Re: gthumb

2021-02-11 Thread Thomas Ward
wrote: Hello, i want to print 9 pictures on 1 page with gthumb. Everything goes fine, only printing stops everytime. So the page is ready for printing, all the necesary installations are ok, but printing does not work. Can anyone help me?? thanks Y.R. van Rooijen -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss

gthumb

2021-02-11 Thread Yvonne van Rooijen
Hello,  i want to print 9 pictures on 1 page with gthumb. Everything goes fine, only printing stops everytime. So the page is ready for printing, all the necesary installations are ok, but printing does not work. Can anyone help me?? thanks Y.R. van Rooijen -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing

Re: gthumb vs fspot

2009-12-02 Thread Markus Hitter
Am 21.11.2009 um 13:02 schrieb Dave Morley: Gthumb and fspot both have similar tool set for editing: [...] it's only 2 big advantages I see are uploading to online galleries and timeline view. Is it just me or doesn't do the F-Spot shipped with Karmic editing at all? Timeline view

Re: gthumb vs fspot

2009-12-02 Thread Onkar Shinde
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Markus Hitter m...@jump-ing.de wrote: Am 21.11.2009 um 13:02 schrieb Dave Morley: Gthumb and fspot both have similar tool set for editing: [...] it's only 2 big advantages I see are uploading to online galleries and timeline view. Is it just me or doesn't

Re: gthumb vs fspot

2009-12-02 Thread Markus Hitter
Am 02.12.2009 um 12:39 schrieb Onkar Shinde: On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Markus Hitter m...@jump-ing.de wrote: Is it just me or doesn't do the F-Spot shipped with Karmic editing at all? Timeline view? No such thing here. Which version of Ubuntu are you using? F-Spot 0.6.1.5 on Ubuntu

Re: gthumb vs fspot

2009-12-02 Thread Mohammed Bassit
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 18:40 +0100, Markus Hitter wrote: Am 02.12.2009 um 12:39 schrieb Onkar Shinde: On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Markus Hitter m...@jump-ing.de wrote: Is it just me or doesn't do the F-Spot shipped with Karmic editing at all? Timeline view? No such thing here.

Re: gthumb vs fspot

2009-12-02 Thread Mohammed Bassit
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 18:40 +0100, Markus Hitter wrote: Now, to find out about the version of F-Spot I launched F-Spot for the first time on it's own and *drumroll* there is a edit button. However, when launching F-Spot via the context menu (open with...) in Nautilus (the file

gthumb vs fspot

2009-12-01 Thread Dave Morley
After watching the uds video on applications, Here are my general findings as a novice user of both tools for photo editing. Gthumb runs faster than fspot by about 10 second on one folder holding about 69 photos. From what I can see both apps grab the same info from the camera however I prefer

Re: gThumb

2008-01-17 Thread Mario Vukelic
On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 18:28 -0500, David A. Harding wrote: F-Spot is inefficent and may violate Microsoft's patents. Ubuntu users deserve beautiful things and they don't deserve to have them taken away because we ignored potential patent violations According to MS, the Linux kernel

Re: gThumb

2008-01-17 Thread Bryan Quigley
to a consensus on that subject. The gThumb removal surprised me as I have been watching ( https://wiki.ubuntu.com/HardyReducingDuplication) and did not see any discussion on which to remove. Thank You, Bryan Quigley On Jan 17, 2008 3:05 AM, Mario Vukelic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2008-01-16

Re: gThumb

2008-01-16 Thread George Farris
On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 13:19 +, Scott James Remnant wrote: On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 13:59 +0100, Wouter Stomp wrote: On Jan 15, 2008 5:59 AM, Bryan Quigley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was wondering what the reasoning was to get rid of gThumb in the default install (ubuntu desktop

Re: gThumb

2008-01-16 Thread Evan
On Jan 16, 2008 4:36 PM, George Farris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: F-Spot in Gutsy with a default install will NOT display my photos, on my Acer Aspire Laptop however Gthumb will. How do you mean? Does it not support the file format, or is this a bug that should be reported? I second the DVD

Re: gThumb

2008-01-16 Thread David A. Harding
On Tue Jan 15 15:41:30 2008, Scott James Remnant wrote: | On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 10:38 -0500, Bryan Quigley wrote: | | I outlined in my specification[1] how gThumb is more [memory] | | efficent and takes up less [disk or CDROM] space. | | | | [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/No-Mono-by-Default

Re: gThumb

2008-01-16 Thread George Farris
On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 17:17 -0500, Evan wrote: On Jan 16, 2008 4:36 PM, George Farris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: F-Spot in Gutsy with a default install will NOT display my photos, on my Acer Aspire Laptop however Gthumb will. How do you mean? Does

Re: gThumb

2008-01-15 Thread Wouter Stomp
On Jan 15, 2008 5:59 AM, Bryan Quigley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was wondering what the reasoning was to get rid of gThumb in the default install (ubuntu desktop package). Is their an application that has been added to help people organize home movies that I missed? To reduce duplication. F

Re: gThumb

2008-01-15 Thread Scott James Remnant
On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 13:59 +0100, Wouter Stomp wrote: On Jan 15, 2008 5:59 AM, Bryan Quigley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was wondering what the reasoning was to get rid of gThumb in the default install (ubuntu desktop package). Is their an application that has been added to help people

Re: gThumb

2008-01-15 Thread Bryan Quigley
I outlined in my specification (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/No-Mono-by-Default) how gThumb has more functionality than F-Spot, is more efficient memory wise and takes up less space. Thanks, Bryan On Jan 15, 2008 8:19 AM, Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 13:59 +0100

Re: gThumb

2008-01-15 Thread Kevin Fries
resending to group, cuz I accidentally replied to poster On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 15:41 +, Scott James Remnant wrote: We feel the opposite, that f-spot has a better user experience. This argument has raged before. Has anyone thought of maybe a compromise... Something much better than GThumb

Re: gThumb

2008-01-15 Thread Milan
Kevin Fries wrote: This argument has raged before. Has anyone thought of maybe a compromise... Something much better than GThumb (not hard) but not based on Mono. Maybe something like Blue Marine? http://bluemarine.tidalwave.it/ Just a thought. They already package a DEB file

Re: gThumb

2008-01-15 Thread Kevin Fries
On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 19:34 +0100, Milan wrote: Kevin Fries wrote: This argument has raged before. Has anyone thought of maybe a compromise... Something much better than GThumb (not hard) but not based on Mono. Maybe something like Blue Marine? http://bluemarine.tidalwave.it

Re: gThumb

2008-01-15 Thread Mackenzie Morgan
, 2008-01-15 at 19:34 +0100, Milan wrote: Kevin Fries wrote: This argument has raged before. Has anyone thought of maybe a compromise... Something much better than GThumb (not hard) but not based on Mono. Maybe something like Blue Marine? http://bluemarine.tidalwave.it/ Just

gThumb

2008-01-14 Thread Bryan Quigley
I was wondering what the reasoning was to get rid of gThumb in the default install (ubuntu desktop package). Is their an application that has been added to help people organize home movies that I missed? Thanks, Bryan -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com