > I agree that shell scripts are not for beginners. Really I think Ubuntu > is already really good for the beginners, although a different bred of > OS , I don't see what is more difficult then let's say windoze. However > for a beginner adm

Re: Our best foot forward

2007-11-14 Thread Patrick
Hi Eoin and list I agree that shell scripts are not for beginners. Really I think Ubuntu is already really good for the beginners, although a different bred of OS , I don't see what is more difficult then let's say windoze. However for a beginner administrator, let's say someone who is trying t

Re: Our best foot forward

2007-11-14 Thread Eoin Rogers
On 14/11/2007, Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So my suggestion is a > halfway point between the "hand-holding" of the GUI and the sometimes > confusing world of the CLI. IMO, beginners like the hand-holding. It's vital for Ubuntu not to get confusing for the end-user. Getting them to run

Our best foot forward

2007-11-14 Thread Patrick
Hi Everyone This is my first post here. It seems to me that me that if an administration job needs to get done there are pretty much two ways of going about it: With GUI assistance, i.e Synaptic or Through the Command line with possible manual editing of configuration files. Synaptic and it'