Re: karmic trashed in Tomshardware.com

2009-12-08 Thread Chris Cheney
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 22:53 -0600, Chris Cheney wrote: > On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 17:13 -0600, Patrick Goetz wrote: > > I've been out of the loop for a couple of months, so pardon me if this > > has already been discussed, but Karmic got thoroughly trashed in a > > TomsHardware.com review: > > > >

Re: karmic trashed in Tomshardware.com

2009-12-08 Thread Chris Cheney
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 17:13 -0600, Patrick Goetz wrote: > I've been out of the loop for a couple of months, so pardon me if this > has already been discussed, but Karmic got thoroughly trashed in a > TomsHardware.com review: > >http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ubuntu-karmic-koala,2484.htm

Re: karmic trashed in Tomshardware.com

2009-12-08 Thread Dan Trevino
I like how they blamed the software center UI for repo slowness. Clearly a well thought out article. Dan --- Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Open Standards! Sent from Gainesville, FL, United States On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Patrick Goetz wrote: > I've been out of the loop for a couple o

Re: karmic trashed in Tomshardware.com

2009-12-08 Thread Markus Hitter
Am 08.12.2009 um 11:03 schrieb James Hogarth: > Given these were desktops the possible loss in FS reliability on > crash is an acceptable tradeoff Neither crashes nor less than 100% file system reliabilty are acceptable. Never ever. An operating system isn't a children's playground. Mark

Re: karmic trashed in Tomshardware.com

2009-12-08 Thread James Hogarth
Well over here carried out 2 upgrades and 2 fresh installs so far. Couple of minor issues but nothing bug worthy. We use nVidia cards and dual monitors - had the 'cannot parse xorg.conf' documented issue when configuring twinview (simple enough to sort out). Also had an issue with filesystem perfor

Re: karmic trashed in Tomshardware.com

2009-12-07 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 11:07 +0800, Tim Hawkins wrote: > I dont know if it is relevant, but looking at the specs of the two > "unstable" machines listed in the article, both had nVidia chipsets > > The one machine (netbook) that they said worked perfectly had an Intel > Graphics chipset. > > Gi

Re: karmic trashed in Tomshardware.com

2009-12-07 Thread Daniel Chen
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Tim Hawkins wrote: > Given the amount of discussion relating to problems with the nVidia drivers > in Karmic, could this be a factor in this review.? Given the number of bugs filed incorrectly against the Ubuntu PulseAudio source package involving proprietary grap

Re: karmic trashed in Tomshardware.com

2009-12-07 Thread Tim Hawkins
I dont know if it is relevant, but looking at the specs of the two "unstable" machines listed in the article, both had nVidia chipsets The one machine (netbook) that they said worked perfectly had an Intel Graphics chipset. Given the amount of discussion relating to problems with the nVidia dr

Re: karmic trashed in Tomshardware.com

2009-12-07 Thread Shentino
Indeed this list lately has been buzzing somewhat with grumpy messages regarding Karmic's bellyflop. I must admit that some of mine could have been a bit less condescending than they were. On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Patrick Goetz wrote: > I've been out of the loop for a couple of months, so