** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Triaged => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874272
Title:
Stage "searching for obsolete software" takes
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046386
Title:
Ubuntu Studio images aren't being built with a live user
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Noble)
Milestone: ubuntu-24.04 => ubuntu-24.04.1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874272
Title:
Stage "searching for obsolete
The grub patch linked seems similar in that grub is not clearing the
mode correctly when you enter grub text mode, i.e. the menu is drawn/you
enter the console.
However I don't think you are entering the text mode in grub at all, but
you jump straight to the kernel as part of flicker free boot -
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Noble)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.04.1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060721
Title:
APT 2.8.0: Promote weak key warnings to errors
To manage
We could have warned on upgrades to 24.04, but there's little point in
worrying about mantic now, the update has been published, it has fully
phased, there's not going to be anyone affected by this anymore, and
mantic would be EOL by the time the fix would be ready.
--
You received this bug
You seem to be running an unsupported system that has not been usr-
merged, /lib, /lib64, etc should already be a symlink to /usr/lib,
/usr/lib64, etc. To convert to a supported file system layout, install
the usrmerge package.
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You
** Tags removed: rls-ee-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1769297
Title:
resume from hibernation broken when resume image is autodetected
(UUID= syntax used)
To manage
** Changed in: htpdate (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Adrien Nader (adrien)
** Also affects: openssl (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags removed: rls-oo-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Assigning this to Nick so we don't lose track of it and can discuss it
next week
** Tags removed: rls-oo-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Nick Rosbrook (enr0n)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067672
Title:
[SRU] Openssl copyright/changelog.Debian.gz file points at non-
existent location
To manage
** Description changed:
The ELF package note metadata introduced in dpkg 1.22.6ubuntu11 (refined
in 1.22.6ubuntu14) can cause this failure:
```
gcc fatal error: environment variable ‘DEB_HOST_ARCH’ not defined
```
This happens when the `-specs=/usr/share/dpkg/elf-package-
You could use the Lenovo Diagnostics menu that comes in the Lenovo
firmware, gotta press some key for options during boot.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067176
Title:
Boot and
The UBUNTU_CODENAME field is very useful to keep things like PPAs and
third-party integrations working with downstream distributions, such
that I don't think it makes sense to remove that and break them.
** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Opinion
** Tags removed:
The following binaries from gcc-defaults are published in proposed and
need removing:
cpp-for-build cpp-for-host g++-for-build g++-for-host gcc-for-build gcc-
for-host gfortran-for-build gfortran-for-host gccgo-for-build gccgo-for-
host gdc-for-build gdc-for-host gm2-for-build gm2-for-host
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1883271 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883271
This is a duplicate of bug 1883271 and a merge proposal to fix it is in
https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/launchpad/+git/launchpad/+merge/452749
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1883271
I guess we can still install it and see that it works correctly but it
essentially amounts to double verification given it's the same code. And
I'd rather do that as part of the 0.99.49.1 when we actually need to
check that source code handling is correct anyhow.
--
You received this bug
Do we really have a test plan for it? The original test plan no longer
applies, and the code is exactly the same as we have in software-
properties 0.99.48 + software-properties-qt 0.99.48.1 once-off. We don't
have the original 0.99.48 to reproduce the bad case anymore...
Maybe we should just
@racb It's fine to replace the other software-properties upload, there's
no value in releasing it on its own since it just merges software-
properties-qt back into the main package from the temporary once-off we
did to unblock the image building.
No point pushing updated software-properties-* to
Yes sure, this is expected, that's the DEP17 M4 mitigations
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070061
Title:
Clean up the DEP17 dpkg diversions
To manage notifications about this bug
Indeed, it also doesn't fit well with the new 3.0 UI, so my plan was to
actually move the messaging until the very end, after all packages have
been successfully installed.
We can't exactly print it after the Y/n prompt directly because then
hundreds of lines will zoom by and you don't see it,
I have a feeling you truncated the first output because it doesn't
actually remove a native libglib2.0-0 but libglib2.0-0:i386 only?
