Modify /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/udev (shipped by udev, source:
system) to not copy the udev rules generated by chzdev. So changing:
Where are the initramfs-tools gone? Added them again ...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
--- Comment From ar...@de.ibm.com 2024-07-11 12:51 EDT---
> [...]
> A test build of the new valgrind version is now available here:
> https://launchpad.net/~fheimes/+archive/ubuntu/lp1982335
The build contains the requested support, and I didn't notice any
issues. Looks good to me.
--
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-207402 severity-medium
targetmilestone-inin---
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071774
Title:
zfs-dkms FTBFS on Linux 6.10/s390x
To
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-207400 severity-medium
targetmilestone-inin---
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064538
Title:
Revert back frame pointers for s390x
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2024-07-10 06:48 EDT---
The bug was introduced with kernel 5.14
The available patch (see upstream-ID in comment above) has been added to
stable for 5.15. which should help to get picked up by Jammy and later
releases.
--
You received this bug
Public bug reported:
Description: KVM: s390: unhandled guest LPSWEY instruction
Symptom: guest kernel oops on LPSWEY instruction
Problem: in rare cases like machine check injection with
PSW disabled, all load PSW instructions are
intercepted. LPSW and
--- Comment From kowshik.j...@in.ibm.com 2024-07-09 02:18 EDT---
I have verified the patch. It is working as expected. Please get the patch
included in the upcoming build.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--- Comment From hbath...@in.ibm.com 2024-07-08 04:19 EDT---
Fix accepted upstream (powerpc/next):
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/353d7a84c214f
("powerpc/64s/radix/kfence: map __kfence_pool at page granularity")
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
--- Comment From vanessa.ba...@ibm.com 2024-07-03 13:42 EDT---
Thank you! Will test and update results here :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068577
Title:
[UBUNTU 24.04]
--- Comment From niklas.schne...@ibm.com 2024-07-03 06:53 EDT---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Looks like it's not sufficient to have IOMMU_DEFAULT_DMA_LAZY=y only
> in addition IOMMU_DEFAULT_DMA_STRICT=n seems to be needed on top (otherwise
> the build failed for me).
> (Which I think is
--- Comment From niklas.schne...@ibm.com 2024-07-03 05:24 EDT---
Interesting with "make defconfig" on upstream I get
?
# CONFIG_IOMMU_DEFAULT_DMA_STRICT is not set
CONFIG_IOMMU_DEFAULT_DMA_LAZY=y
?
And that works well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2024-07-02 09:03 EDT---
Thanks everyone for your work!
With having the solution available as PPA, we can close this bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--- Comment From wint...@de.ibm.com 2024-07-02 03:42 EDT---
Closing this. Comment #9 desribes how customer fixed a network issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060939
Title:
--- Comment From vanessa.ba...@ibm.com 2024-07-01 18:35 EDT---
(In reply to comment #26)
> Problem could be fixed by upgrading Ubuntu 24.04 to the latest level (incl.
> kernel) via update, full-upgrade and reboot.
Good day! Back in Comment 6 , we mentioned there was another server
seeing
--- Comment on attachment From tasmiya.nalat...@ibm.com 2024-07-01 06:29
EDT---
Team,
I have updated the kernel using below commands as mentioned in
comment-21 and executed sosreport. Issue was reproducible with the
updated kernel as well.
--- Steps Followed ---
sudo apt --yes update
--- Comment From niklas.schne...@ibm.com 2024-07-01 04:49 EDT---
For reference the the CONFIG_DMA_DEFAULT_DMA setting is relevant to s390 only
since upstream commit c76c067e488c ("s390/pci: Use dma-iommu layer").
This commit also includes the following hunk to default to
Public bug reported:
Symptom:
Comparing Ubuntu 24.04 (kernelversion: 6.8.0-31-generic) against Ubuntu 22.04,
all of our PCI-related network measurements on LPAR show massive throughput
degradations (up to -72%). This shows for almost all workloads and numbers of
connections, detereorating with
--- Comment From sthou...@in.ibm.com 2024-06-27 01:08 EDT---
Thanks,
Also, see this reference.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-
nfs/20240624230734.17084-2-ne...@suse.de/T/#u
I will let tester to test with latest and update here.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
--- Comment From gautam.mengh...@ibm.com 2024-06-25 06:25 EDT---
Thanks for the response.
