Re: Collision branches

2011-10-06 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 12:24:44PM -0400, James Westby wrote: In order to get some data on this I just looked back at 45 of these from the last month, and found: 9 that looked real, or at least feasible 2 that were caused by updates to .po files 4 that were caused by automatically

Re: Collision branches

2011-10-05 Thread James Westby
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 14:51:44 +1000, Martin Pool m...@canonical.com wrote: I looked into a few of them and they weren't all clearly due to quilt problems, but perhaps most of them are (or I didn't understand the cause from a glance.) In order to get some data on this I just looked back at 45 of

Re: Collision branches

2011-09-08 Thread James Westby
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 14:51:44 +1000, Martin Pool m...@canonical.com wrote: I looked into a few of them and they weren't all clearly due to quilt problems, but perhaps most of them are (or I didn't understand the cause from a glance.) Unfortunately it's necessary to look at the importer log for

Collision branches

2011-09-07 Thread James Westby
Hi, Thanks for fixing the bugs that were preventing merge proposals for getting filed for collisions. This had led to a surge in the number of such merge proposals. This is mainly due to a backlog, but there have been 10 or so in the two days since. You can see the extent of this by searching

Re: Collision branches

2011-09-07 Thread Martin Pool
On 8 September 2011 07:48, James Westby jw+deb...@jameswestby.net wrote: Hi, Thanks for fixing the bugs that were preventing merge proposals for getting filed for collisions. This had led to a surge in the number of such merge proposals. This is mainly due to a backlog, but there have been