Public bug reported:
The following python command:
from PyKDE4 import kdecore
yields:
ImportError: No module named kdecore
even though it is installed on my system:
$ locate kdecore.so
/usr/lib/pyshared/python2.6/PyKDE4/kdecore.so
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to pykde4 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/819291
Title:
PyKDE4 imports broken
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
I just performed an update and still cannot import kdecore.
** Changed in: pykde4 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to pykde4 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/819291
Title:
Public bug reported:
In the upcoming Ubuntu 11.10, the location of the X11 libraries and
headers has changed. The new locations are /usr/{lib,include}/X11. Some
third party packages, such as Enthought's Enable, depend on
numpy.distutils to provide such information, but numpy is not aware of
the
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/818867
Title:
numpy.distutils provides inaccurate system information for
ubuntu-11.10
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Public bug reported:
just trying to do update-manager -d
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-9.43-generic 2.6.38.4
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-9-generic x86_64
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sun May 29 08:20:37 2011
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789856
Title:
package blcr-dkms 0.8.2-15ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: blcr
kernel module failed to build
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ca-certificates-java
I was trying to do update-manager -d today
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: ca-certificates-java 20110426
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-9.43-generic 2.6.38.4
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-9-generic x86_64
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789855
Title:
package ca-certificates-java 20110426 failed to install/upgrade:
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned
** Changed in: pyqwt5 (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released = New
--
python-qwt5-qt4 will not install on Jaunty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342782
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
This package was never fixed in Jaunty, and it is broken again in
Karmic. I was able to install pyqwt-5.2.0 from source by running the
following in PyQwt-5.2.0/configure:
$ python configure.py -Q ../qwt-5.2 -4 -L /usr -I /usr
--module-install-path=/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/PyQt4/
Qwt5
$ make
Looks like this has been accepted for inclusion in debian:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/h/hdf5.html . Any chance ubuntu can fold
them in from debian?
--
[needs packaging] please include hdf5-1.8 in jaunty jackalope
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308280
You received this bug notification
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 401497 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401497
This problem also appears when changing to dvorak using sudo dpkg-
reconfigure console-setup. The new settings do not survive a reboot, but
they can be recovered after rebooting by running sudo /etc/init.d
Perhaps something to do with where the package is installed? Maybe
pkg_resources doesn't know how to handle all the unconventional package
locations created by debian's python policy.
--
python-nose is broken in Karmic alpha 2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389942
You received this bug
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: python-nose
python-nose is broken in Karmic alpha 2:
$ nosetests
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/nosetests, line 8, in module
load_entry_point('nose==0.10.4', 'console_scripts', 'nosetests')()
File
Thank you Slayton. Would you consider packaging for Karmic?
It would really be nice if Ubuntu would include these in the standard
repositories.
--
[needs packaging] please include hdf5-1.8 in jaunty jackalope
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308280
You received this bug notification because you
sip-4.8 and pyqt4-4.5.1 were needed in order to build pykde-4.3. Please
just bump qscintilla and python-qscintilla to version 2.4, that should
solve the problem reported here. (It would be nice if these could be
bumped soon, I rely heavily on eric4).
Thanks
--
Eric IDE fails to launch, cannot
Does anyone know what is holding up applying the fix to the package
manager?
--
python-qwt5-qt4 will not install on Jaunty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342782
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
Does anyone know what is holding up applying the fix to the package
manager?
--
python-qwt5-qt4 will not install on Jaunty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342782
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
I just downloaded the PyQwt-5.1.0 release, not a snapshot, and installed
it for python-2.6 using:
$ python configure.py -Q ../qwt-5.1 -4 -L /usr/lib -I /usr/include/
--module-install-path=/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/PyQt4/Qwt5
$ make
$ sudo make install
I ran some of the qt4 examples
I don't understand why people think pyqwt5 does not work with
python-2.6. Has anyone bothered to contact the developer? He says he
reinstalled the official release on python-2.6 and ran his tests and
they all passed.
Maybe there are problems installing on jaunty, perhaps related to
jaunty's
Between this broken package and the difficulty I have experienced
installing my own copies of sip/PyQt4/qscintilla/PyQwt5 (probably due to
the changes in the default package installation directories, where
/usr/local/lib is preferred to /usr/lib, but /usr/lib has precedence on
sys.path!), I have
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: python-qwt5-qt4
I am unable to install python-qwt5-qt4 on jaunty alpha 6:
$ sudo apt-get install python-qwt5-qt4
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: python-nose
With python-nose-10.3.1, which is available in jaunty, I get errors when
running unit tests:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File setup.py, line 556, in
I dont know anything about packaging for ubuntu (though I am willing to
learn if you can point me in the right direction).
This morning I upgraded to jaunty alpha 6 and compiled hdf5-1.8.2 from
source. There were two issues, both covered at
It looks like this bug is not fixed in python-2.5.4 after all. The
python devs only applied the fix to python-2.6 and later.
--
allow from .module import * in python
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/319028
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Public bug reported:
The version of python-2.5.2 available on intrepid has a big problem, it
does not allow importing * with a relative import:
from .module import *
SyntaxError: 'import *' not allowed with 'from .'
This is issue 2400 in the python bugtracker:
http://bugs.python.org/issue2400
Public bug reported:
I would like to request a new package be included in Jaunty: h5py
(http://h5py.alfven.org/). h5py is a python package for working with
hdf5 files. It can be used with hdf5-1.6.x, but I would like to request
that it be used with hdf5-1.8 in order to enable a number of
Public bug reported:
hdf5-1.8.2 is the latest release from the hdf5 group. Version 1.8 still
provides the ability for programs to be compiled against the 1.6 api, so
backwards compatibility should not be a major issue. Programs compiled
against the 1.8 can take advantage of a host of new
Public bug reported:
hdf5-1.8.2 is the most current release. I would like to request its
inclusion in intrepid-backports and in Jaunty. Fedora 9 and gentoo
include hdf5-1.8, I have been using it on those platforms for some time.
When version 1.8 is installed, programs can still be compiled
30 matches
Mail list logo