The patches are there in linux-next already.
1.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=55dfb8bed6fe8bda390cc71cca878d11a9407099
2.
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2404
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070358
Title:
[Ubuntu 24.04] FW1060.00 (NH1060_026) sosreport is
Public bug reported:
== Comment: #0 - Tasmiya Nalatwad - 2024-05-28
04:35:50 ==
--- Description ---
When sosreport command is executed the kernel OOPS crash is happening and lpar
is rebooting. As kdump was enabled the dump is captured.
Note : The bug looks similar Bug 206504 Which is seen on
--- Comment From sthou...@in.ibm.com 2024-06-25 05:18 EDT---
please integrate this commit into ubuntu 24.04
Fix is applied to nfsd-next kernel. Likely to hit mainline kernel in next rc.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/znbgbmiqy52id...@tissot.1015granger.net/
** Changed in: ubuntu
Public bug reported:
== Comment: #0 - SEETEENA THOUFEEK - 2024-06-25 01:24:11
==
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #205277 +++
---Problem Description---
KOP L2 guest fails to boot with 1 core - SMT8 topology
---Additional Hardware Info---
na
---Debugger Data---
na
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2024-06-24 12:21 EDT---
Thanks everyone for your work.
Closing the bug: changing status to "CLOSED"
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2404
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068577
Title:
[UBUNTU 24.04] Running sosreport causes the system to
--- Comment From vanessa.ba...@ibm.com 2024-06-24 11:21 EDT---
(In reply to comment #24)
> Yes, sure the NFS issue is reported here:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060217
Thank you!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Public bug reported:
KVM on PowerVM: L2 Guest-Aggressively entering CEDE results in low
performance. Possible tuning opportunity.
---uname output---
Linux rhel86edb1 #1 SMP Sun Jan 21 11:45:44 EST 2024 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le
GNU/Linux
---Steps to Reproduce---
Example: run READ only Test
--- Comment From vanessa.ba...@ibm.com 2024-06-20 10:24 EDT---
(In reply to comment #21)
> Please feel free to open any new ticket in case this (or anything else)
> happens to your system(s) in future.
Thank you, I appreciate your support and clear responses. If I ever hit this
again,
--- Comment From vanessa.ba...@ibm.com 2024-06-19 16:28 EDT---
Hello! Thank you very much for your replies!
(In reply to comment #16)
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for the report!
>
> Do you mind testing and verify if you run into the same issue with the
> latest Ubuntu kernel?
> It should be
--- Comment From hbath...@in.ibm.com 2024-06-19 06:54 EDT---
Posted v2 upstream:
https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20240619104919.20772-1-hbath...@linux.ibm.com/
("[PATCH v2] radix/kfence: map __kfence_pool at page granularity")
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
--- Comment From sthou...@in.ibm.com 2024-06-18 02:54 EDT---
distro, any update on this bug?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067383
Title:
[Ubuntu 24.04] hotplug of 68 or
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2410
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069035
Title:
[24.10] Please test secure-boot and lockdown on the
Public bug reported:
---Problem Description---
IBM Z Platform (s390x)
On the latest Ubuntu 24.04 LTS stream ( providing the 6.8.0-31-generic
kernel ) we were unable to find or install the 'crypto-policies' package
using the apt commands.
According to the online man page the tool is available
--- Comment From grgo.mari...@ibm.com 2024-06-12 04:31 EDT---
We installed from ppa:canonical-kernel-team/unstable:
# cat /etc/os-release
PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu Oracular Oriole (development branch)"
NAME="Ubuntu"
VERSION_ID="24.10"
VERSION="24.10 (Oracular Oriole)"
VERSION_CODENAME=oracular
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-206857 severity-high
targetmilestone-inin---
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069035
Title:
[24.10] Please test secure-boot and lockdown
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2404
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045250
Title:
pam_lastlog doesn't handle localtime_r related errors
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2024-06-07 06:53 EDT---
The fix to this bug has been released to -security.
