[Bug 254468] Re: momentary video garbage upon drawing new objects

2009-01-09 Thread okparanoid
The problem is not coming from NVidia. NVidia just workaround this specific patch coming from ubuntu... This is obviously not the solution of the problem. Others cards drivers haven't a workaround for this and should not be bloated just because of one distribution. Why not just removing this

[Bug 254468] Re: momentary video garbage upon drawing new objects

2009-01-04 Thread okparanoid
Why kde should workaround, against an unofficial old patch that its used only in the ubuntu kernel (if i well understand the creator itself, fedora, doesnt use the patch anymore) . Dont we know really what it does now ? Cheers ! -- momentary video garbage upon drawing new objects

[Bug 254468] Re: momentary video garbage upon drawing new objects

2009-01-03 Thread okparanoid
Feisty is more than two years ago... Perhaps perfomance problems have been resolved in xorg upstream and this unofficial patch doesn't is relevant anymore... This cause a really big issue for all the kde users. Thanks to take care of us. Cheers !! -- momentary video garbage upon drawing new

[Bug 199418] Re: imagemagick depends on x stuff

2008-09-17 Thread okparanoid
Brian : Here is the output i get when i want to install imagemagick on a ubuntu gutsy server aptitude install imagemagick Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait Construction de l'arbre des dépendances Lecture des informations d'état... Fait Reading extended state information Initializing package

[Bug 199418] Re: imagemagick depends on x stuff

2008-09-07 Thread okparanoid
Hello ! basically : libx11-6 who depends itself on x11-common libx11-data etc etc a lot of packages wo are not installed on a ubuntu-server by default. Cheers -- imagemagick depends on x stuff https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/199418 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 257681] [NEW] gtk apps ugly on kde, a perhaps simple solution

2008-08-13 Thread okparanoid
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: kubuntu-kde4-desktop Hi all ! Lot of people complains about the uglyness of the gtk apps in kubuntu desktop. I have just discovered (and was surprised) than by just selecting a theme (glossy for example) in the gnome control center, the result is very

[Bug 193538] Re: [wish] provide a qt backend for firefox in kubuntu

2008-08-10 Thread okparanoid
Alexander, surely not a firefox bug, but yes it is a firefox only directly related wish (and not any workaround theme issue)... By providing the qt backend for kde, it will more integrated in this desktop environment (file dialog, etc...) Cheers ! -- [wish] provide a qt backend for firefox

[Bug 193538] Re: [wish] provide a qt backend for firefox in kubuntu

2008-08-10 Thread okparanoid
Alexander, surely not a firefox bug, but yes it is a firefox only directly related wish (and not any workaround theme issue)... By provide the qt backend for kde, it will more integrated in this desktop environment (file dialog, etc...) Cheers ! -- [wish] provide a qt backend for firefox in

[Bug 254881] [NEW] [security = domain] 100% cpu after a reboot of the PDC

2008-08-05 Thread okparanoid
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba We have a NAS with a Ubuntu samba server (Hardy amd 64 bits) who authenticate the user by using the security domain mode. The PDC of the domain is a windows server 2003 and have to reboot one time a week. After each reboot of the PDC, little

[Bug 254881] [NEW] [security = domain] 100% cpu after a reboot of the PDC

2008-08-05 Thread okparanoid
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba We have a NAS with a Ubuntu samba server (Hardy amd 64 bits) who authenticate the user by using the security domain mode. The PDC of the domain is a windows server 2003 and have to reboot one time a week. After each reboot of the PDC, little

[Bug 193538] Re: [wish] provide a qt backend for firefox in kubuntu

2008-05-10 Thread okparanoid
** Summary changed: - firefox3 is ugly on kde : Please provide a qt backend for firefox in kubuntu + [wish] provide a qt backend for firefox in kubuntu -- [wish] provide a qt backend for firefox in kubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193538 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 193538] Re: [wish] provide a qt backend for firefox in kubuntu

2008-05-10 Thread okparanoid
** Description changed: Binary package hint: firefox In hardy firefox looks very ugly whit kde, specially with kde4. - Is there a way to solve the probleme ? + Is it possible to provide a qt backend for kde users ? -- [wish] provide a qt backend for firefox in kubuntu

[Bug 193538] Re: [wish] provide a qt backend for firefox in kubuntu

2008-05-10 Thread okparanoid
I rename the summary and the description of the bug for clarity. Please go on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/222122 witch is not really a duplicate to speak on (the ugly too so it's cool if we can improve it) workarounds based on themes to apply on gtk or firefox but not

[Bug 222122] Re: Theme looks horrible in Kubuntu Hardy

2008-05-10 Thread okparanoid
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 193538 [wish] provide a qt backend for firefox in kubuntu ** Description changed: Binary package hint: mozilla-firefox I'm using Kubuntu Hardy (just installed it). And while I applaud the Firefox devs for creating a Gnome theme, it looks

[Bug 193538] Re: [wish] provide a qt backend for firefox in kubuntu

2008-05-10 Thread okparanoid
** Description changed: Binary package hint: firefox In hardy firefox looks very ugly whit kde, specially with kde4. Is it possible to provide a qt backend for kde users ? + + Please go on + https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/222122 witch is + not really a

