Hi Jonathan,
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 12:24:56PM +0100, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
The new Ubuntu Packaging Guide is nearing completion but needs your help.
Browse it at http://developer.ubuntu.com/packaging/html/
Articles still to be written include
-traditional packaging
Does this refer
The new Ubuntu Packaging Guide is nearing completion but needs your help.
Browse it at http://developer.ubuntu.com/packaging/html/
Articles still to be written include
-traditional packaging
-working with Debian and upstreams
and in the knowledge base section articles needed on python, gnome
On Jul 14, 2011, at 05:26 PM, Jonathan Riddell wrote:
I've been looking over the packaging guide for what needs done to it and
issues with UDD it reveals.
Thanks very much for your great work on this Jonathan. Daniel asked me to
review your branches, which I did, although one of them needs
://people.canonical.com/~dholbach/packaging-guide/html/udd-patchsys.html
By no means is it perfect, which everyone acknowledges. Depending on your
level of pain tolerance, you don't necessarily have to punt on UDD right away
when working on a quilt3 package.
What if you just want to do quilt import
On Friday, June 03, 2011 9:51:00 AM Scott Kitterman wrote:
Just to pick one example, as soon as you want to work on a package with an
out of date branch, you need to move from the UDD toolset.
Or quilt. Ugh. If it comes down to quilt, there is no way I'm using UDD until:
- there is a
that combination. I'll stick to apt-get source for those.
I've successfully used the guidelines on this page for several quilt packages:
http://people.canonical.com/~dholbach/packaging-guide/html/udd-patchsys.html
By no means is it perfect, which everyone acknowledges. Depending on your
level
and try to figure out *which* way any particular package is
using that combination. I'll stick to apt-get source for those.
I've successfully used the guidelines on this page for several quilt packages:
http://people.canonical.com/~dholbach/packaging-guide/html/udd-patchsys.html
By no means
