Dimitri John Ledkov schreef op 30-06-2016 20:14:
My current hunch is like this at the moment:
- 18.04 to still have an i386 port in the archive, and be upgradable
to.
- 18.04 not having desktop/server install media (however maybe even
releases before that)
- 18.04 has "ubuntu-desktop" but
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Charl Wentzel
wrote:
>
>
> On 01/07/2016 21:05, Bryan Quigley wrote:
>
> Can you elaborate on what specific systems you are purchasing today
> that use 32-bit x86 (I believe the only vendors ever were AMD, Intel
> and VIA)?
>
> The
On 01/07/2016 21:05, Bryan Quigley wrote:
Can you elaborate on what specific systems you are purchasing today
that use 32-bit x86 (I believe the only vendors ever were AMD, Intel
and VIA)?
The chipsets are mostly AMD and Intel as you've stated. The vendor I
purchase from mostly is iEi. They
> I use Ubuntu as my main platform on embedded system. There are still many
> viable 32-bit platforms that are being manufactured.
Can you elaborate on what specific systems you are purchasing today
that use 32-bit x86 (I believe the only vendors ever were AMD, Intel
and VIA)?
Also what is
On 29/06/2016 15:37, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
Folks, I think we need to understand whether i386 won't be widely used
for very small IoT devices and hence be important for developers
targeting those. I accept i386 i no longer relevant for PC's and
laptops, but I would not be surprised if 32-bit
OK, I'm reassured that we're thinking about this appropriately, thanks
Dimitri & friends.
Mark
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Hello Mark,
On 29 June 2016 at 14:37, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
>
> Folks, I think we need to understand whether i386 won't be widely used
> for very small IoT devices and hence be important for developers
> targeting those. I accept i386 i no longer relevant for PC's and
>
Hello,
On 28 June 2016 at 21:08, Seth Arnold wrote:
>> 18.04 LTS:
>> * continue to provide i386 port to run legacy applications on amd64
>> * stop producing i386 d-i / netboot installer
>> * stop producing i386 kernel
>> * stop producing i386 cloud-images
>> * stop
On 29.06.2016 15:37, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
>
> Folks, I think we need to understand whether i386 won't be widely used
> for very small IoT devices and hence be important for developers
> targeting those. I accept i386 i no longer relevant for PC's and
> laptops, but I would not be surprised if
Let's also factor in flavors like Lubuntu that aim to use very minimal
resources and that have the ability to run with ~ 300 MB of RAM on an
i386 machine. While I understand modern applications are removing i386
support, we have a nice application base for Lubuntu for both LXDE and
LXQt that
Greetings,
Let's also factor in flavors like Lubuntu that aim to use very minimal
resources and that have the ability to run with ~ 300 MB of RAM on an
i386 machine. While I understand modern applications are removing i386
support, we have a nice application base for Lubuntu for both LXDE and
Folks, I think we need to understand whether i386 won't be widely used
for very small IoT devices and hence be important for developers
targeting those. I accept i386 i no longer relevant for PC's and
laptops, but I would not be surprised if 32-bit x86 is used in small
'embedded' environments.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 02:54:13PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Let me resurrect this thread. In the context of what we should be
> doing in 18.04 and what to do between now and then.
Thanks for raising this again; it'd be nice to have a plan in place before
we wind up in a difficult
r i386. I
> don't
> > see much reason to separate the userspace security support, but we will
> see
> > what the surveys say.
> >
> > Anyway next steps I see:
> > * We discussed dropping Ubuntu-desktop i386 images for 16.10+ previously.
> > That seems like the ob
hat the surveys say.
Anyway next steps I see:
* We discussed dropping Ubuntu-desktop i386 images for 16.10+ previously.
That seems like the obvious one to drop i386 first. Anyone against doing
that now?
* I'll write and distribute the surveys.
* Ask specific flavors if they want to drop i386 ah
amd64 kernel, and
>> amd64 graphics drivers. And hardware validation is done on amd64 too.
>>
>> In 2016, people with i386-only hardware are unlikely to be capable to
>> run Unity 7 Desktop, and probably run other Ubuntu variants. I guess
>> there are some accidental i38
l simply EOL.
>>
>> * because any new installation is amd64 capable, or such is the Ubuntu
>> Desktop ISO installer requirement for 16.04 LTS
>>
>> * reduce releases.ubuntu.com mirror costs by about a third
>>
>> Otherwise, all survey results will remain co
still
> need to take some action even if it's just saying.. Sorry Ubuntu
> x86_32 with Unity can't be upgraded any further. But then I don't see
> the harm in saying click here to install Desktop Environment X.
>
>>>>
>>>> * because any new installation is amd64 ca
ith Unity can't be upgraded any further. But then I don't see
the harm in saying click here to install Desktop Environment X.
>>>
>>> * because any new installation is amd64 capable, or such is the Ubuntu
>>> Desktop ISO installer requirement for 16.04 LTS
>
* because any new installation is amd64 capable, or such is the Ubuntu
> Desktop ISO installer requirement for 16.04 LTS
>
> * reduce releases.ubuntu.com mirror costs by about a third
>
> Otherwise, all survey results will remain constant.
>
> Building images is cheap, however I do
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 6:27 AM, Jean-Baptiste Lallement
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 02/02/2016 08:58, Stefan Bader wrote:
>>>
>>> >My guess is that: all currently shipped hardware, with enough support
>>> >to run full Unity (7) Desktop, is amd64. Tested with amd64
are are unlikely to be capable to
> run Unity 7 Desktop, and probably run other Ubuntu variants. I guess
> there are some accidental i386 users, e.g. those that have installed
> i386 variant on amd64 hardware.
>
> Does it still make sense to build ubuntu-desktop-i386.iso? Validate
on is amd64 capable, or such is the Ubuntu
Desktop ISO installer requirement for 16.04 LTS
* reduce releases.ubuntu.com mirror costs by about a third
Otherwise, all survey results will remain constant.
Building images is cheap, however I do not believe we can actually
adequately support i386 ones for ubunt
23 matches
Mail list logo