On 31/10/17 10:37, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> I'd love it if there was a first-hand public statement from Greg or
> someone similar that said their intent is for every new LTS kernel to
> be supported for 6 years. Or that 4.14 will definitely be an Extended
> LTS.
>
Just to finish this off (and only
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 4:32 AM, J Fernyhough wrote:
> https://twitter.com/gregkh/status/913676688436924417
That particular tweet is not very precise.
I'd love it if there was a first-hand public statement from Greg or
someone similar that said their intent is for every
On 30 October 2017 at 22:25, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 6:09 PM, J Fernyhough wrote:
>> 4.14 will (I believe) be supported for six years (so
>> should last the full life of bionic).
>
> Do you have any evidence for that claim?
>
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 6:09 PM, J Fernyhough wrote:
> 4.14 will (I believe) be supported for six years (so
> should last the full life of bionic).
Do you have any evidence for that claim?
I would not assume that every LTS kernel will be an Extended LTS. See
that 4.4 is
=news_item=Ubuntu-18.04-LTS-Linux-4.15
Kind regards,
Bryan
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 6:09 PM, J Fernyhough <j.fernyho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Has there been any discussion or decision made on the target kernel for
> bionic?
>
> If not, can I request that consideration is given to the
Has there been any discussion or decision made on the target kernel for
bionic?
If not, can I request that consideration is given to the 4.14 LTS
kernel, matching the use of 4.4 in xenial, rather than the non-LTS 3.13
in trusty?
While it will likely be several point-releases old/mature