On 07/14/2013 04:25 PM, Logan Rosen wrote:
> Every single package import appears to be failing:
>
> * with key
>
> lazr.restfulclient.errors.Unauthorized::main:_import_package:push_branches_back:set_official:lp_call:__call__:_request
>
> Any insight on this?
>
> http://package-import.ubuntu.
On 04/30/2012 04:45 PM, Max Bowsher wrote:
> On 30/04/12 18:44, Micah Gersten wrote:
>> On 04/30/2012 10:33 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>>> Now that Quantal is open for development, what do we need to do to get
>>> things
>>> switched over, and UDD all happy-like?
On 04/30/2012 10:33 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> Now that Quantal is open for development, what do we need to do to get things
> switched over, and UDD all happy-like?
>
> $ bzr branch ubuntu:precise/debootstrap precise
> bzr: ERROR: Revision
> {package-imp...@ubuntu.com-2021132053-gkdptiozkkmpd7
On 04/14/2011 02:00 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I decided to try UDD again for a new upstream version that was just released.
>
> I was following the documentation here:
>
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DistributedDevelopment/Documentation/NewUpstreamVersion
>
> I got to this step:
>
> bzr merge-upstre
On 02/08/2011 08:23 AM, Max Bowsher wrote:
> On 08/02/11 13:52, James Westby wrote:
>> On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 08:00:25 +, Max Bowsher wrote:
>>> Therefore, what about checking in the patched code, without any quilt
>>> metadata (.pc dir) but with a flag file that triggers bzr-builddeb to
>>> writ
On 01/27/2011 03:04 PM, John Arbash Meinel wrote:
> On 1/27/2011 2:57 PM, Micah Gersten wrote:
>> On 01/27/2011 02:50 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>>> Minutes of the UDD stakeholders meeting 2011-01-26 2100 UTC are now
>>> available
>>> here:
>>>
>&
On 01/27/2011 02:50 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> Minutes of the UDD stakeholders meeting 2011-01-26 2100 UTC are now available
> here:
>
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DistributedDevelopment/20110126
>
> There's been lots of excellent progress, so please do read the page. And
> remember, all are welcome t
On 01/24/2011 10:16 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jan 24, 2011, at 10:09 AM, Micah Gersten wrote:
>
>> I actually wanted to add more features to debcommit like passing an
>> author name. It might be easier to try to standardize on debcommit so
>> that it's portable
On 01/24/2011 09:54 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> We have 'bzr commit' and we have 'debcommit'. Currently, the UDD guidelines
> talk about both, but for consistency, I'd like to standardize on
recommending
> 'bzr commit'. One feature that debcommit has:
>
> DEBCOMMIT(1) DEBCOMMIT(1)
>
> NAME
> debcommi
