in-line :-
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 05:57, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:40:05PM +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote:
a. Lots of background services which are started by default.
Background services are either doing something (in which case the user
expects
shirish शिरीष wrote:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 05:57, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:40:05PM +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote:
a. Lots of background services which are started by default.
Background services are either doing something (in which case the user
Hi all,
I have a friend who has a ubuntu laptop . She was complaining
that the OS eats her batteries more than Windows XP.
A little searching around gave me many examples of this. For e.g.
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/laptop-testing-team/2009-February/001239.html
and
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 09:37:01PM +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote:
Has there been any thought of having a distribution specifically for
laptop users (similar to the initiative taken for netbooks - Ubuntu
Netbook remix) otherwise laptop owners have to go through quite few
hoops to make it less
Matthew Garrett wrote:
What would the differences be?
If you google for ext4 and battery life you can find quite a bit of
discussion about how the default filesystem configuration prevents the
disk from being able to go to sleep. The bottom line is optimizing for
performance is more or
On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 11:40 -0500, Patrick Goetz wrote:
If you google for ext4 and battery life you can find quite a bit of
discussion about how the default filesystem configuration prevents the
disk from being able to go to sleep. The bottom line is optimizing for
performance is more or
Martin Owens wrote:
What would be more ideal is to sort out the file system driver so it
behaved differently when it's on battery power (or in any kind of energy
conservation mode).
Based on having spent a few days reading through the massive ext4 debate
that occurred between the 2.6.29
at bottom :-
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 22:16, Martin Owens docto...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 11:40 -0500, Patrick Goetz wrote:
If you google for ext4 and battery life you can find quite a bit of
discussion about how the default filesystem configuration prevents the
disk from being
On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 22:40 +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote:
The use-cases are unique to laptops and laptops in battery-mode. Any
benefits on this are surely going to overlap with UNR as well. (as it
suffers from similar constraints)
I can see it also effecting these new cloud computing servers
in-line :-
2009/9/22 Martin Owens docto...@gmail.com:
On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 22:40 +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote:
The use-cases are unique to laptops and laptops in battery-mode. Any
benefits on this are surely going to overlap with UNR as well. (as it
suffers from similar constraints)
I can
in-line :-
2009/9/22 Martin Owens docto...@gmail.com:
On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 22:40 +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote:
The use-cases are unique to laptops and laptops in battery-mode. Any
benefits on this are surely going to overlap with UNR as well. (as it
suffers from similar constraints)
I can
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 11:40:27AM -0500, Patrick Goetz wrote:
If you google for ext4 and battery life you can find quite a bit of
discussion about how the default filesystem configuration prevents the
disk from being able to go to sleep. The bottom line is optimizing for
performance is
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:40:05PM +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote:
a. Lots of background services which are started by default.
Background services are either doing something (in which case the user
expects them to be doing so), are idle (and therefore not consuming any
energy) or are buggy (in
13 matches
Mail list logo