Thanks to everyone for your speedy work to get this fixed.
With this, I am closing this bug: changing the status to ==> CLOSED
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin2404
**
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2404
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065579
Title:
[UBUNTU 22.04] OS guest boot issues on 9p filesystem
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "failed_sosreport_output_ilabg14_20240515"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068577/+attachment/5786684/+files/failed_sosreport_output_ilabg14_20240515
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) => Skipper Bug Screeners
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "DBGINFO-2024-05-16-10-09-29-ilabg14-2A1A18.tgz"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068577/+attachment/5786683/+files/DBGINFO-2024-05-16-10-09-29-ilabg14-2A1A18.tgz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "extracted kernel messages from automatically collected
kdump"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068577/+attachment/5786682/+files/dmesg.202405151159
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Public bug reported:
== Reported by ==
---Problem Description---
Good day, we recently installed Ubuntu 24.04 on a z LPAR.
After we run any test we usually collect the debug information in case we need
it, and what happened is that each time "sosreport" is run on the server
the system crashes
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "failed_sosreport_output_20240515"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068577/+attachment/5786681/+files/failed_sosreport_output_20240515.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
--- Comment From d.herrendoer...@de.ibm.com 2024-06-04 07:23 EDT---
@sergiodj
My patch went further and also allowed FIFOs.
This patch also passed all my verification with the workload that was
previously failing.
iff --git a/hw/9pfs/9p-util.h b/hw/9pfs/9p-util.h
index
--- Comment From d.herrendoer...@de.ibm.com 2024-06-03 04:09 EDT---
(In reply to comment #13)
> FWIW, I built QEMU with a proposed fix here:
>
> https://launchpad.net/~sergiodj/+archive/ubuntu/qemu-9pfs-fix
>
> It passes the testcase provided in the bug description. I'd still like to
>
Public bug reported:
== Comment: #0 - Kowshik Jois B S - 2024-05-21
01:41:34 ==
I have created a guest with maxcpus as 128 and given current value as 4. When I
try to hotplug 68 or more cpus, the guest is entering the shut off state.
This behavior was observed initially on the guest with 2G
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "Guest xml"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067383/+attachment/5783567/+files/hotplug.xml
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu on IBM Power Systems Bug Triage
(ubuntu-power-triage)
** Package changed: ubuntu => qemu
--- Comment From vineeth.vija...@ibm.com 2024-05-28 05:00 EDT---
(In reply to comment #28)
> Okay, thanks Vineeth for jumping in!
>
> In other words this will become unblocked once we have s390-tools >= 2.33.0
> in, which I am currently working on (v2.33.1 - based on LP#2067355).
Yes.
--- Comment From vineeth.vija...@ibm.com 2024-05-28 04:26 EDT---
(In reply to comment #26)
> Hi Peter,
> is this now incl. in s390-tools v2.33.0
> https://github.com/ibm-s390-linux/s390-tools/releases/tag/v2.33.0
> and what I read as:
> "chzdev: Add --is-owner to identify files created by
--- Comment From fre...@de.ibm.com 2024-05-27 09:08 EDT---
Installed a ubunutu 24.04 and enabled noble-proposed
In the end I used kernel:
uname -a
Linux a35lp66.lnxne.boe 6.8.0-31-generic #31-Ubuntu SMP Sat Apr 20 00:14:26 UTC
2024 s390x s390x s390x GNU/Linux
As testing this is
--- Comment From d.herrendoer...@de.ibm.com 2024-05-24 04:00 EDT---
There's absolutely no movement upstream-
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065579
Title:
[UBUNTU 22.04] OS
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin2404
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2410
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064321
Title:
Power guest secure boot with key management: kernel
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin2404
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2410
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064319
Title:
Power guest secure boot with key management: GRUB2
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin2404
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2410
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064345
Title:
Power guest secure boot with key management: userspace
--- Comment From steffen.ei...@ibm.com 2024-05-17 09:34 EDT---
Verified that the issue is resolved for all the following Ubuntu version with
the respective proposed repository.
