Re: Suggestion: Leaky temp directory with encrypted home directories

2010-07-09 Thread Rob King
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 09:16 -0500, Dustin Kirkland wrote: On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Rob King jk...@deadpixi.com wrote: Hello everyone, Ubuntu's encrypted home directory feature is quite useful, and a good way of increasing the security and privacy of information. However,

Suggestion: Leaky temp directory with encrypted home directories

2010-07-02 Thread Rob King
Hello everyone, Ubuntu's encrypted home directory feature is quite useful, and a good way of increasing the security and privacy of information. However, the scheme is a little leaky. Applications still use the default system-wide temporary directory (/tmp), which is not encrypted. For

Re: Suggestion: Leaky temp directory with encrypted home directories

2010-07-02 Thread Dustin Kirkland
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Rob King jk...@deadpixi.com wrote: Hello everyone,    Ubuntu's encrypted home directory feature is quite useful, and a good way of increasing the security and privacy of information.    However, the scheme is a little leaky. Applications still use the default

Re: Suggestion: Leaky temp directory with encrypted home directories

2010-07-02 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, Dustin Kirkland kirkl...@canonical.com writes: However, it's worth mentioning that /tmp is wiped on every boot in Ubuntu. For this reason, I usually put my /tmp in a tmpfs in memory (on systems where I have a few GB of memory). Add this line to your /etc/fstab: tmpfs /tmp tmpfs rw

Re: Suggestion: Leaky temp directory with encrypted home directories

2010-07-02 Thread Lucian Adrian Grijincu
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Ansgar Burchardt ans...@43-1.org wrote: Ubuntu.  For this reason, I usually put my /tmp in a tmpfs in memory (on systems where I have a few GB of memory). [...] This is not always true.  Contents of a tmpfs can be swapped to disk[1] and you might thus leak