On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Linus Eklöf wrote:
>
> This breaks the easy set up for folder sharing in nautilus since only the
> guest access will work unless setting up samba manually.
>
> Is this intended or should this feature be present and filed as a bug?
It was removed upstream (pam_smbpa
If it is planned to have libpam-smbpass removed from 16.04, shouldn't there
be a change in nautilus-share as well so only guest access authentication
is possible?
Right now it might be rather confusing to share a folder and it just won't
work unless you configure samba manually, and if you are comf
On 08.03.2016 [17:29:11 +0100], Linus Eklöf wrote:
> If it is planned to have libpam-smbpass removed from 16.04, shouldn't there
> be a change in nautilus-share as well so only guest access authentication
> is possible?
Possibly, I have no idea :) I was just trying to provide you an answer
to your
On 08.03.2016 [14:12:46 +0100], Linus Eklöf wrote:
> This breaks the easy set up for folder sharing in nautilus since only the
> guest access will work unless setting up samba manually.
>
> Is this intended or should this feature be present and filed as a bug?
Looking at the src:samba package:
ht
This breaks the easy set up for folder sharing in nautilus since only the
guest access will work unless setting up samba manually.
Is this intended or should this feature be present and filed as a bug?
Cheers,
Linus
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modif
