On 31/12/2021 21:53, Andreas Tille wrote:
> [...]
> Sorry, but I do not understand the problem. What config files are you
> talking about? What is "upgrade-system"? I'm using the command
> `deborphan` itself just to learn what package might be a potential
> candidate for removal. From time to
On 31/12/2021 12:23, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> Those defaults work for the majority of people.
>
> Settings can be changed as desired by editing the configuration file.
>
> ** Changed in: upgrade-system (Ubuntu)
> Status: New => Won't Fix
Hi, Marin.
I *have* edited the configuration
Public bug reported:
The "upgrade-system" utility makes keeping Ubuntu/Debian systems up-to-
date very easy, but the default settings for "deborphan" result in too
many packages being removed. This can be avoided by changing the
default:
diff -Naur upgrade-system.conf upgrade-system.conf.dist
This is the error running rmlint with the default 16 PB value:
ajt@pilot:~$ rmlint --no-with-color -T duplicates --see-symlinks
--partial-hidden -c sh:handler=remove --hardlinked --crossdev --size
1-18446744073709551615 --max-depth 512 -o json -c json:oneline
/home/ajt/Documents/Work/Minke
Public bug reported:
There is a bug in the default max file size of 16 Petabytes in
"Shredder" being interpreted as a negative number and causing an error
exit when "rmlint" is run by the GUI when the selected folder is
scanned. In addition, simply changing the Units from e.g. Petabyte to
On 20/08/2021 22:08, carlosLang wrote:
> Same happens to me, using X2GO, connecting to Ubuntu 20.04 in WSL2.
>
> This worked for me:
> Control Center > Look and Feel > Mate Teak > Windows > Window Manager
> Select: Marco (no composition)
>
> It removes the thick border, leaving a very thin one.
Changing the URL from ftp:// to http:// allowed me to download the file
successfully:
wget
http://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/snp/organisms/human_9606_b151_GRCh38p7/VCF/All_20180418.vcf.gz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Please note: I ran "ubuntu-bug" on the system running "wget" 1.19.4
under Ubuntu-MATE 18.04 LTS, but I reported the bug using Firefox
running under Ubuntu-MATE 20.04 LTS
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
In normal use, downloading small files, "wget" 1.19.4 works correctly
under Ubuntu-MATE 18.04 LTS. The length and md5sums of downloaded files
are correct. However, when attempting to download a larger 16GB .tar.gz
file the length of the original file on the server is
Same issue with /var/log/btmp and same fix: Comment out the entry in
/etc/logrotate.conf
root@sei:/etc# !diff
diff -Naur logrotate.conf.dist logrotate.conf
--- logrotate.conf.dist 2017-08-21 19:38:26.0 +0200
+++ logrotate.conf 2021-02-16 02:09:31.665145104 +0100
@@ -19,18 +19,18 @@
Public bug reported:
The cron.daily job reports an error running logrotate:
/etc/cron.daily/logrotate:
error: /etc/logrotate.conf:22 duplicate log entry for /var/log/wtmp
There is a duplicate entry for "wtmp" in:
/etc/logrotate.conf
/etc/logrotate.d/wtmp
Fix: Comment out the entry in
Public bug reported:
The "mafft" program hangs waiting for "disttbfast" to exit, but in some
cases "disttbfast" does not exit after many days. This problem only
seems to occur with a particular alignment of virus sequences:
/usr/bin/mafft --inputorder --adjustdirection --thread 4 --auto
Public bug reported:
The file "10-link-restrictions.conf" is listed in DEBIAN/conffiles in
the binary deb package, and the file is present/installed, but it is
removed by the "postinst" script resulting in "debsums" flagging it as a
missing config file:
root@beluga:~# lsb_release -d
Description:
Re: my comment #10 - After re-installing the purged packages the problem
was, of course, not fixed. However, a fix that does work has been
suggested in Bug #1866372:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/1866372
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Richard's magic work-around WFM:
apt purge --reinstall plymouth
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following package was automatically installed and is no longer required:
libplymouth5
Use 'apt autoremove' to remove it.
