On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 18:40 +0100, Markus Hitter wrote:
> Now, to find out about the version of F-Spot I launched F-Spot for
> the first time on it's own and *drumroll* there is a edit button.
> However, when launching F-Spot via the context menu ("open with...")
> in Nautilus (the file man
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 18:40 +0100, Markus Hitter wrote:
> Am 02.12.2009 um 12:39 schrieb Onkar Shinde:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Markus Hitter wrote:
> >>
> >> Is it just me or doesn't do the F-Spot shipped with Karmic editing at
> >> all? Timeline view? No such thing here.
> >
> >
Am 02.12.2009 um 12:39 schrieb Onkar Shinde:
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Markus Hitter wrote:
>>
>> Is it just me or doesn't do the F-Spot shipped with Karmic editing at
>> all? Timeline view? No such thing here.
>
> Which version of Ubuntu are you using?
F-Spot 0.6.1.5 on Ubuntu 9.10 x86
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Markus Hitter wrote:
>
> Am 21.11.2009 um 13:02 schrieb Dave Morley:
>
>> Gthumb and fspot both have similar tool set for editing:
>> [...]
>> it's only 2 big advantages I see are uploading to online galleries
>> and timeline view.
>
> Is it just me or doesn't do th
Am 21.11.2009 um 13:02 schrieb Dave Morley:
> Gthumb and fspot both have similar tool set for editing:
> [...]
> it's only 2 big advantages I see are uploading to online galleries
> and timeline view.
Is it just me or doesn't do the F-Spot shipped with Karmic editing at
all? Timeline view? N
After watching the uds video on applications, Here are my general
findings as a novice user of both tools for photo editing.
Gthumb runs faster than fspot by about 10 second on one folder holding
about 69 photos.
>From what I can see both apps grab the same info from the camera however
I prefer
