On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:11:36 +0100, Vincent Ladeuil vila+...@canonical.com
wrote:
3. It would also allow for starting to move udd to an SOA, or at least
make it easier.
Not a concern for udd so far.
Actually I'd like to turn add_import_jobs in to a separate service, as
it
I think switching from batch html, handcoded sql and ssh access to
higher-level alternatives would be well worth while and Django seems
like a good choice. +1 from me, and also on the specific incremental
changes.
I agree with James, and disagree with Vincent, about bringing these
changes in to
There are two big changes that aren't necessary for us, but would help a lot:
1. Decouple lp:udd from the package-import.canonical.com production
deployment
2. Split the package scanning and the branch importing parts of
lp:udd into separate projects
That sounds good to me, especially #1.
