Am 29/03/12 05:14, schrieb James Westby:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 18:06:52 -0300, Andreas Hasenack andr...@canonical.com
wrote:
I understand they are isolated and separated branches. I thought
supporting a bzr branch for the upstream branch was more of a
convenience and that merge-upstream would
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 12:21:41 +0200, Jelmer Vernooij jel...@canonical.com
wrote:
Am 29/03/12 05:14, schrieb James Westby:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 18:06:52 -0300, Andreas Hasenack
andr...@canonical.com wrote:
I understand they are isolated and separated branches. I thought
supporting a bzr
Am 29/03/12 16:02, schrieb James Westby:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 12:21:41 +0200, Jelmer Vernooij jel...@canonical.com
wrote:
Am 29/03/12 05:14, schrieb James Westby:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 18:06:52 -0300, Andreas Hasenack
andr...@canonical.com wrote:
I understand they are isolated and separated
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/29/2012 11:07 AM, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
I think Andreas was asking about a way to just export the tarball
and use it in merge-upstream without also merging the branch.
Aha. I guess you could always use something like this:
bzr export -d
