On Thu, 16 May 2019 07:48:40 -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> I've cc'ed sudo-users, so the question to the upstream sudo list can
> be summarized as:
> How likely would it be for upstream sudo to add HOME to env_keep by default?
Extremely unlikely. Prior to sudo 1.7.4 the HOME and MAIL
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 6:35 AM Carl Friis-Hansen
wrote:
>
> On 5/16/19 3:03 AM, Alex Murray wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2019-05-15 at 02:42:56 +0930, Dan Streetman wrote:
> >
> >> in Ubuntu, sudo retains the calling user's $HOME
> >>
> >> this is different from upstream sudo as well as all other
Good question.
I've cc'ed sudo-users, so the question to the upstream sudo list can
be summarized as:
How likely would it be for upstream sudo to add HOME to env_keep by default?
We ask because Ubuntu carries a patch that adds HOME to env_keep,
unlike the default upstream, or any other
On 5/16/19 3:03 AM, Alex Murray wrote:
On Wed, 2019-05-15 at 02:42:56 +0930, Dan Streetman wrote:
in Ubuntu, sudo retains the calling user's $HOME
this is different from upstream sudo as well as all other UNIXes and
even the sudo documentation we provide. Should we remove our custom
patch
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 01:12:56PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> in Ubuntu, sudo retains the calling user's $HOME
>
> this is different from upstream sudo as well as all other UNIXes and
> even the sudo documentation we provide. Should we remove our custom
> patch that adds this behavior?
Does
On Wed, 2019-05-15 at 02:42:56 +0930, Dan Streetman wrote:
> in Ubuntu, sudo retains the calling user's $HOME
>
> this is different from upstream sudo as well as all other UNIXes and
> even the sudo documentation we provide. Should we remove our custom
> patch that adds this behavior?
I would
in Ubuntu, sudo retains the calling user's $HOME
this is different from upstream sudo as well as all other UNIXes and
even the sudo documentation we provide. Should we remove our custom
patch that adds this behavior?
for reference and more details on downsides of our current sudo behavior, see:
