The documentation for bionic mentions the new option,
"debian-installer/add-kernel-opts":
https://help.ubuntu.com/lts/installation-guide/amd64/apbs04.html
Note however that there is a mention of "if supported by the bootloader
installer".
Andrew: can you post full preseed file?
There is also a
@iGadget: Ended up here for the exact same reason. Removing iptraf
completely from the repos would have made me search for it. I guess I
would have found iptraf-ng. We could also tag iptraf-ng as providing
iptraf.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Any update on when the updated kernel parameters can make it to official
cloud images?
Also worth noting, OpenStack image docs [1] also indicate ttyS0 at
115200n8.
1: https://docs.openstack.org/image-guide/openstack-images.html#ensure-
image-writes-boot-log-to-console
--
You received this bug
xenial's pxelinux provides "/usr/lib/PXELINUX/pxelinux.0" instead.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1570915
Title:
installing syslinux doesn't provide /usr/lib/syslinux/pxelinux.0
To
I can confirm that the following kernel boots fine with 2048M allocated
to the virtual machine:
# uname -a
Linux testlucid 2.6.32-33-generic-pae #66-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jun 7 20:02:23 UTC
2011 i686 GNU/Linux
# dpkg -l | grep linux-image-2.6.32-33
ii linux-image-2.6.32-33-generic-pae 2.6.32-33.66
Looks highly related to Debian bug report 621072: http://bugs.debian.org
/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=621072
Bastian over there reverted commit
67e87f0a1c5cbc750f81ebf6a128e8ff6f4376cc
(https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/252321/) and it worked for them.
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker
This bug also affects 2.6.32-32 for Lucid.
It is also easily reproduced using Debian Squeeze + Xen 4.0.
Here is a list of what we tested:
Ubuntu Lucid VM on 2.6.32-31, 2G RAM -- Works
Ubuntu Lucid VM on 2.6.32-32, 2G RAM -- Fails
Ubuntu Lucid VM on 2.6.32-32, 500MB -- Works
Steps to reproduce:
The value for my setup is not 512MB.
Here are my test results using a Ubuntu Lucid VM on 2.6.32-32:
512MOK
576MOK
578MOK
579MBAD
580MBAD
584MBAD
592MBAD
608MBAD
640MBAD
768MBAD
1024M BAD
2048M BAD
--
You received this bug notification because you are
Exact same results (579MB = no boot) on a different distro (custom
built) for the host and a freshly installed Ubuntu Lucid on 2.6.32-32.
** Summary changed:
- Ubuntu 10.04 freeze on boot when using more than 512M in Xenserver / Xen
+ Ubuntu 10.04 freeze on boot when using more than 578M in
When mdadm is installed from the CD during install or upgrade, it does
not pull in any MTA, only when it is manually added later.
I have to disagree with you there. If I install mdadm during the installation
postfix gets pulled in. I can easily reproduce it (see my earlier post).
However, if
Note to anyone trying to make this work, we are using these lines in
preseed/late_command:
sed -i 's/\(GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT=\).*/\1\\/g'
/target/etc/default/grub; \
in-target bash -c 'update-grub'; \
To set GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT to . I read in another bug that the
intended
I just noticed LP truncated my line in 2. Make sure both are on
individual lines and there is not space next to the backslash.
--
grub-installer ignores grub2/linux_cmdline_default in preseed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/581796
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Dennis,
This problem only appears when partitioning the hard disk drive using
the new Ubuntu. If you are upgrading from an earlier version using the
supported method (update manager), then the problem is probably
somewhere else. However, if you completely reinstalled using the new CD,
you could
Hi Scar,
The problem/feature made it into the release installer, but it has been noted
in the release notes. Consider yourself lucky to be able to change it to IDE
mode and clean the partitions.
To confirm this is the problem you have described, try installing Ubuntu from a
preseed file
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: grub-installer
Installing newest Ubuntu Lucid using latest netboot image.
Using a preseed file to setup a software RAID system.
A specific question gets asked (see screenshot) : Do you want to boot your
system if your RAID becomes degraded?
