To be clear, and as I'm sure you already know, you will not benefit from
EXT4's advanced layout functionality for existing files if you convert.
Only new files will be created with extents and the rest of the advanced
features.
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 14:40 -0700, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> Colin Watson
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 02:40:51PM -0700, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > ext4 will be available as a partitioning option as of tomorrow's daily
> > builds.
>
> I'm looking forward to this. I've been looking forward to ext4 for
> years. I could do an install from scratch, but I'm ho
Colin Watson wrote:
> ext4 will be available as a partitioning option as of tomorrow's daily
> builds.
I'm looking forward to this. I've been looking forward to ext4 for
years. I could do an install from scratch, but I'm hoping that I can
"upgrade" my existing ext3 to ext4 as you can going from ex
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 04:07:27PM -0800, Dean Loros wrote:
> I am active at ubuntuforums in the testing/development support area &
> there has been a fair amount of talk in the following thread:
> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=965879
>
> As EXT4 has just been termed "stable", is the
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:01:03 +
From: Matthew Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Thoughts about EXT4 optional in Jaunty Development &
questions about Plymouth
To: ubuntu-devel-discuss Dev
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: tex
On Nov 24, 2008, at 12:07 AM, Dean Loros wrote:
...
There has been talk in the testing group about Plymouth & possible
replacement of Usplash...IMO Plymouth provides a better user experience
due to a "more" seamless blending of Grub, Kernel boot & GDM. I realize
that there could be "issues" with
I am active at ubuntuforums in the testing/development support area &
there has been a fair amount of talk in the following thread:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=965879
As EXT4 has just been termed "stable", is there a possibility that it
can be included as optional ? A use request