mantic/23.10 : s390-tools (2.29.0-0ubuntu2.2)
jammy/22.04 : s390-tools (2.20.0-0ubuntu3.3)
focal/20.04 :
--- Comment From s...@de.ibm.com 2024-05-16 09:03 EDT---
On my Ubuntu 24.04 machine, I'm now using
$ uname -a
Linux a3545029.lnxne.boe 6.8.0-31-generic #31-Ubuntu SMP Sat Apr 20 00:14:26
UTC 2024 s390x s390x s390x GNU/Linux
and indeed compat layer is turned off:
$ file ./hello-s390.old
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2024-05-14 07:46 EDT---
@Canonical / Frank:
In the bug description it was stated that the problem has been observed in all
Ubuntu releases: focal to noble.
According to comment #13, the fix has been released
"Included in pam | 1.5.3-5ubuntu3."
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2009495
Title:
[Ubuntu 22.04] smc_run does not work, libsmc-preload.so cannot be
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2404
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2038583
Title:
Turning COMPAT_32BIT_TIME off on s390x
To manage
--- Comment From d.herrendoer...@de.ibm.com 2024-05-13 06:57 EDT---
This Bug is the result of the fix to:
CVE-2023-2861: Prohibit opening any special file directly on host
I also opened a Bug in the qemu bugtracker
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2337
The containers fail
Public bug reported:
=== Reported by - 2024-05-13 03:53:01 ===
---Problem Description---
OS guest boot issues on 9p filesystem due to unix domain sockets open failure
Contact Information = d.herrendoer...@de.ibm.com
Machine Type = 3931-7G4
---uname output---
5.15.0-92-generic
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2024-05-13 06:24 EDT---
This bug is also described at:
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2337
created in the qemu project bugtracker.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) => Skipper Bug Screeners (skipper-screen-team)
**
--- Comment From wint...@de.ibm.com 2024-05-13 05:20 EDT---
Hi Phoenyx,
I'm glad to hear that you were able to fix your issue.
I have to admit I don't get the full picture of your analysis:
The firewall gateways you mention, where are they? Inside KVM guests attached
to your OSA card?
--- Comment From wint...@de.ibm.com 2024-05-13 05:09 EDT---
More information from phoenyx:
"Hi Sandy,
We?ve managed to find what was causing the behaviour of packets being
received on the source interface to occur; however, we do still have a
concern that the behaviour was only present on
--- Comment From jan...@us.ibm.com 2024-05-09 17:13 EDT---
Was able to successfully validate the bootstrapped dotnet8 package .
Here are a few of the tests that were run:
$ uname -a
Linux ltcden12-lp22 6.8.0-31-generic #31-Ubuntu SMP Sat Apr 20 00:05:55 UTC
2024 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le
--- Comment From jan...@us.ibm.com 2024-05-07 13:41 EDT---
Thanks for the quick turnaround. We will test it and report the results.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064530
** Tags added: architecture-ppc64le bugnameltc-206197 severity-medium
targetmilestone-inin---
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061913
Title:
PMDK FTBFS on ppc64el
--- Comment From kowshik.j...@in.ibm.com 2024-05-06 14:39 EDT---
Frank has confirmed in his previous comment that the fix will be part kernel
6.8.0-31.31.
I also verified the bug on the same level of kernel and updated my
comments above that the fix is working as expected.
Since it is a
--- Comment From kowshik.j...@in.ibm.com 2024-05-06 06:50 EDT---
I have verified this bug on the latest available Ubuntu 24.04 host. The issue
has been fixed and is not getting reproduced anymore!
kernel: 6.8.0-31-generic #31-Ubuntu
Before guest creation:
HugePages_Total: 0
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2404
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052696
Title:
[UBUNTU 24.04] Haskell LLVM Backend: Objects of data
Public bug reported:
== Comment: #0 - JAMIE L. DOLAN - 2024-05-01
12:19:47 ==
This is a bug to track adding the feature of .NET 8 to Ubuntu 24.04
- This has already been added for s390x
- Customer survey showed strong interest in .NET on Linux on Power, having .NET
on Ubuntu on Power will
Public bug reported:
Covering the userspace portion (secvarctl)
Feature:
This feature comprises PowerVM LPAR guest OS kernel verification to
extend the chain of trust from partition firmware to the OS kernel and
includes key management. GRUB and the host OS kernel are signed with 2
separate
Public bug reported:
Covering the kernel portion
Feature:
This feature comprises PowerVM LPAR guest OS kernel verification using
static keys to extend the chain of trust from partition firmware to the
OS kernel. GRUB and the host OS kernel are signed with 2 separate
public key pairs.
