Re: pm-utils vs acpi-support

2008-07-14 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 01:26:31AM +0200, Przemysław Kulczycki wrote: > What's the status of pm-utils in Ubuntu? As far as I can see in Ubuntu > Hardy, pm-utils is installed but it's not used by default because > acpi-support is still present. It's used by default. > Maybe this could bring us c

Re: pm-utils vs acpi-support

2008-07-14 Thread Oliver Grawert
hi, Am Montag, den 14.07.2008, 01:26 +0200 schrieb Przemysław Kulczycki: > What's the status of pm-utils in Ubuntu? As far as I can see in Ubuntu > Hardy, pm-utils is installed but it's not used by default because > acpi-support is still present. When will we drop acpi-support in favour > of pm-

pm-utils vs acpi-support

2008-07-14 Thread Przemysław Kulczycki
What's the status of pm-utils in Ubuntu? As far as I can see in Ubuntu Hardy, pm-utils is installed but it's not used by default because acpi-support is still present. When will we drop acpi-support in favour of pm-utils? Maybe this could bring us closer to fixing the unfamous bug 59695. Also,