The
Confirming this bug: "python3" installed, but "python" command not found
after I upgraded my Ubuntu-MATE 18.04 to 20.04. I realise that Python 2
is being deprecated in 20.04, but there should be a default "python"
command, so I added a Debian alternative:
update-alternatives --install
The BUG appears to be caused when the NCBI environment variable is
undefined. Setting NCBI to the installed location of the default config
file under Ubuntu fixes the problem:
> ajt@beluga:~$ export NCBI=/etc/ncbi
> ajt@beluga:~$ strace blastn |& fgrep .ncbirc
> stat("./.ncbirc", 0x7ffc01d0e2c0)
Public bug reported:
While attempting to use NCBI "blastn" from behind a proxy, I traced the
execution of "blastn" to check if it was reading the default
"/etc/ncbi/.ncbirc" config file where I put my proxy config because it
wasn't working.
In fact, the default config file is never stat'ed or
Public bug reported:
Re: "glances" DISK I/O display under Ubuntu 18.04 LTS and Linux 5.0.0
HWE kernel
There is a bug in _pslinux.py present in both python-psutil and
python3-psutil packages that prevents "glances" from displaying disk i/o
activity:
lsb_release -d
Description:Ubuntu 18.04.3
Hi, Robie.
Tested install from bionic-proposed under Ubuntu-MATE 18.04.2 LTS with
4.18.0-20-generic kernel:
Install was successful, and no errors reported.
Thanks,
Tony.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1777165 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1777165
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1777165
package metaphlan2 2.7.5-1 [modified: usr/share/metaphlan2/_metaphlan2.py]
failed to install/upgrade: installed metaphlan2 package
Same problem running with Java 1.8.0_181 under Ubuntu-MATE 18.04 LTS,
but the stand-alone IGV_2.4.14 works correctly. However, the required
classes are in the igv.jar file in the stand-alone version.
The class is installed:
ls -l /usr/share/java/commons-io.jar
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 214351 Feb
If the X-axis is %time for the benchmark read/write then why does it typically
decrease over time?
Surely the X-axis is the read/write speed at different positions 0-100% across
the disk, like access time?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Public bug reported:
Already reported by me and Fixed by Andreas Tille in the Debian-Med
team.
Python3 syntax is used in _metaphlan2.py, but "pycompile" run by the
"postinst" script only supports Python2. Fixed by adding "print()" and
removing function annotations:
/usr/share/metaphlan2# diff
The Tyan S3992-E hardware issue I encountered attempting to use an
nVidia GTX1060 is that this motherboard only supports PCI Express x16
Gen1 but the GTX1060 requires Gen2/3 and is not detected by the nVidia
or Nouveau kernel drivers. However, a GTX460 graphics card and a Tesla
C2050 GPGPU are
I've updated the bug description because this appears to be a Tyan
S3992-E motherboard hardware issue. The product info for the S3992-E
motherboard says it doesn't support PCI-e graphics cards:
http://www.tyan.com/Motherboards_S3992-E_S3992G3NR-E
However, I've been using nVidia C2050 GPGPU
** No longer affects: ubuntu-mate
** Description changed:
- I've just upgraded from Ubuntu-MATE 14.04 to 16.04 and my nVidia GTX
- 1060 stopped working!
-
- The Ubuntu 4.10 HWE kernel does not support the nVidia GTX 1060 display,
- either using "nouveau" or "nvidia-384" drivers. The 4.4 GA
On 13/11/17 17:32, Phillip Susi wrote:
> I noticed that you have partitioned the raid array, which is unusual.
> Can you try using just /dev/md0 for / with no partition table on it?
Hi, Philip.
I've used the same method of installing to a partitioned "md" RAID for
many years on non-EFI 'legacy'
On 01/11/17 14:29, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
> You may need to run the following from a terminal:
>
> sudo apt-get install -f
> sudo apt-get clean
> sudo apt-get update
>
> Then re-install the package or updates.
>
> If that does not resolve your issue, please mark the bug as "Confirmed"
Hi,
Public bug reported:
Attempting to install with nVidia GTX1060 graphics card
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: linux-image-extra-4.4.0-98-generic 4.4.0-98.121
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-98.121-generic 4.4.90
Uname: Linux 4.4.0-98-generic x86_64
ApportVersion:
On 25/10/17 13:52, Phillip Susi wrote:
> Which partition did you choose to mount in /boot/efi?
Hi,
/boot/efi is on /dev/sda1:
> root@sei:~# df -h /boot/efi
> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/sda1 511M 3.4M 508M 1% /boot/efi
Disks present:
> root@sei:~# lsscsi
>
Hi, Steve.
The 64-bit Ubuntu-MATE system that I installed to "md" RAID1 is working
fine.