Public bug reported:
Covering the GRUB2 portion:
Feature:
This feature comprises PowerVM LPAR guest OS kernel verification using
static keys to extend the chain of trust from partition firmware to the
OS kernel. GRUB and the host OS kernel are signed with 2 separate
public key pairs.
--- Comment From wint...@de.ibm.com 2024-04-29 05:15 EDT---
I got the reply from Phoenyx:
Hi Sandy,
We?ve made the suggested changes to arp_ignore and arp_announce, but
this does not seem to have had any effect on the issue unfortunately ?
There has been no reduction in the number of
--- Comment From hbath...@in.ibm.com 2024-04-24 12:23 EDT---
Posted the patches to reduce memory consumption for KFENCE upstream:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240424110926.184077-1-hbath...@linux.ibm.com/
("[PATCH 1/2] radix/kfence: map __kfence_pool at page granularity")
--- Comment From david_pa...@uk.ibm.com 2024-04-24 02:47 EDT---
Hi,
We have had a reply from the AIX support team (see below) explaining the RENEW
requests. Do you have any further questions for the AIX support team or can we
supply any further diagnostic information to progress this
--- Comment From jldo...@us.ibm.com 2024-04-19 13:51 EDT---
It was decided internally that the Novalink team will be taking a patched socat
.deb and placing it within their own repo to provide the correct behavior in
their customer environments.
Thank you to everyone that spent time on
Public bug reported:
---Problem Description---
Hugepages memory is not getting released even after destroying the guest
Machine Type = P10 Denali LPAR
---uname output---
Linux ubuntu2404lp3 6.8.0-22-generic #22-Ubuntu SMP Thu Apr 4 22:47:57 UTC
2024 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux
--- Comment From kowshik.j...@in.ibm.com 2024-04-18 11:45 EDT---
I have verified this bug on latest Ubuntu24.04 Host and the issue is not
getting reproduced anymore!
root@ubuntu2404lp2:~# qemu-system-ppc64 -accel tcg -smp 10,maxcpus=9000
qemu-system-ppc64: Invalid SMP CPUs 9000. The max
--- Comment From david_pa...@uk.ibm.com 2024-04-18 11:00 EDT---
Hi,
Thanks for looking at the logs. I agree that both syslogs (AIX 7.2 and 7.3)
contain multiple "TCP recvfrom got EAGAIN" entries.
To clarify the information in the attachments, I have updated the
comment for the
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-206054 severity-high
targetmilestone-inin---
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062118
Title:
autopkgtests fail on s390x (segfault)
To
--- Comment From david_pa...@uk.ibm.com 2024-04-17 13:11 EDT---
Here are the details of the IP addresses for the tcpdump files
AIX 7.3
9.20.120.112name = amaliada.v6.hursley.ibm.com -- Primary
9.20.120.153 name = adamsongrunter.v6.hursley.ibm.com ? Partner
AIX 7.2
--- Comment (attachment only) From david_pa...@uk.ibm.com 2024-04-17 06:19
EDT---
** Attachment added: "tcpdump for aix 7.2 testing part 4 of 4"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2042363/+attachment/5766767/+files/tcpdump17_04_2024_09H_10M3.zip
--
You received this bug notification
--- Comment (attachment only) From david_pa...@uk.ibm.com 2024-04-17 06:18
EDT---
** Attachment added: "tcpdump for aix 7.2 testing part 3 of 4"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2042363/+attachment/5766766/+files/tcpdump17_04_2024_09H_10M2.zip
--
You received this bug notification
--- Comment (attachment only) From david_pa...@uk.ibm.com 2024-04-17 06:16
EDT---
** Attachment added: "tcpdump for aix 7.3 testing part 5 of 5"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2042363/+attachment/5766763/+files/tcpdump16_04_2024_14H_03M4.zip
--
You received this bug notification
--- Comment (attachment only) From david_pa...@uk.ibm.com 2024-04-17 06:18
