Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Alexandre Franke [2007-07-23 15:15 +0200]:
>> There is a spec [1] that was announced to be implemented for Feisty.
>> The goal of this spec is to "fix the Linux audio mess once and for
>> all". The spec mainly consists in getting rid of esd and use
>> pulseaudio in
What's wrong with running PulseAudio as a system-wide daemon? Works
fine when I've tested it with multiple users!
BR
/Ernst
On 10/23/07, Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...multiuser compatibility...
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify setti
Hi all,
Alexandre Franke [2007-07-23 15:15 +0200]:
> There is a spec [1] that was announced to be implemented for Feisty.
> The goal of this spec is to "fix the Linux audio mess once and for
> all". The spec mainly consists in getting rid of esd and use
> pulseaudio instead. As far as I can see, e
Should be added as a follow-up to this conversation: Pulseaudio is now
enabled by default on new Fedora installs.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-August/msg01196.html
I wonder if there is already some sort of collaboration between
Ubuntu, Fedora and upstream (Pulseaudio) on
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 08:18 +0100, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> I thought PulseAudio had gained libflashsupport already -
> http://pulseaudio.vdbonline.net/libflashsupport/ ?
No. Notice that libflashsupport is not in Ubuntu.
Thanks.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed messag
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 01:49 -0400, Daniel T. Chen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 15:15 +0200, Alexandre Franke wrote:
> > pulseaudio instead. As far as I can see, esd is still used in Feisty
> > and I wonder if someone still cares about it. Moreover pulseaudio
>
> esd will still be used i
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 15:15 +0200, Alexandre Franke wrote:
> pulseaudio instead. As far as I can see, esd is still used in Feisty
> and I wonder if someone still cares about it. Moreover pulseaudio
esd will still be used in gutsy. Whether it's also used in gutsy+1 (the
next LTS) remains in t
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 15:15 +0200, Alexandre Franke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is a spec [1] that was announced to be implemented for Feisty.
> The goal of this spec is to "fix the Linux audio mess once and for
> all". The spec mainly consists in getting rid of esd and use
> pulseaudio instead. As far
Hi,
There is a spec [1] that was announced to be implemented for Feisty.
The goal of this spec is to "fix the Linux audio mess once and for
all". The spec mainly consists in getting rid of esd and use
pulseaudio instead. As far as I can see, esd is still used in Feisty
and I wonder if someone stil