Since you did not go ahead with the removal of libglib2.0-0 anyway, the
packages did not end up becoming auto-removable, and hence `sudo apt
autoremove` did not
There is no mrcal upload that was set to incomplete, only a mrbuild, but
the SRU template was in comment #1 so I copied this to the description
** Description changed:
Due to an update to an unrelated package and insufficient communication
and the rush to get 24.04 out the door, this package
Public bug reported:
As per https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071233, the
debug symbols are stripped with custom strip commands in debian/rules,
causing no debug symbols to be split off, making it impossible to debug
bpftrace.
** Affects: bpftrace (Ubuntu)
Importance:
I'm going to mark this as Won't Fix for mantic given how late we are in
the mantic release cycle; and that it only affects those people who
upgraded early in the mantic development cycle.
** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu Mantic)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug
Yes I forgot the option existed and didn't have the context while
writing the comment, but generally speaking debconf is a crapshoot and
while it is there and it makes sense to use it accordingly, we certainly
should try to avoid introducing more of it.
The file here is a mess, so it's a conffile
Robie, debconf is not a database and any setting in there needs to be
read to a configuration file and any changes in the configuration file
need to be filled back into debconf. The integration for default cmdline
with /etc/default/grub is very complex and already broke a bunch of
times.
Drop-in
** Summary changed:
- do-release-upgrade fails, mantic to noble
+ mantic->noble: E:Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this
may be caused by held packages.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
It seems you have uninstalled the Linux kernel meta packages and it
fails to install them as part of the upgrade. Please install linux-
generic before the upgrade and try again.
** Summary changed:
- do-release-upgrade fails
+ jammy-mantic: E:Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks,
Thanks for your bug report. Sadly this doesn't have enough data to be
able to investigate it further, so I'm closing it. I'm sure one day
we'll accidentally stumble over a way to reproduce and sort out the
remaining permission issues.
Feel free to look at the specified files and correct their
This is a question for base-files, and as I have said on the mailing
list, we have technically committed to these version strings at archive
opening and it is used in various artefacts and third party places,
since we do set VERSION_ID in os-release - dpkg just inherits it.
** Also affects:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 11:20:48AM GMT, Robie Basak wrote:
> Thank you for working on this! It looks like it will be useful to have
> that metadata there.
>
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2024 at 12:46:15AM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > Packaging Metadata:
> >
I was successful with the liquorix kernel (curl -s
'https://liquorix.net/install-liquorix.sh' | sudo bash)
unfortunately, I had to reinstall ubuntu to get it to work with the
screen, but with a clean ubuntu install, worked right out of the box. Im
so Glad!
--
You received this bug notification
https://liquorix.net/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064906
Title:
White screen and Screen Flickering
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
If you have Source Code enabled, and you change the pockets configuration to
"all pockets", it will add -backports without source code. The Source Code flag
will still be set in the UI, but after a reload, you can see it is in a mixed
state.
This is more notable
The ubuntu-release-upgrader fix for noble has been uploaded on the 5th
and is waiting for an SRU team member to approve it, then it will enter
proposed, and after validation, and 7 days of no complaints, it will be
released (not on Fridays).
So the earliest possible release date would be the
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066995
Title:
apport-gtk keeps prompting to report crashes in a loop
To manage
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068933
Title:
all reports with LaunchpadPrivate in them are tagged need-$arch-
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming rls-oo-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069041
Title:
Changing Port in sshd_config and restarting ssh.service
@Seb128 can we shove this over to desktop to do the design work on it?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969394
Title:
'Settings & Livepatch' button opens 'settings' tab, not livepatch
The new LUKS2 format stores the metadata in a JSON document which
requires a JSON parser in grub. Given that Ubuntu does not support
encrypted /boot partitions, the decision was made not to enable the
feature such as to prevent the JSON code from becoming an attack vector
to break secure boot.
Reassigning to the correct package. This also needs a grub2-signed task.
We can pick this patch up or if you have experience working with a gbp-
pq managed repository you could propose a merge for that. Either way,
only the UEFI team can actually release any grub updates due to signing.
**
So the context you miss is that os-prober runs each time update-grub
runs on the system still.