I filed a bug report in response to the automatic invitation from the
crash handler.
Please let me know where I could find anything else that might explain
the crash?
Thanks,
Tony.
--
You received
Not sure it will be useful, but this is all I could find:
/var/log/apt/history.log
Start-Date: 2017-10-14 18:33:16
Commandline: apt-get --no-upgrade -o
Acquire::gpgv::Options::=--ignore-time-conflict -y install shim-signed
Install: shim-signed:amd64
Public bug reported:
# manually installed "mdadm" after installer crashed when trying to install to
md RAID1 in EFI mode:
debian_chroot=CHROOT chroot /target
apt update
apt install mdadm
update-initramfs -uk all
# rebooted successfully in EFI mode
Shim crash alert, but system still running and
Public bug reported:
EFI install to md RAID1 with separate FAT32 /boot/efi partition
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: ubiquity 2.21.63.4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-28.32~16.04.2-generic 4.10.17
Uname: Linux 4.10.0-28-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.10
Public bug reported:
# Boot from Ubuntu 16.0.4 LTS USB-stick
# Try Ubuntu without installing
# Terminal on the live USB desktop
sudo -i
apt update
apt install mdadm
for i in /dev/sd[acde]; do parted $i -- mklabel msdos; done
for i in /dev/sd[acde]; do parted $i -- unit MiB mkpart primary 0%
[precide] I mean "precise"
Fix is to disable the "precide-updates" repository:
root@wildcat:/etc/apt/sources.list.d# apt-cache policy
linux-image-3.13.0-63-generic
linux-image-3.13.0-63-generic:
Installed: 3.13.0-63.103
Candidate: 3.13.0-63.103
Version table:
*** 3.13.0-63.103 0
This bug is due to a newer release of the kernel in precide-updates than
trusty-updates, but it will only occur if you have both the "precise"
and "trusty" repositories enabled (which I have because I'm using
libtiff4):
root@wildcat:/var/lib/dpkg/info# apt-cache policy
Meizu Mk4 Ubuntu Edition runnubg Ubuntu 15.04r3
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1332866
Title:
Voicemail indication appears even though I have no voicemail
To manage notifications
I have the same problem on O2 in the UK
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1332866
Title:
Voicemail indication appears even though I have no voicemail
To manage notifications about this
Same problem booting from a degraded RAID6 under Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS.
RAID6 is total 4TB, with an MSDOS disk label (first partition is 2TB)
Booted fine when fully sync'ed, but failed to boot when degraded.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Although this bug is fixed, the same symptoms appear when using the
default apparmor configuration if user accounts are not stored in /home.
For example, if accounts are stored in /homes this path needs to be
added to the apparmour configuration:
--- /etc/apparmor.d/tunables/.old/home 2012-06-05
Public bug reported:
I used sshfs to mount a remote filesystem in my home directory and it
was backed up by Deja-Dup. I should, of course, have added the mount-
point in my home directory to the exclude list, but I didn't realise
until the backup had been running for hours and many GB had been
Public bug reported:
Manually created a partitionable md RAID6
Installer crashed trying to install GRUB in all component devices
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: ubiquity 2.10.16
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-23.36-generic 3.2.14
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-23-generic x86_64
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1005820
Title:
Installing Desktop edition to md RAID6
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971697
Title:
unity-greeter crashed with SIGSEGV in g_main_context_dispatch() can't
login, looping back to greeter
When input focus is set to password entry field in the Greeter window by
mouse-click before the greeter crashes, the Greeter stops looping
(crashing) and the Unity desktop appears: Confirmed this behaviour twice
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Same behaviour with/without ATI proprietary driver in use
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971697
Title:
unity-greeter crashed with SIGSEGV in g_main_context_dispatch() can't
login,
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 971697 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971697
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 971697
unity-greeter crashed with SIGSEGV in g_main_context_dispatch() can't login,
looping back to greeter
--
You
** Also affects: ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816180
Title:
6.3/4 XGI Volari V3XT/V5/V8 display failure
To manage notifications
Although the XGI device is detected by xorg, no driver is loaded because the
SiS driver has now replaced the XGI driver.
