Re: man types.h

2013-01-18 Thread Lanoxx
On 18/01/13 14:57, Colin Watson wrote: On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 02:05:47PM +0100, Lanoxx wrote: On 17/01/13 13:40, Oliver Grawert wrote: Am Donnerstag, den 17.01.2013, 13:11 +0100 schrieb Lanoxx: it seems that for solaris there exists a man page for types.h [1] but I could not find such a man

Re: man types.h

2013-01-18 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 02:05:47PM +0100, Lanoxx wrote: > On 17/01/13 13:40, Oliver Grawert wrote: > >Am Donnerstag, den 17.01.2013, 13:11 +0100 schrieb Lanoxx: > >>it seems that for solaris there exists a man page for types.h [1] but I > >>could not find such a man page on ubuntu. Could someone gi

Re: man types.h

2013-01-17 Thread Lanoxx
On 17/01/13 13:40, Oliver Grawert wrote: hi, Am Donnerstag, den 17.01.2013, 13:11 +0100 schrieb Lanoxx: Hi, it seems that for solaris there exists a man page for types.h [1] but I could not find such a man page on ubuntu. Could someone give me a hint, why it does not exist or is the man page n

Re: man types.h

2013-01-17 Thread Oliver Grawert
hi, Am Donnerstag, den 17.01.2013, 13:11 +0100 schrieb Lanoxx: > Hi, > > it seems that for solaris there exists a man page for types.h [1] but I > could not find such a man page on ubuntu. Could someone give me a hint, > why it does not exist or is the man page name just different on ubuntu? >

Re: man types.h

2013-01-17 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 01:11:49PM +0100, Lanoxx wrote: > it seems that for solaris there exists a man page for types.h [1] > but I could not find such a man page on ubuntu. Could someone give > me a hint, why it does not exist or is the man page name just > different on ubuntu? We don't tend to h