This
** Attachment added: Screen shot 2010-04-14 at 6.23.23 PM.png
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44286490/Screen%20shot%202010-04-14%20at%206.23.23%20PM.png
--
preseeded grub-installer/bootdev ignored by grub-installer
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563953
You received this bug notification
** Attachment added: lucid-public-preseed
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44286738/lucid-public-preseed
--
preseeded grub-installer/bootdev ignored by grub-installer
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563953
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
I'd like to confirm that this fixes the problem on all symptomatic
systems I have used here. Thanks a lot for fixing this in such a short
time!
--
BIOS hang - Unable to boot after installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551965
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
I now understand why the preseeding did not take effect :)
I installed using the special debug boot parameter, I attached the installer
syslog.
** Attachment added: ubuntulucidraiddebug-syslog
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44309805/ubuntulucidraiddebug-syslog
--
preseeded
The recommended automatically installs postfix in a preseeded
alternate cd installation (or netboot installer) where you have
software raid (mdadm gets installed, and recommends are automatically
installed).
--
mdadm installs postfix
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/379882
You received this bug
I think I should preseed the answer to mdadm/boot_degraded to true (testing it
ATM)
I think it's related to bug 268580.
--
preseeded grub-installer/bootdev ignored by grub-installer
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563953
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Confirmed! This fixes the question!
Thanks for your time Colin!
--
preseeded grub-installer/bootdev ignored by grub-installer
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563953
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
Sorry I should have been clearer, I used lucid's latest netboot, with
the preseed file I attached.
** Attachment added: ubuntu-lucid-raid-preseed.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44352396/ubuntu-lucid-raid-preseed.txt
--
mdadm installs postfix
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/379882
You
Excerpt of installer's syslog with debconf debugging turned on:
Apr 15 17:15:31 in-target: debconf (developer): starting
/usr/bin/debconf-apt-progress --no-progress --logstderr -- apt-get -q -y
--no-remove install mdadm
Apr 15 17:15:31 in-target: debconf (developer): -- GET debconf/priority
Apr
** Changed in: grub-installer (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
preseeded grub-installer/bootdev ignored by grub-installer
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563953
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
We can forget about this request, last point release for 8.04 passed and
it is not really backport-worthy
** Changed in: hardy-backports
Status: New = Incomplete
** Changed in: hardy-backports
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
libdata-validate-ip-perl / libdesktop-notify-perl not
I can confirm that the setup works on my ASUS M4A78-EM with the SATA controller
set to SATA mode (which is listed as
00:11.0 SATA controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB700/SB800 SATA Controller [IDE
mode]) and in AHCI mode (which is listed as [AHCI mode]).
The disks are detected fine.
The module
Adding the line to my preseed file *WORKED* on my main affected test machine.
I'm going to test all other affected systems tomorrow to make 100%, but I'm
pretty sure that fixed the problem!
--
BIOS hang - Unable to boot after installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551965
You received this
The easiest way would be to check using a working system (say from 9.10
or a working 10.04 install). I think I can still have access to an ASUS
M4A78-EM motherboard, using the AMD780 chipset. I'll get back to you
soon.
--
most PATA/SATA modules missing in Lucid netboot
Next to Marcos' article, I decided to try the Gigabyte 965GM-S2
motherboard and can confirm it is also affected (only when connected to
the Intel ICH8 controller). I did not expect this from an Intel AHCI
BIOS. See attached screenshot.
** Attachment added: Screen shot 2010-04-12 at 9.27.37 AM.png
Sure! Thanks!
--
BIOS hang - Unable to boot after installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551965
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
You said to boot the installer with this option, does that mean I *must*
provide this as a kernel boot option or I can provide it in my preseed file
like this:
d-i partman/alignment select cylinder
(I guessed select by your commit to partman-base at
Have you updated your kernel + initrd files on your PXE server? As soon as the
files were rebuilt they worked for me (using the AHCI module).
I think some modules might not work correctly? Try switching to a terminal and
type modprobe modulename.
--
most PATA/SATA modules missing in Lucid
Used Fedora 13 installation's fdisk (from util-linux 2.71.1), switched
the DOS compatibility flag to off (as recommended per the prompt) and
the units to sectors (again, recommended).
-Booted Fedora 13 installation CD.
-At the disk partitions step, switched to console 1 or 2 and started fdisk.
Here's the partition table listing from fdisk using the flags mentioned in the
previous post (dos compatibility flag off, units to sectors).
This is from a working 10.04 system installed using the preseed recipe:
Disk /dev/sda: 160.0 GB, 160041885696 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 19457
I guess that would be the error message on a Gigabyte.
Tomorrow I'll try to see if we have any old pentium 4 gigabyte motherboards
laying around to test it!
--
BIOS hang - Unable to boot after installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551965
You received this bug notification because you are
Great read but here my drives are not using 4 KiB sectors. The page says
Fedora 13 uses the new libparted, supporting 4KiB sectors. I will
install it on this machine to see if it's affected too.
Thanks Marcos
--
BIOS hang - Unable to boot after installation
** Package changed: ubuntu = partman-base (Ubuntu)
--
BIOS hang - Unable to boot after installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551965
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Manual install with my custom partitions gave me the same thing...
primary /boot 200M
logical swap 2G
logical /tmp 2G
logical / rest
I think this has something to do with the BIOS and the MBR...
--
BIOS hang - Unable to boot after installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551965
You received
More updates...
Copying the first 446 bytes (GRUB 2 in the MBR) onto a fresh disk passes the
BIOS.
Copying the first 512 bytes (GRUB 2 + partition table) onto a fresh disk makes
it hang.
The problem is related to the partition table.
Here's the output for my partition recipe on Ubuntu 8.04 vs
Here's parted list command, using stock versions (so 1.7.1 for 8.04
and 2.2 for 10.04):
8.04:
(parted) print
Disk /dev/sda: 160GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos
Number Start End SizeType
Possibly related to #530071 ?
--
BIOS hang - Unable to boot after installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551965
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Added Colin to subscribers since this is related to a recent update.
Don't hesitate to unsubscribe if this is unrelated, but I somehow think
it is.
--
BIOS hang - Unable to boot after installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551965
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Older boards might not like the new partitioning, see bug 551965
--
Lucid Default live-cd install fails with 4K sector / Advanced Format drives
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530071
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
I can confirm this fixes the problem. Thanks again Colin!
--
most PATA/SATA modules missing in Lucid netboot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/546929
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Public bug reported:
I am preparing for deployment of Ubuntu 10.04 on servers. We deploy Ubuntu
using the netboot image, on a PXE server.
Two particular systems have been troublesome for us. Note that we are using the
latest netboot image (dated from this morning).
Steps to reproduce:
-Boot on
** Attachment added: Preseed file used for installation
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42529398/ubuntu-lucid-plain.pxe
--
BIOS hang - Unable to boot after installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551965
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Attachment added: BIOS hung at disk detection
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42529326/Screen%20shot%202010-03-30%20at%202.46.06%20PM.png
--
BIOS hang - Unable to boot after installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551965
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
*update* Installing without preseed, using guided defaults and all default
settings *works* fine.
Now, what in my preseed file make it fail on older boards and work on newer
ones?
--
BIOS hang - Unable to boot after installation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551965
You received this bug
Switched to ext4 and added these lines before grub-install/only_debian:
d-i grub-installer/grub2_instead_of_grub_legacy boolean true
d-i grub-installer/make_active boolean true
Still not working.
I can't find what's wrong with my preseed... The weirdest part is that
the preseed works
Tomorrow I'll test and let you know. Thanks for the great work Colin!
--
most PATA/SATA modules missing in Lucid netboot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/546929
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I can confirm this affects the ahci module too.
--
most PATA/SATA modules missing in Lucid netboot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/546929
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I agree with #19. We need more verbose in a server environment in case
things go wrong.
--
Graphical Ubuntu logo enabled on servers, no more login prompt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/506297
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
53 matches
Mail list logo
