I had it on Maverick and have it on Natty as well. There's a problem
with it with 64-bit. It installs with 32-bit only.
Regards,
Saurav
On Thursday 09 June 2011 09:20 PM, Lalremlien Neitham wrote:
I tried to install it to try it out, but unable to install it. Maybe
it is only for Hardy?
On Th
I tried to install it to try it out, but unable to install it. Maybe it is
only for Hardy?
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Kaustav Das Modak <
kaustav.dasmo...@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
> Hi,
> Thanks for pointing out Lotus Symphony. Its license, however, is
> proprietary and that is enough to favour L
Hi,
Thanks for pointing out Lotus Symphony. Its license, however, is proprietary
and that is enough to favour LibreOffice :)
Thanks.
Kaustav
On 9 June 2011 17:35, Vividh Aditya wrote:
> Hi all,
> Another alternative to OpenOffice is IBM Lotus Symphony which is based on
> OpenOffice, but much be
Hi all,
Another alternative to OpenOffice is IBM Lotus Symphony which is based
on OpenOffice, but much better in aesthetics than Libre or OpenOffice.
Just try it to believe it.
Regards,
Surender
On Thursday 09 June 2011 05:30 PM, ubuntu-in-requ...@lists.ubuntu.com
wrote:
Re: alternative to
