I'm describing below an other test with the same physical host and virtual
guest.
I installed the xfce desktop environment (via tasksel) and I uninstalled all
lxqt packages. I disabled the snap user service start (from the xfce session
configuration panel).
Then, the cold start of the deb
Below is the test I performed in a Qemu virtual environment.
Host : a Debian host.
Guest : Debian bookworm x86_64, LXQT, deinstalled preload and firefox-esr for
light desktop.
On the guest I installed 2 flavours of the same 100.0 version of Firefox on :
- the snap : 100.0-2 (snap revision 1300)
I filled this bug report :
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1766854
** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #1766854
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1766854
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
I installed the Jammy Jellyfish version. When I launch firefox, the
delay between my click and the apparition of the window is very long
compared to the behaviour of the previous versions of Ubuntu. The deb
package is just pulling the firefox snap. Why did you decide this
Public bug reported:
When installing a package with 'apt install [package name]', I see the deb
files which appear in /var/cache/apt/archives.
However, just after installation, the deb file are deleted from this directory.
I would prefer a deletion after a few days. Sometimes, we
I downloaded the below daily build :
https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Linux-
rpm_deb-x86_64@86-TDF/current/master~2021-09-26_16.13.32_LibreOfficeDev_7.3.0.0.alpha0_Linux_x86-64_deb.tar.gz
Into this file, I found the libreofficedev7.3_7.3.0.0.alpha0-1_amd64.deb
package which has
Created attachment 175300
/opt/libreofficedev7.3/program/soffice in version 7.3.0.0.alpha0
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452073
Title:
[Upstream] Shouldn't detect configuration at
Created attachment 175278
/opt/libreoffice7.2/program/soffice shell script in version 7.2.1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452073
Title:
[Upstream] Shouldn't detect configuration at
I downloaded the latest release :
https://download.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/stable/7.2.1/deb/x86_64/LibreOffice_7.2.1_Linux_x86-64_deb.tar.gz.torrent
The libreoffice7.2_7.2.1.2-2_amd64.deb packages has the below file :
/opt/libreoffice7.2/program/soffice
This bug still appears into the
Public bug reported:
~$ bouncy
pygame 1.9.6
Hello from the pygame community. https://www.pygame.org/contribute.html
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "game.py", line 18, in
from map import *
File "/usr/share/games/bouncy/map.py", line 7, in
import euclid, collide, objects,
If you keep this dependency weak then Libreoffice Base doesn't work.
Next the user has the feeling that Ubuntu doesn't work.
As a clean workaround, maybe we could change the following packages
dependencies of the ISOs :
- remove libreoffice (=> openjdk isn't pulled anymore)
- add
** Tags added: packaging unmetdeps
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916786
Title:
weak dependency to libreoffice-sdbc-hsqldb
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Public bug reported:
The user can't create a new Base file with the wizard if the
libreoffice-sdbc-hsqldb package isn't installed. The package
libreoffice-base-drivers has only a "suggests" dependency to
libreoffice-sdbc-hsqldb. It should have a "depends" dependency.
ProblemType: Bug
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1861609 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861609
I get a crash which is not visible. It seems it occurs while ligthdm is
starting after the system startup. Finally I get the lightdm invite and
I can login.
** Attachment added:
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Hello,
I think the useful tree tiny command should be installed by default
(no dependency, 98kB).
Regards.
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Hello,
The default sleep delay of the screen is set to 30 minutes when
operating on mains.
I think it is too long because :
- Nowadays are the screens using mostly the lcd/led technology with fast
resume.
- The cost of the energy will increase in the coming years (what ever
the primary
I don't even know the number of users in
the different countries around the world,
but I don't think all of them have lcd's.
I mean that there is now a low ratio of CRT among the screens.
I think the users which have a CRT don't have cheap electricity/power at
the same time and would also
)
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 10:17, Jérôme Bouat jerome.bo...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
Hello,
I think the default sleep delay of the screen is too long when operating
on mains (30 minutes).
The cost of the energy will increase in the coming years (what ever
the primary source is).
I think this default
Hello,
I think the default sleep delay of the screen is too long when operating
on mains (30 minutes).
The cost of the energy will increase in the coming years (what ever
the primary source is).
I think this default delay could be decreased to 10 minutes.
Regards.
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss
minutes.
