Re: Reportbug's behaviour now that bts=ubuntu is dropped

2009-01-07 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 16:33:38 -0700 Charlie Kravetz wrote: >On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 14:21:20 -0500 >Scott Kitterman wrote: > >> On Wednesday 07 January 2009 12:30, Iain Lane wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > Just a quick mail to solicit some kind of general consensus on this >> > issue, which came up when

Re: Reportbug's behaviour now that bts=ubuntu is dropped

2009-01-07 Thread Charlie Kravetz
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 14:21:20 -0500 Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Wednesday 07 January 2009 12:30, Iain Lane wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Just a quick mail to solicit some kind of general consensus on this > > issue, which came up when I merged reportbug 3.48 from Debian[0]. > > > > Previous versions o

Re: Reportbug's behaviour now that bts=ubuntu is dropped

2009-01-07 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 12:30, Iain Lane wrote: > Hi all, > > Just a quick mail to solicit some kind of general consensus on this > issue, which came up when I merged reportbug 3.48 from Debian[0]. > > Previous versions of reportbug in Ubuntu were configured to mail bug > reports to the ubuntu

Re: Reportbug's behaviour now that bts=ubuntu is dropped

2009-01-07 Thread James Westby
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 17:30 +, Iain Lane wrote: > Hi all, > > Just a quick mail to solicit some kind of general consensus on this > issue, which came up when I merged reportbug 3.48 from Debian[0]. > > Previous versions of reportbug in Ubuntu were configured to mail bug > reports to the ubunt

Reportbug's behaviour now that bts=ubuntu is dropped

2009-01-07 Thread Iain Lane
Hi all, Just a quick mail to solicit some kind of general consensus on this issue, which came up when I merged reportbug 3.48 from Debian[0]. Previous versions of reportbug in Ubuntu were configured to mail bug reports to the ubuntu-users mailing list (AFAIK, I've never been subscribed to this).