The use case here is a highly unusual setup where another OS is directly
installed to a LUKS partition instead of using LVM on top of LUKS, and
one needs to balance whether this is a feature we care
$ reverse-depends -c main libgo23
Reverse-Depends
===
* libgo-14-dev
Packages without architectures listed are reverse-dependencies in: amd64,
arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x
$ reverse-depends -c main libgo-14-dev
$ reverse-depends -c main lib32go-14-dev
$ reverse-depends -c main
Public bug reported:
All our architectures are supported by the standard Go toolchain, we
should demote the alternative gcc toolchain to universe, this includes
at least
libgo23 libgo-14-dev lib32go-14-dev libx32go-14-dev lib32go23 libx32go23
Possibly others but all the gccgo compilers
Update, unfortunately, i was only partly successful. the nvidia drivers
can be installed but somehow its performance is severely degraded. its
also not heating up
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Hello elvir, I think I managed to resolve the issue.
1. update
```
sudo apt update
sudo apt upgrade
```
2. update everything through the ubuntu graphical toos (snap store,
system updates, ...)
3. reboot
4. install kernel 6.9.3 through mainline. The issues seem to have largely
disappeared
Untagging this, the patch could land via patch pilot, but this is not
really a high priority item.
** Tags removed: rls-jj-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530252
Title:
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu Noble)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Chopin (schopin)
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu Oracular)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Chopin (schopin)
--
You received this bug notification because
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Nick Rosbrook (enr0n)
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
** Also affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects:
Moving this to the pp cycle as no replacement has appeared yet, so we
can look at it again in 5-6 months.
** Tags removed: rls-oo-incoming
** Tags added: rls-pp-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Tags removed: rls-oo-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063467
Title:
needrestart should mark services as needing a restart in systemd
To manage notifications about this
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Chopin (schopin)
** Tags removed: rls-oo-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I think this is more a misunderstanding here, but the "workaround" is
the right solution for this issue.
Specifically, unattended-upgrades is exactly designed to give you less
preferable upgrades because the others are reserved for manual upgrades
(i.e. -security vs -updates). That is, the
I'd suggest raising this with the Debian maintainer in their bug
tracker, but this doesn't seem like a good thing to deviate on for a
community-maintained package, it seems more vital that it be kept
uptodate (currently it's synced automatically from Debian, then it would
need manual work) and I
I tend to agree with zhjs; even if we could force it, cross-grading
ncurses-bin could get hairy.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067228
Title:
ncurses/i386 autopkgtest failure
To
On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 08:49:04PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 08:43:11AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > On Debian I have seen apt-update downloading diff files. Why don't we use
> > those for Ubuntu
>
> Disclaimer: I have never benchmarked this, but am going by
** Summary changed:
- [FFe] [HWE] fwupd-efi 1.6 and gnu-efi 3.0.18
+ [SRU] [HWE] fwupd-efi 1.6 and gnu-efi 3.0.18
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060197
Title:
[SRU] [HWE] fwupd-efi
** Tags added: foundations-todo
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Nick Rosbrook (enr0n)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067886
Title:
Not being able to upgrade to 24.04 is (now) bug 2067886.
Also for 23.10 the bug was fixed in December in noble-proposed but the
SRU team never bothered releasing it in the 6 months and it got
overriden by a security update which also has been sitting around in
proposed since March now.
--
You
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
Upgrades for users with XFS /boot are wrongly blocked for noble as the
workaround for mantic hasn't been removed.
** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
This is not an issue in the LTS.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039172
Title:
grub 2.12~rc1 fails to load files from large directories on XFS
To manage notifications about this bug
Sorry mawk is not actually essential, so in either case you miss a
Depends. Actually a PreDepends.
I do not believe a PreDepends: awk would work but I'm not sure - does it
require all awks to be configured or just one is the question.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
The issue here is that apt is forced to remove libreadline8 to allow installing
libreadline8t64. The user has gawk installed which has the higher priority for
awk.
gawk is not essential so it doesn't have the immediate handling of an essential
package.
The python3-uno package uses awk in its
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
Upgrades to noble chmod /dev/null 644, breaking use of the device on multi-user
systems for non-root.
