-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Nelson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Aaron Bentley wrote:
>> It seems like a major use case will be "build this branch using this
>> packaging branch". If we had a UI that just provided that, what
>> percentage of our users would s
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Michael Nelson wrote:
>>> The main point that underlies all my comemnts is that your focus is on
>>> "building a branch using a recipe," rather than "building a recipe."
>>
>> Yes, definitely
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Michael Nelson
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Martin Albisetti wrote:
[snip]
>> - I wonder why the packaging branch isn't something you can search for
>> and change. IIRC, there are some advanced use cases where you use more
>> voodoo, but the common cas
On Do, Feb 04, 2010 at 14:46:44 (CET), Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 13:35 +, Martin Pool wrote:
>> On 3 February 2010 22:14, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> > Your list includes this:
>> >
>> > mplayer
>> > categorized package-bug:513282
>> > categorized ok_upstream
>> > lp
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 13:35 +, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 3 February 2010 22:14, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Your list includes this:
> >
> > mplayer
> > categorized package-bug:513282
> > categorized ok_upstream
> > lp:mplayer0ok_upstream
> >
On 3 February 2010 22:14, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>
>
>
> Your list includes this:
>
> mplayer
> categorized package-bug:513282
> categorized ok_upstream
> lp:mplayer 0 ok_upstream
>
> this cannot be true. mplayer makes heavy use of svn:externals which
> don