EDT---
** Attachment added: "tcpdump for aix 7.2 testing part 2 of 4"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2042363/+attachment/5766765/+files/tcpdump17_04_2024_09H_10M1.zip
--
You received this bug notification
--- Comment (attachment only) From david_pa...@uk.ibm.com 2024-04-17 06:17
EDT---
** Attachment added: "tcpdump for aix 7.2 testing part 1 of 4"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2042363/+attachment/5766764/+files/tcpdump17_04_2024_09H_10M.zip
--
You received this bug notification
--- Comment (attachment only) From david_pa...@uk.ibm.com 2024-04-17 06:16
EDT---
** Attachment added: "tcpdump for aix 7.3 testing part 4 of 5"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2042363/+attachment/5766762/+files/tcpdump16_04_2024_14H_03M3.zip
--
You received this bug notification
--- Comment (attachment only) From david_pa...@uk.ibm.com 2024-04-17 06:15
EDT---
** Attachment added: "tcpdump for aix 7.3 testing part 3 of 5"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2042363/+attachment/5766761/+files/tcpdump16_04_2024_14H_03M2.zip
--
You received this bug notification
--- Comment (attachment only) From david_pa...@uk.ibm.com 2024-04-17 06:15
EDT---
** Attachment added: "tcpdump for aix 7.3 testing part 2 of 5"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2042363/+attachment/5766760/+files/tcpdump16_04_2024_14H_03M1.zip
--
You received this bug notification
--- Comment (attachment only) From david_pa...@uk.ibm.com 2024-04-17 06:14
EDT---
** Attachment added: "tcpdump for aix 7.3 testing part 1 of 5"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2042363/+attachment/5766759/+files/tcpdump16_04_2024_14H_03M.zip
--
You received this bug notification
--- Comment (attachment only) From david_pa...@uk.ibm.com 2024-04-17 06:12
EDT---
** Attachment added: "Syslog for AIX 7.2 primary and partner"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2042363/+attachment/5766758/+files/syslog_17042024_adia_primary_amberjack_partner_both_aix72.zip
--
You
--- Comment (attachment only) From david_pa...@uk.ibm.com 2024-04-17 06:11
EDT---
** Attachment added: "Syslog and tcpdump file covering a working AIX 7.2 and
non-working AIX 7.3 pair of machines using the same NFSv4 server"
--- Comment (attachment only) From david_pa...@uk.ibm.com 2024-04-17 06:10
EDT---
** Attachment added: "Syslog and tcpdump file covering a working AIX 7.2 and
non-working AIX 7.3 pair of machines using the same NFSv4 server"
--- Comment From david_pa...@uk.ibm.com 2024-04-17 05:37 EDT---
Hi,
I have run the same MQ HA test on a working(AIX 7.2) and non working(AIX 7.3)
pair of machines with the same Linux NVSv4 Ubuntu 20.04 (kernel updated to
5.4.0-176-generic). I used the same RPC debug trace options as
--- Comment From steffen.ei...@ibm.com 2024-04-17 04:28 EDT---
Thanks Frank and Marc.
Verified for focal with the focal-package in PPA at
http://ppa.launchpad.net/fheimes/lp2059303/ubuntu (2.12.0-0ubuntu3.8)
-> verified for all releases in service.
focal, jammy, mantic, and noble.
--- Comment From mhart...@de.ibm.com 2024-04-16 05:22 EDT---
Can you please pick this commit:
https://github.com/ibm-s390-linux/s390-tools/commit/f5744b95db93fa9d5cfd6fb206767ad2dcc3c804
?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2004
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056491
Title:
not able to install noble on PowerVM LPARs `Kernel
--- Comment From wint...@de.ibm.com 2024-04-15 02:52 EDT---
A reply I sent via email to Phoenix Cameron and others:
I had an look at the data attached to the bugzilla.
I don?t really understand the setup. Why do have 30 bridges on top of 30 VLAN
interfaces all connected to the same OSA
1 - 100 of 14292 matches
Mail list logo
