On Nov 13, 2013, at 04:51 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
>Well, to be fair my fallback process when not doing UDD is:
> - pull-lp-source
> - cd */
> - bzr init && bzr add && bzr commit -m "current"
> - Do whatever changes, commit when needed, revert, ...
> - bzr bd -S
> - dput
For my UDD branches,
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 03:32:38PM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Nov 13, 2013, at 11:32 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >But I think it would be more interesting to get a permanent fix for this
> >bug:
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/udd/+bug/714622
> >This accounts for the problem people have men
On Nov 13, 2013, at 04:28 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
>For UDD, if we can't commit to the branch, then there's zero benefit in
>even using it as the source branch as I could just as well use apt-get
>source, which will get me the current package from the archive (which
>UDD doesn't necessarily give
On Nov 13, 2013, at 09:54 PM, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
>That's a good question ... what's the goal of UDD? Having an history of the
>changes that is easy to query? Make possible to stage changes without
>uploading? Have an easy way to integrate into launchpad for reviews (by using
>the merge reques
On Nov 13, 2013, at 03:43 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
>Hmm, so if we can't planned changes to UDD branches and have to use a
>separate user-owned branch for that, then what's the use of the UDD
>branch?
>
>It sounds to me like it'd then be much easier for me to just maintain my
>own branch on the s
On Nov 13, 2013, at 11:32 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
>But I think it would be more interesting to get a permanent fix for this
>bug:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/udd/+bug/714622
>
>This accounts for the problem people have mentioned, that core packages are
>much more likely to have failed import
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 07:17:56PM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> On 13 November 2013 17:39, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio
> > wrote:
> >> Though since we're talking about it, the one stop gap fix that would
> >> make me happy woul
On 13 November 2013 17:39, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio
> wrote:
>> Though since we're talking about it, the one stop gap fix that would
>> make me happy would be if all Ubuntu Developers could trigger the
>> equivalent of the local 'req
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio
wrote:
> Though since we're talking about it, the one stop gap fix that would
> make me happy would be if all Ubuntu Developers could trigger the
> equivalent of the local 'requeue_package.py --full' command that UDD
> admins can run. Some hi