[Test plan]
1. do-release-upgrade mantic -> noble
2. check that /dev/null remains 666
[Where problems could occur]
[Details]
This is a regression of the fix for
t; Cheers
>
> [1]
> https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/should-we-enable-proposed-by-default-with-lower-pin-priority/28580
>
> On mag 2 2024, at 3:30 pm, Robie Basak wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 02:15:59AM -0800, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> >> I'd like to suggest t
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
If you set Dir::Cache or Dir::Cache::pkgcache to /dev/null, /dev/null is
chmodded as we chmod the cache file to 666. This is a semi-common pattern to
not use a cache, and breaks user scripts.
[Test plan]
1. autopkgtests run the large integration test suite
2. run
Public bug reported:
When upgrading to 24.04 today, the process stalled when it got to os-
prober checks for other installed OSes.
As far as I can determine, this was because the network connection was
completely destroyed during upgrade leaving the machine without
connectivity, and when
And sorry likewise, you also configured i386 which is only available on
archive.ubuntu.com and its mirrors.
So you can either drop that, why do you want i386 on arm?
Or you need to add Architectures: i386 to the archive.ubuntu.com
sources, and Architectures: arm64 to the ports.ubuntu.com ones.
This is to be expected, you have configured a mirror but you are using
an arm64 machine, which is only served by ports.ubuntu.com.
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
We're still going to need a couple more snapshots of backtraces - it's
important to check if we ever return from pkgDepCache::MarkInstall()
because I do not see an infinite loop in unattended-upgrades
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
@jbicha can you provide input into why you removed the block-proposed
tag? This was breaking provisioning new CVM instances and it's not clear
to me that Azure has a new matching encrypt-cloud-image deployed that
would fix that issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
@mfo The only autopkgtest regressions the bot mentioned and that are
visible still, are the ones I flagged earlier (albeit I don't know to
whom). That's software-properties-qt/unknown failing which is to be
expected - software-properties-qt got reabsorbed into this source
package so it cannot run
Hi Daniel,
I hope the appended helps.
Kind Regards
Julian
ph1jb@ssfdt0:/var/crash$ ubuntu-bug _usr_bin_gnome-shell.1000.crash
ph1jb@ssfdt0:/var/crash$ ll -t
total 44464
drwxrwxrwt 2 root whoopsie 4096 May 18 10:09 ./
-rw--- 1 whoopsie whoopsie 37 May 18 10:07
_usr_bin_gnome
Public bug reported:
cups-browsed can hang at shutdown in a busy network, but there's nothing
important that requires it to have an ordered shutdown, so just set the
timeout to 0 to kill it immediately.
** Affects: cups (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received
root@ssfdt0:/var/crash# ll _usr_bin_gnome-shell.1000*
-rw-r- 1 ph1jb whoopsie 57293630 May 14 14:37
_usr_bin_gnome-shell.1000.crash
-rw-r--r-- 1 ph1jb whoopsie 0 May 14 14:37 _usr_bin_gnome-shell.1000.upload
-rw--- 1 whoopsie whoopsie 37 May 14 14:37
_usr_bin_gnome-shell.1000.uploaded
Public bug reported:
GNOME Shell crashed with signal 11
I use Eclipse IDE
gnome-shell crashes
1. when I drag and drop a panel
2. when I click a link in a pop-up
May 12 09:05:49 ssfdt0 gnome-shell[2628]: Window manager warning: Ping serial
11101399 was reused for window 0x22000f4, previous use
root@ssfdt0:/var/crash# ll _usr_bin_gnome-shell.1000*
-rw-r- 1 ph1jbwhoopsie 57293630 May 14 14:37
_usr_bin_gnome-shell.1000.crash
-rw-r--r-- 1 ph1jbwhoopsie0 May 14 14:37
_usr_bin_gnome-shell.1000.upload
-rw--- 1 whoopsie whoopsie 37 May 14 14:37
_usr_bin_gnome-shell.1000.uploaded
root@ssfdt0:/var/crash# cat _usr_bin_gnome-shell.1000.uploaded
1daf1616-11f7-11ef-9df5-fa163ec44ecd
root@ssfdt0:/var/crash#
Kind Regards
Julian
On 14/05/2024 13:35, Daniel van Vugt wrote:
> Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
>
I use Eclipse IDE
gnome-shell crashes
1. when I drag and drop a panel
2. when I click a link in a pop-up
May 12 09:05:49 ssfdt0 gnome-shell[2628]: Window manager warning: Ping serial
11101399 was reused for window 0x22000f4, previous use was for window 0x22000ac.
