On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 12:34:12 +0200, Vincent Ladeuil
wrote:
> > It's not magic. It's moving from a database that's not designed for
> > concurrent use to one that is designed for concurrent use.
>
> Despite not being designed for concurrent use, it *is* used this way and
> lock contention
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:32:59 +0200, Vincent Ladeuil
wrote:
> > Barry Warsaw writes:
>
> > On Jun 14, 2012, at 05:21 PM, Vincent Ladeuil wrote:
> >> - I'm already running successful tests inside a quantal lxc container
> :)
>
> > It has become for many of us not just a nice-to-
> Jonathan Lange writes:
>> There is a work in progress regarding the jubany package importer
>> deployment, let's try to no step on each other feet ;)
>>
> What's the work in progress?
Setting up a quantal lxc container that can be used for both test and
production with
On 15 June 2012 09:56, Vincent Ladeuil wrote:
>> James Westby writes:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > We're interested in moving our deployment of udd away from sqlite
> > to postgres, and we're interested in doing the same thing for the
> > package importer deployment.
>
> There is a work in pro
> James Westby writes:
> Hi,
> We're interested in moving our deployment of udd away from sqlite
> to postgres, and we're interested in doing the same thing for the
> package importer deployment.
There is a work in progress regarding the jubany package importer
deployment, l
> Barry Warsaw writes:
> On Jun 14, 2012, at 05:21 PM, Vincent Ladeuil wrote:
>> - I'm already running successful tests inside a quantal lxc container :)
> It has become for many of us not just a nice-to-have but a
> must-have for Ubuntu development.
That's my understanding