This can be solved by directing the xgi identifier to the sis driver in
(lucid) /usr/lib/X11/xorg.conf.d/09-xgi.conf:
Section Device
Identifier xgi
Driver sis
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 816180 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816180
This is an old bug, but is still present in Lucid (10.04 LTS), Maverick
(10.10) and Oneric (11.10)
Tony.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 816180
6.3/4 XGI Volari V3XT/V5/V8 display
Correction: The second path is for Oneric (11.10)
/usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d/09-xgi.conf
[In Maverick it's the same as Lucid]
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816180
Title:
6.3/4
On 04/10/11 09:40, Colin Law wrote:
On 4 October 2011 09:35, **johnbrid...@yahoo.com wrote:
I've just had a questionnaire from Which about their magazine and I took the
opportunity to suggest they should do a proper evaluation of Ubuntu (and/or
Mint) rather than their usual dismissal that it's
On 04/10/11 10:26, Alan Pope wrote:
On 4 October 2011 10:05, Tony Travisa.tra...@abdn.ac.uk wrote:
I second that, but can we take this opportunity to call it FLOSS instead
because this more accurately reflects what Ubuntu is about.
FLOSS is (in my opinion) the worst of all the labels we
On 12/08/11 19:17, Barry Drake wrote:
Overall, I'm pleased that the next release goes back to Thunderbird - I
think it has better possibilities. But, one area I miss is the apparent
lack of control over the sending fields. On Evolution, I was able to
set my sending to use another server than the
On 26/07/11 14:58, Chris Rowson wrote:
I thought I'd just put this out there because I can't seem to find any
information... Hopefully one of you good people will know :-)
Does smbfs run any kind of error checking/correction on during
transfer of data to SMB shares on Windows machines? I'm
On 12/06/11 07:45, john beddard wrote:
I guess everyone is aware of the Ubunchu Manga comic for young people
new to Ubuntu : https://seotch.wordpress.com/2009/04/04/ubunchu01/
The Michigan LoCo have been using this Manga to really good effect.
Hi, John.
I've not seen it before - Brilliant!
Swan for Bio-Linux 2.0 17/3/2003#
# Updated for Bio-Linux 5 by Tim Booth 1/8/2008 #
# Updated to perform Quarterly ETOH backups by Tony Travis 17/7/2009 #
# Updated to dump ext4 fileystems by Tony Travis 19/5/2010
On 08/05/11 13:46, Liam Proven wrote:
[...]
He has a whole bunch of machines like this:
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Fujitsu-Siemens-Celsius-R610-Xeon-3-06GHz-648MB-RAM-/270743834477?pt=UK_Computing_Networking_SMhash=item3f09970f6d
... for just £30, and for even less:
Hi, Liam.
Yes, these are real
On 13/03/11 17:36, mac wrote:
On 13/03/2011 15:28, Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote:
I've used 1 and 1 for some years now - £0.69 per month for 5 mailboxes,
IMAP supplied AND they use Linux to host it on...
Thanks for the info, Gordon, and thanks to everyone for the help and
information. I've
On 13/02/11 11:51, Sean Miller wrote:
[...]
When it actually came to costings, including support, there really
wasn't ANY difference at all in the total cost of ownership.In fact,
a supported JBOSS worked out to be FAR from the cheapest, as other
vendors offered free support alongside the
On 14/01/11 22:31, Jacob Mansfield wrote:
I have been trying to set up an LDAP server for some time now. when I
finally found an up-to-date tutorial at
http://www.zarafa.com/wiki/index.php/Zarafa_LDAP_cn_config_How_To the
first step of this has worked fine however when running the command
On 18/01/11 16:40, Jacob Mansfield wrote:
it's the new version of slapd in the repos, there isn't a
/etc/ldap/slapd.conf
Hi, Jacob.
OK, but...
Using slapd.conf
It is possible to fall back to the old config method with a slapd.conf config
file. The default init script of Ubuntu 10.04.1
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: coreutils
This is a follow-up to [Bug 675613], where dpkg stalled attempting to
sync() and the sync binary then stalled when run manually. A similar
problem occurred on the same machine when my backup script ran the
sync binary. This machine has beebn
--
sync binary stalls during backup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/677415
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
On 16/11/10 15:32, C de-Avillez wrote:
I would keep this bug open; now that you have clarified the bio-linux
setup, there should not be an issue keeping it open. Now, I do hope you
agree that the bio-linux pages are sort of lacking on details -- most
importantly, I could not find a reference
apport information
** Tags added: apport-collected
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: coreutils
This is a follow-up to [Bug 675613], where dpkg stalled attempting to
sync() and the sync binary then stalled when run manually. A similar
problem occurred on the same machine
I think the same sync() problem underlies dpkg problems reported in
[Bug 537241]
--
dpkg hangs during sync under 2.6.32-25-server kernel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
And also sync() problems in [Bug 624229]
--
dpkg hangs during sync under 2.6.32-25-server kernel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
On 16/11/10 00:07, C de-Avillez wrote:
I just noticed you are running bio-linux, *not* Ubuntu itself. I am not
sure what changes the bio-linux providers have made in regard to a
standard Ubuntu distro.