May 12 10:08:44 ssfdt0
So if you turn on Debug::pkgAcquire::Worker you should probably see it
fail after a @ Queue: Action combined for
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2003851
Title:
occasional hanging
The important point to note is that fetchAfter==0 is the default case if
we did not get retries, so every non-retried item has that value and we
don't want to cycle it. The loop's purpose is to find the smallest
timeout to wait for, as an _optimization_ to the select() call below,
such that if we
We're going to need to fix this properly rather than busy cycle the
queues outside the select loop.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2003851
Title:
occasional hanging 'apt-get update'
** Package changed: grub2 (Ubuntu) => casper (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065315
Title:
NOBLE 24.04 Persistence is not enabled
To manage notifications about this bug go
Acknowledge. We need to identify a key package and see whether it
changes suites compared to the os-release. Usually that's base-files on
Debian.
I'll add this to my apt 3.0 UX improvements list.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Triaged
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
Done! https://github.com/canonical/Ubuntu-Sans-fonts/issues/117
** Bug watch added: github.com/canonical/Ubuntu-Sans-fonts/issues #117
https://github.com/canonical/Ubuntu-Sans-fonts/issues/117
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
** Also affects: fonts-ubuntu (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064054
Title:
Chinese characters displayed incorrectly in Ubuntu
This maybe something relate to the default font for Chinese characters
in Ubuntu 24.04.
After set custom font to `Monospace` or `Noto Sans CJK` in perferences
of gnome-text-editor, the problem auto solved, while with `Ubuntu Mono`
or `Ubuntu Sans`, the problem exist.
--
You received this bug
arate attachment" here.
Best regards,
Julian Bechtold
+ ---
+ ProblemType: Bug
+ ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu2
+ Architecture: amd64
+ CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
+ CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
+ DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
+ InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-04-26 (1
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064906/+attachment/5775550/+files/ProcEnviron.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064906
appearing. I can now watch youtube on full screen
most of the time but playing a game for instance still does not work
As for the requested kernel information, I cannot find how to attach a
"separate attachment" here.
Best regards,
Julian Bechtold
** Affects: ubuntu
Importance:
Removing the block-proposed tag for oracular
** Tags removed: block-proposed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060721
Title:
APT 2.8.0: Promote weak key warnings to errors
To manage
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2063094 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063094
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2063094
unattended-upgrades is running forever
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
bubblewrap should be won't fix per comment #91 from jjohansen
** Changed in: bubblewrap (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046844
Title:
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Nick Rosbrook (enr0n) => (unassigned)
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
** Tags added: rls-nn-notfixing
--
You received this bug notification because you
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061214
Title:
[SRU] Software Sources is not compatible with deb822
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Actually, I am not sure is this a bug specific to gnome-text-editor,
because all kinds of text editor are affected. I only choose gnome-text-
editor for reporting the bug.
** Description changed:
Some Chinese characters, such as enumeration comma(、) and full stop(。),
displayed incorrectly in
** Description changed:
- Some Chinese characters, such as colon(、) and full stop(。), displayed
- incorrectly in text-editor including gnome-text-editor, zim-wiki, and
- sublime-text etc. While in firefox every displayed without problem.
+ Some Chinese characters, such as enumeration comma(、) and
If users had installed both, any configuration made by ufw would have
been persisted by the -persistent packages and hence would be restored
by it.
They inadvertently had no Conflicts relationship declared, but sure
enough conflicted in practice.
There doesn't seem to be a reason why you'd
** Description changed:
- Upgrade from Jammy to Noble breaks iptables-persistent and netfilter-
- persistent firewall configuration if ufw is also installed pre-upgrade.
+ [Impact]
+ Upgrade from Jammy to Noble breaks iptables-persistent and
netfilter-persistent firewall configuration if ufw is
1 - 100 of 11569 matches
Mail list logo
