Re: Evolution-data-server (3.18.x) memory leak and possibility of using 3.20 in 16.04?

2016-09-19 Thread Khurshid Alam
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:42 AM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: No. Ubuntu policy is to make only minimal changes for stable release updates with some exceptions (web browsers in particular, and certain high priority Canonical projects like snap, etc.) If you can isolate certain

Re: Evolution-data-server (3.18.x) memory leak and possibility of using 3.20 in 16.04?

2016-09-18 Thread Jeremy Bicha
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Khurshid Alam wrote: > So this brings out the question, is it possible to upload eds-3.20 on 16.04 > as regular xenial-updates? "apt rdepends evolution-data-server" and "apt > rdepends libical1a" only shows these applications which

Re: Evolution-data-server (3.18.x) memory leak and possibility of using 3.20 in 16.04?

2016-09-18 Thread Paul Smith
On Sun, 2016-09-18 at 21:31 +0500, Khurshid Alam wrote: > So this brings out the question, is it possible to upload eds-3.20 on > 16.04 as regular xenial-updates? I don't know about this.  However, if you're willing to switch to use Gnome 3.20 in general you can  subscribe your system to the

Evolution-data-server (3.18.x) memory leak and possibility of using 3.20 in 16.04?

2016-09-18 Thread Khurshid Alam
Hi, On 16.04, eds has huge memory leak. Each sub-process (basically all evolution-calendar-factory-subprocesses) starts consuming more than 40mb after boot without anything configured and then can grow beyond 100mb over time if you add google-calendar. Bug: