Resolved it with:
sudo apt install python3-click-package=0.4.43+16.04.20160203-0ubuntu2
gir1.2-click-0.4=0.4.43+16.04.20160203-0ubuntu2
libclick-0.4-0=0.4.43+16.04.20160203-0ubuntu2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
SInce today I can not install anything in 16.04 due to unmet dependencies with
click. I'd like to remove it, but that fails:
---
The following packages will be REMOVED
click*
0 to upgrade, 0 to newly install, 1 to remove and 0 not to upgrade.
3 not fully installed or
Exact same problem here. cryptsetup with tcrypt volume stopped working
since update to 3.19.0-56. (-51was fine).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1558079
Title:
cryptsetup tcryptOpen
Seems the reporter did not not run apport-collect. Should I open another
bug then?
** Summary changed:
- cryptsetup tcryptOpen doesn't work anymode
+ cryptsetup tcryptOpen doesn't work anymore
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Booted up previous version, 3.19.0-51 and I confirm cryptsetup works fine with
tcrypt volume. So the bug has been introduced in 3.19.0-56 it seems.
Can always open volume with other tools, like truecrypt. So the problem is not
in the volume either.
Any info I could provide to help?
** Changed
I tried the latest kernel (4.5.0-040500-generic) in a VM, and cryptsetup
does open fine a truecrypt disk.
** Tags added: kernel-fixed-upstream
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1558079
Same in Ubuntu 14.04. It is quite problematic since some applications
can't be used anymore. For example DavMail. Is there any plan from the
Unity team to bring back the whitelist feature?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
No, that is a different bug.
It is the navigation through directories which is slow, not the file transfer
itself:
The trivial example I gave is easy to reproduce. There is a lot of unnecessary
samba traffic that slows down the navigation.
Seb
--
Slow CIFS navigation
apport information
** Tags added: apport-collected
** Description changed:
On Karmic, with 2.6.31-20, I have noticed an important decrease of
performances while navigating CIFS shares (with mount.cifs) on a Windows
2003 server. (Compared to a older installation with 2.6.27-8).
apport information
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50674595/BootDmesg.txt
--
Slow CIFS navigation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571235
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
apport information
** Attachment added: CRDA.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50674596/CRDA.txt
--
Slow CIFS navigation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571235
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
apport information
** Attachment added: Card0.Amixer.values.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50674597/Card0.Amixer.values.txt
--
Slow CIFS navigation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571235
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
apport information
** Attachment added: Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50674598/Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt
--
Slow CIFS navigation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571235
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
apport information
** Attachment added: Card0.Codecs.codec.1.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50674599/Card0.Codecs.codec.1.txt
--
Slow CIFS navigation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571235
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
apport information
** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50674600/CurrentDmesg.txt
--
Slow CIFS navigation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571235
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
apport information
** Attachment added: IwConfig.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50674601/IwConfig.txt
--
Slow CIFS navigation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571235
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
apport information
** Attachment added: Lspci.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50674602/Lspci.txt
--
Slow CIFS navigation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571235
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
apport information
** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50674603/Lsusb.txt
--
Slow CIFS navigation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571235
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
apport information
** Attachment added: PciMultimedia.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50674604/PciMultimedia.txt
--
Slow CIFS navigation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571235
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
apport information
** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50674606/ProcInterrupts.txt
--
Slow CIFS navigation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571235
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
apport information
** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50674605/ProcCpuinfo.txt
--
Slow CIFS navigation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571235
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
apport information
** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50674607/ProcModules.txt
--
Slow CIFS navigation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571235
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
apport information
** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50674610/UdevLog.txt
--
Slow CIFS navigation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571235
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
apport information
** Attachment added: WifiSyslog.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50674612/WifiSyslog.txt
--
Slow CIFS navigation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571235
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
apport information
** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50674608/UdevDb.txt
--
Slow CIFS navigation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571235
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
OK, to clarify this bug. It is a regression. It was fine in the previous LTS
8.04.
In 10.04, browsing of CIFS shares is much slower due to excessive
QUERY_PATH_INFO requests as documented in the original bug description. It is
easily reproducible. You just need another computer running Windows,
Public bug reported:
With 10.04, CIFS now supports DFS roots. However after a while, while
navigating the shares, I often get a complete freeze.
===
Jun 21 10:56:59 seb-laptop kernel: [ 2312.223194] CIFS VFS: No response for
cmd 50 mid 9741
Jun 21 10:57:01 seb-laptop kernel: [ 2314.209579]
Public bug reported:
On Karmic, with 2.6.31-20, I have noticed an important decrease of
performances while navigating CIFS shares (with mount.cifs) on a Windows
2003 server. (Compared to a older installation with 2.6.27-8).
Navigating means here either using midnight commander, ls -l (with ls
I also think that package smbfs should depend on keyutils. Suggesting it is not
enough. Many people installing smbfs will connect to DFS, and that won't work
without keyutils installed. That is the cause of bug#134080:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/134080
Seb.
--
Cifs
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
Cifs mount fails when DFS referrals are used by server, keyutils needed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/493565
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid = In Progress
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = Confirmed
--
CIFS: Navigating directories in DFS shares buggy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134080
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
I also think that package smbfs should depend on keyutils. Suggesting it is not
enough. Many people installing smbfs will connect to DFS, and that won't work
without keyutils installed. That is the cause of bug#134080:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/134080
Seb.
--
Cifs
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
Cifs mount fails when DFS referrals are used by server, keyutils needed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/493565
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid = In Progress
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = Confirmed
--
CIFS: Navigating directories in DFS shares buggy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134080
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
/cifs.upcall %k
The second line seems important here, the first one is for kerberos.
man cifs.upcall to get more info.
Could someone with Karmic and access to a Windows DFS server try that?
Se6.
--
CIFS: Navigating directories in DFS shares buggy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134080
You received
/cifs.upcall %k
The second line seems important here, the first one is for kerberos.
man cifs.upcall to get more info.
Could someone with Karmic and access to a Windows DFS server try that?
Se6.
--
CIFS: Navigating directories in DFS shares buggy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134080
You received
Hi,
I also have a ALC861 based integrated sound card:
lspci -vv | grep -i audio
00:10.1 Audio device: nVidia Corporation MCP51 High Definition Audio (rev a2)
aplay -l
List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices
card 0: NVidia [HDA NVidia], device 0: ALC861 Analog [ALC861 Analog]
Subdevices:
37 matches
Mail list logo