Hi,
Bio-Linux is a remastered version of the standard 64-bit Ubuntu 10.04
LTS Desktop CD,
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: coreutils
During the past two weeks, dpkg has hung during unattended upgrades
under the 2.6.32-25-server kernel on two systems that have not
previously reported any errors. The dpkg process goes catatonic, and
the kernel hung process detector shows dpkg
--
dpkg hangs during sync under 2.6.32-25-server kernel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
After a long delay, the manual sync eventually returns to the command
prompt and dpkg can be used again.
--
dpkg hangs during sync under 2.6.32-25-server kernel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
The sync command then works as expected, and returns to the command
prompt after a few seconds.
--
dpkg hangs during sync under 2.6.32-25-server kernel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
On 15/11/10 19:21, C de-Avillez wrote:
Thank you for opening this bug and helping make Ubuntu better.
I am confused: you report an issue with dpkg, assign the package as
coreutils, and show a kernel OOPS. I am pretty sure coreutils has
nothing to do with it...
** Changed in: coreutils
On 15/11/10 20:35, C de-Avillez wrote:
Hi Tony,
Yes, it does help :-)
Now, dpkg is a binary -- meaning the 'sync' used inside dpkg is not
equivalent to the coreutils' 'sync' utility. It may even be that both
dpkg and sync are using a fsync() call (or equivalent) -- but this does
not make
On 10/10/10 16:55, Bruno Girin wrote:
[...]
It's very easy:
* Go to www.hsbc.co.uk (so now you know what bank I'm talking
about)
* Click the Log on button in the Business box on the right
At that point, it should take you to a login page but in my case it just
takes
Thanks for your mountall patch David, I've been struggling with this
for the past two weeks!
I've now got a working 64-bit Ubuntu 10.04 LTS NFSROOT from a debootrap
with your help!
Tony.
--
mountall issues with NFS root filesystem
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/537133
You received this bug
On 04/08/10 11:29, Rowan Berkeley wrote:
I wonder what caused the file directory to disintegrate in the first
place? As I said, when I looked at the loading dialog, it said dev/
(some long hex number) does not exist.
Hello, Rowan.
The hex number is the UUID of the filesystem, which is used to
On 16/07/10 21:18, Rob Beard wrote:
[...]
Is the Extents where it allocates space for big files? (I found
something about this when googling about EXT4).
I wonder too if it's possible to go back to EXT3 from EXT4 like it is
possible to go back from EXT3 to EXT2 (how I understand it, EXT3 is
On 16/07/10 20:53, Rob Beard wrote:
[...]
Now at the moment I've got my drive formatted to EXT3, I gather I can
convert from EXT3 to EXT4 (but I'm going to reformat the drive anyway)
but I wondered basically if I might be better going for EXT4 this time?
Hello, Rob.
Yes, you can convert from
On 19/05/10 23:22, Tony Pursell wrote:
[...]
Can anyone think of why I cant boot Lucid? I would be grateful of any
suggestions.
Hello, Tony.
Have you tried acpi=off on the kernel command line?
Bye,
Tony.
--
Dr. A.J.Travis, University of Aberdeen, Rowett Institute of Nutrition
and
On 19/05/10 13:36, Alan Pope wrote:
On 19 May 2010 13:21, Pallottini Aymericpaillom...@yahoo.com wrote:
Your solution seems a lot better than what I am doing as you have a full
install that you can update easily. I was just worried about the ability to
boot on different systems but you
On 27/04/10 12:34, Paul Sutton wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Ibbotson wrote:
[...]
I'm running 64-bit Lucid with 4GB of RAM, however Lucid is only seeing
3.1GB. It may be I have to set something in BIOS I haven't had time to
look into it fully yet, but be aware
On 26/04/10 15:08, Markie wrote:
[...]