Bill Lee a écrit :
Dmitrijs Ledkovs 写道:
On 2 April 2010 15:17, Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net wrote:
On 2010/04/02 14:01 (GMT+0200) Jérôme Bouat composed:
Maybe only 1 panel which includes the windows bar (like the Microsoft
Windows task bar) would be a good trade-off
Hello,
In order to save space in height, I customized my desktop by using only
1 panel which merge the 2 defaults panels.
However merging the 2 default panels consumes space in width (the
windows list bar is tight).
Therefore I think we should add a Trash shortcut into the shortcuts menu
of
=101604 .
On 4 April 2010 15:00, Jérôme Bouat jerome.bo...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
Hello,
In order to save space in height, I customized my desktop by using only
1 panel which merge the 2 defaults panels.
However merging the 2 default panels consumes space in width (the
windows list bar
You ask the developers to give the user the choice of his/her desktop
customization. You have that choice, as demonstrated by your own
Currently not because I have to open my personnal folder, next I'm
searching where to open the trash.
It isn't currently easy. I would like a Trash shortcut
wrote:
(reply bottom posted)
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 07:23, Jérôme Bouat jerome.bo...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
You ask the developers to give the user the choice of his/her desktop
customization. You have that choice, as demonstrated by your own
Currently not because I have to open my personnal
Miata mrma...@earthlink.net wrote:
On 2010/04/02 14:01 (GMT+0200) Jérôme Bouat composed:
Maybe only 1 panel which includes the windows bar (like the Microsoft
Windows task bar) would be a good trade-off.
Kubuntu - one bar
Xubuntu - one bar
Ubuntu - one bar (netbook remix)
Ubuntu - two bar
Hello,
I think the popularity contest cron script should run on a weekly basis
instead of a daily basis.
I think this high frequency infers an useless additionnal load for all
the Ubuntu boxes.
In the production world, I think the package selection is unlikely to
change each day (even each
Hello,
I think that only 2 virtual terminals instead of 6 would be enough.
I understand that most of the memory of the virtual terminals is shared.
However, it would decrease the number of processes (more human readable
process list, less processes context switch, ...).
There is no small
inventing a problem that doesn't exist, then proposing
something mildly offensive to fix it.
-Brandon
Jérôme Bouat wrote:
Hello,
I think that only 2 virtual terminals instead of 6 would be enough.
I understand that most of the memory of the virtual terminals is shared.
However
What about the system startup duration impact ?
Max Bowsher a écrit :
Jérôme Bouat wrote:
Hello,
I think that only 2 virtual terminals instead of 6 would be enough.
I understand that most of the memory of the virtual terminals is shared.
However, it would decrease the number of processes
Hello,
Because:
- the cost of the energy will increase in the coming years (what ever
the primary source is)
- a laptop needs to spare its battery
I think that Ubuntu should set the blank screen as default screensaver
for all its flavour (Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, Ubuntu netbook edition,
... at least on
Ubuntu anyway. Correct me if I'm wrong.
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 5:54 AM, Jérôme Bouat jerome.bo...@laposte.net
mailto:jerome.bo...@laposte.net wrote:
Hello,
Because:
- the cost of the energy will increase in the coming years (what ever
the primary
Hello,
I just tested the lucid beta 1 with all updates and I noticed that the
default poweroff delay when operating on mains is 30 minutes.
I think it could be decreased (up to 10 minutes ?) in order to spare
energy and thus :
- keep the room cool
- recharge the laptop battery faster
- save
Hello,
Because:
- the cost of the energy will increase in the coming years (what ever
the primary source is)
- a laptop needs to spare its battery
I think that Ubuntu should set the blank screen as default screensaver
for all its flavour (Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu, Ubuntu netbook edition,
Hello,
This is a good idea,
however it will not save nearly as much energy
as keeping the OS small and efficient
Each detail has a side effect and may make the system better.
For example, if a bicycle competitor knows that lycra shoe cover will
save 1/1000 of his power. He will wear
Hello,
Currently, the default screen sleep delay is 30 minutes when operating
on mains.
I think it could be decreased to 10 minutes because the cost of the
energy will increase in the coming years (what ever
the primary source is).
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
I think that Ubuntu should set the blank screen as default screensaver
because :
- the cost of the energy will increase in the coming years (what ever
the primary source is)
- a laptop needs to spare its battery
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify
Hello,
The default 2nd panel is wasting place in height especially on small
screens.
The new 13 notebooks have a DVD writer as well as a powerfull processor
and thus need a Ubuntu desktop version instead of the netbook version.
Moreover, the new displays are mostly with a 16/10 or 16/9 aspect
38 matches
Mail list logo
