On 1/1/07, Alec Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok. Here's the situation. When you install Ubuntu, you might (like me)
not want Firefox, and prefer Epiphany instead. You might prefer mozilla
thunderbird over evolution, or BMPX over Rhythmbox. If you are one of
these people, you probably get ra
Canonical could still support their official packages. If users
installed
something else on their own, that is their business. Is this not already
the case with supported desktops?
I also wonder which is easier: making many packages co-installable
(for all future releases) or adding the propos
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 01:32:42PM +, Alec Wright wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 16:44 +0100, John Nilsson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 11:25 +0200, Sami Haahtinen wrote:
> > > Best option you have is to create a patched alternative
> > > ubuntu-desktop package with your own packages.
> >
On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 16:44 +0100, John Nilsson wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 11:25 +0200, Sami Haahtinen wrote:
> > Best option you have is to create a patched alternative
ubuntu-desktop
> > package with your own packages.
>
> Why not just "depend" on virtual packages like "supported-mua"
> "sup
On 12/31/06, Alec Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok. Here's the situation. When you install Ubuntu, you might (like me)
> not want Firefox, and prefer Epiphany instead. You might prefer mozilla
> thunderbird over evolution, or BMPX over Rhythmbox. If you are one of
> these people, you probabl
On Mo, 2007-01-01 at 00:17 +0100, Christian Leber wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 10:39:09PM +, Alec Wright wrote:
>
> > So what does everyone think? could this be acheived in fesity, or will
> > we have to wait until feisty+1?
>
> I don't get it, why should somebody be annoyed by them?
> Th
This is exactly the solution I've been hoping to see for ages.
Epiphany and Gossip are the first two programs to get installed for me
on any Ubuntu installation. Firefox and Gaim are just wasting away.
On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 18:05 +0100, Björn Ottervik wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 10:46 +0100, S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Nilsson wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 11:25 +0200, Sami Haahtinen wrote:
>> Best option you have is to create a patched alternative ubuntu-desktop
>> package with your own packages.
>
> Why not just "depend" on virtual packages like "supported-m
On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 10:46 +0100, Sebastian Heinlein wrote:
> On So, 2006-12-31 at 22:39 +, Alec Wright wrote:
> > Ok. Here's the situation. When you install Ubuntu, you might (like me)
> > not want Firefox, and prefer Epiphany instead. You might prefer mozilla
> > thunderbird over evolution,
On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 11:25 +0200, Sami Haahtinen wrote:
> Best option you have is to create a patched alternative ubuntu-desktop
> package with your own packages.
Why not just "depend" on virtual packages like "supported-mua"
"supported-browser" and so on, and have packages like firefox provide
s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alec Wright wrote:
> Here's the idea. The ubuntu-desktop metapacakge should allow different
> options for the dependencies such as mozilla-firefox OR epiphany-browser
> OR iceweasel, evolution OR mozill-thunderbird, rhythmbox OR bmpx etc
> etc.
I don'
On So, 2006-12-31 at 22:39 +, Alec Wright wrote:
> Ok. Here's the situation. When you install Ubuntu, you might (like me)
> not want Firefox, and prefer Epiphany instead. You might prefer mozilla
> thunderbird over evolution, or BMPX over Rhythmbox. If you are one of
> these people, you probabl
Christian Leber wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 10:39:09PM +, Alec Wright wrote:
>
>> So what does everyone think? could this be acheived in fesity, or will
>> we have to wait until feisty+1?
>
> I don't get it, why should somebody be annoyed by them?
> They just use a few MB diskspace and l
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 10:39:09PM +, Alec Wright wrote:
> So what does everyone think? could this be acheived in fesity, or will
> we have to wait until feisty+1?
I don't get it, why should somebody be annoyed by them?
They just use a few MB diskspace and little traffic when updates, that's
Ok. Here's the situation. When you install Ubuntu, you might (like me)
not want Firefox, and prefer Epiphany instead. You might prefer mozilla
thunderbird over evolution, or BMPX over Rhythmbox. If you are one of
these people, you probably get rather annoyed that you have to keep
Firefox, Evolution
15 matches
Mail list logo