Im going to be doing exactly the same thing, I wasnt sure about 64 bit
since I only have 2GB but it seems to make better sense
Hello, Markie.
I'm running the 10.04-rc-desktop-amd64 in 2GiB on my Asus A6K laptop:
I've just upgraded to the rc today: I've
On 26/04/10 17:54, Markie wrote:
[...]
Are you using TB3.x ? Its much better than the previous releases imo. Im
running 3.04. Are you saying the lightning extension does not work on
64-bit?
Hello, Mark.
Yes, I'm using TB 3.0.4 - The 64-bit version in the repo's seems to be
for icedove + I
On 12/04/10 13:14, Alan Lord (News) wrote:
On 12/04/10 13:10, pa...@fossbox.org.uk wrote:
Yes, I know - I shouldn't rant either cos I'm an NGO and not supposed to
be political ;)
I'm not sure what the rules are for this mailing list but it seems to
me this thread has left the discussion of
Dianne Reuby wrote:
Is this real?
http://www.commodoreusa.net/index.html
A revamped C64 running Win7 or Ubuntu.
Hello, Dianne.
Seems like it's just a badge-engineered version of one of these:
http://www.cybernetman.com/en/products/zero-footprint-pc/zpc-gx31.cfm
Bye,
Tony.
--
Dr.
Rik Boland wrote:
Hi
I am wanting to create a real simple network between 2 unbuntu machine
where sould, I start?
Hello, Rik.
Have a look at:
http://wiki.ubuntu.com/EasyUbuntuClustering
Bye,
Tony.
--
Dr. A.J.Travis, University of Aberdeen, Rowett Institute of Nutrition
and
Rob Beard wrote:
Tony Travis wrote:
Rob Beard wrote:
[...]
I've been mulling over getting a netbook but keep holding out to see
what the ARM offerings will be like. I've not been too impressed with
the MIPS based netbooks, but I've got high hopes for these netbooks.
Hello, Rob
Rob Beard wrote:
[...]
I've been mulling over getting a netbook but keep holding out to see
what the ARM offerings will be like. I've not been too impressed with
the MIPS based netbooks, but I've got high hopes for these netbooks.
Hello, Rob.
Have you tried a MIPS-based netbook, or are
Paul Sutton wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David King wrote:
When trying to copy video files to a USB flash drive, once the file has
copied over, the original gets smaller, down to either 96 bytes or 0
bytes. The copy also sometimes shrinks to the same size.
What
Steve wrote:
[...]
Not had any serious problems with Thunderbird 3 once it finally got my
IMAP folders synchronized. The only problem has been waiting for some of
the addons to become compatible. I know there are ways round this but it
hasn’t been to bad.
Hello, Steve.
I tried the PPA TB3,
Steve wrote:
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:32:33 -, Tony Travis a.tra...@abdn.ac.uk
wrote:
Steve wrote:
[...]
Not had any serious problems with Thunderbird 3 once it finally got my
IMAP folders synchronized. The only problem has been waiting for some of
the addons to become compatible. I
Kris Douglas wrote:
[...]
The PS3 is perfectly powerful enouugh for playing HD videos, but they
DELIBERATELY crippled linux in order for only PlayStation games to
work. As far as I know, you have full access to the CPU, but graphics
and BR are a no-go. Format a hard drive with Fat 32, i think
Rob Beard wrote:
[...]
Is anyone on here running Ubuntu on the PS3?
Hello, Rob.
I was quite keen to run Ubuntu on a PS3 too until I found out about the
*severe* memory constraints of this computer: The main CPU can only
access 256MiB of the *maximum* 512MiB RAM that can be installed, but the
Steve wrote:
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:51:29 -, Tim Dobson li...@tdobson.net wrote:
Hey there,
I wonder if anyone can help as this isn't exactly something I have a lot
of experience doing and I can either start off in the direction I think
looks best and possibly regret it later or I can
alan c wrote:
[...]
on a more serious note, *I* looked at a stallman video recently, and
learned a number of useful things...
(14 videos each 10 minutes)
Richard Stallman On FOSS GNU And Freedom 1 of 14 (to 14 of 14)
Rob Beard wrote:
[...]
The only time I would install a complete desktop on a server is if it is
to run as an LTSP server. Then it can need everything a desktop
requires. When I last installed an LTSP server I was also pleased to
see that FreeNX works with it as well. :-)
Hello, Rob.
I
1 - 100 of 240 matches
Mail list logo
