Re: [ubuntu-in] grub issues in karmic

2010-03-29 Thread Hrishikesh Murali
Hi, On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Parin Sharma wrote: > The main menu file, */boot/grub/grub.cfg*, is not meant to be edited, even > by 'root'. > Oops, didn't know this :) -- Thanks and Regards, Hrishikesh Murali -- ubuntu-in mailing list ubuntu-in@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.co

Re: [ubuntu-in] grub issues in karmic

2010-03-29 Thread Parin Sharma
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Hrishikesh Murali < hrishikeshmural...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Moz wrote: > >> So there are two other additional lines apart from what you sent, which >> are the search and drivemap commands. And the computer does not boot t

Re: [ubuntu-in] If not Ubuntu then what

2010-03-29 Thread ಮಲ್ಲಿಕಾರ್ಜುನ್
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:49 PM, Ramnarayan.K wrote: > 2010/3/24 Mallikarjun : > > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Ramnarayan.K > wrote: > >> > >> Imagine if Opensource folks had control over the device and the > >> software - it would be wow. And i thing in the phone segment that is > >> what

Re: [ubuntu-in] If not Ubuntu then what

2010-03-29 Thread Ramnarayan.K
2010/3/24 Mallikarjun : > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Ramnarayan.K wrote: >> >> Imagine if Opensource folks had control over the device and the >> software - it would be wow. And i thing in the phone segment that is >> what is happening >> >> openmoko is an example, as there are others. > > (

Re: [ubuntu-in] grub issues in karmic

2010-03-29 Thread Hrishikesh Murali
Hi, On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Moz wrote: > So there are two other additional lines apart from what you sent, which are > the search and drivemap commands. And the computer does not boot to XP with > this. I have no idea how to edit so that it could boot to XP. > Delete the two lines and

Re: [ubuntu-in] grub issues in karmic

2010-03-29 Thread Moz
Hi > Karmic installs GRUB2 on the MBR, not GRUB Legacy. The configuration file > in this case is /boot/grub/grub.cfg and the format is quite different when > compared to the earlier version. When you installed Karmic, GRUB2 must have > automatically recognized Windows, but I don't know why it did

Re: [ubuntu-in] grub issues in karmic

2010-03-29 Thread Ritesh Sinha
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Hrishikesh Murali wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Moz wrote: >> >> Hi All >> >> And it seems that the boot configs are changed. I can not find >> /boot/grub/menu.lst to edit. > > Karmic installs GRUB2 on the MBR, not GRUB Legacy. The configuratio

Re: [ubuntu-in] grub issues in karmic

2010-03-29 Thread Hrishikesh Murali
Hi, On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Moz wrote: > Hi All And it seems that the boot configs are changed. I can not find > /boot/grub/menu.lst to edit. > Karmic installs GRUB2 on the MBR, not GRUB Legacy. The configuration file in this case is /boot/grub/grub.cfg and the format is quite differe

[ubuntu-in] grub issues in karmic

2010-03-29 Thread Moz
Hi All I have installed Karmic on a Lenovo X41 thinkpad, which came with XP. Karmic is on a separate partition and works fine. But I can not boot to XP anymore. And it seems that the boot configs are changed. I can not find /boot/grub/menu.lst to edit. Can anyone help? Sincerely, Moz -- ubuntu