[Bug 215191] Re: [wish] Tag flashplugin-nonfree not correctly configured when adobe's download fail during install

2008-05-10 Thread okparanoid
** Summary changed: - Please tag flashplugin-nonfree not correctly configured when adobe's download fail during install + [wish] Tag flashplugin-nonfree not correctly configured when adobe's download fail during install -- [wish] Tag flashplugin-nonfree not correctly configured when adobe's

[Bug 228585] Re: Virtualbox OSE modules need updating

2008-05-09 Thread okparanoid
kernel 2.6.24-17 seems to me only available on proposed so for testing purpose you can perhaps remove your proposed entry in the /etc/apt/sources.list cheers -- Virtualbox OSE modules need updating https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228585 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 59695] Re: High frequency of load/unload cycles on some hard disks may shorten lifetime

2008-05-09 Thread okparanoid
hi ! That i don't not understand it's why you don't try to detect this problem automatically and let inform the user via notification that the firmware of the disk is defect and propose him to make a dirty workaround. it is just few lines of code to add to the notification system (checking that

[Bug 59695] Re: High frequency of load/unload cycles on some hard disks may shorten lifetime

2008-05-09 Thread okparanoid
Novell/SUSE Bugzilla #338230 is marked as a duplicate of this new one. See comments for look at the workaround they are working on. ** Changed in: suse Bugwatch: Novell/SUSE Bugzilla #338230 = Novell/SUSE Bugzilla #386555 Status: In Progress = Unknown -- High frequency of

[Bug 193538] Re: firefox3 is ugly on kde : Please provide a qt backend for firefox in kubuntu

2008-05-09 Thread okparanoid
hi ! Don't understand why you change the status of this package since he does *not* speak of the kde-gtk theme (he is only a bit less ugly workaround). The wish of the topic is to provide a qt backend for firefox not to make any hack on the kde-gtk theme (which are welcome too but it is not the

[Bug 228585] Re: Virtualbox OSE modules need updating

2008-05-09 Thread okparanoid
I can't found documentation of proposed repo in wiki documentation. In the french community one it is specified that is for testing purpose only and i don't think that is activated out of the box but perhaps i'm wrong. However it seems that 2.6.24-17 doesn't appear in proposed any more so i

[Bug 228585] Re: Virtualbox OSE modules need updating

2008-05-09 Thread okparanoid
nope, it was only a suggestion in the case of the package were reverted, don't understand why i'm not seen him... Best regards -- Virtualbox OSE modules need updating https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228585 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 215191] Re: Please tag flashplugin-nonfree not correctly configured when adobe's download fail during install

2008-05-07 Thread okparanoid
** Summary changed: - set flashplugin-nonfree not correctly configured when adobe's download fail + Please tag flashplugin-nonfree not correctly configured when adobe's download fail during install -- Please tag flashplugin-nonfree not correctly configured when adobe's download fail during

[Bug 193538] Re: firefox3 is ugly on kde

2008-05-07 Thread okparanoid
here are some good news : http://blog.vlad1.com/2008/05/06/well-isnt-that-qt/ Perhaps we can have this for intrepid ** Summary changed: - firefox3 is ugly on kde + firefox3 is ugly on kde : Please provide a qt backend for firefox in kubuntu ** Tags added: qt -- firefox3 is ugly on kde :

[Bug 193538] Re: firefox3 is ugly on kde

2008-04-24 Thread okparanoid
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- firefox3 is ugly on kde https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193538 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 200347] Re: Firefox logo shows bad in the taskbar of KDE4 using 8.04 Alpha 6

2008-04-24 Thread okparanoid
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 193538 firefox3 is ugly on kde ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Committed -- Firefox logo shows bad in the taskbar of KDE4 using 8.04 Alpha 6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200347 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 205804] Re: Firefox Icon on panel looks bad

2008-04-24 Thread okparanoid
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 200347 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200347 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 193538 firefox3 is ugly on kde ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 200347 Firefox logo shows bad in the taskbar of KDE4 using 8.04 Alpha 6 --

[Bug 215191] Re: set flashplugin-nonfree not correctly configured when adobe's download fail

2008-04-11 Thread okparanoid
It just says that there is no problem except during the configuration of the package, in this line which are partially in english : Paramétrage de flashplugin-nonfree (9.0.124.0ubuntu1) ... Downloading... --00:44:23--

[Bug 215191] Re: set flashplugin-nonfree not correctly configured when adobe's download fail

2008-04-11 Thread okparanoid
Hello John i'm very sorry for my poor english. i'm confused about the time you lose because of this. the problem (and it's a minor one) is not about the flash plugin himself. it's work well on my hardy I talk about the .deb package and the process of the configuration/installation. During the

[Bug 215191] Re: set flashplugin-nonfree not correctly configured when adobe's download fail

2008-04-11 Thread okparanoid
Hello John i'm very sorry for my poor english. i'm confused about the time you lose because of this. the problem (and it's a minor one) is not about the flash plugin himself. it's work well on my hardy I talk about the .deb package and the process of the configuration/installation. During the

[Bug 215191] [NEW] set flashplugin-nonfree not correctly configured when adobe's download fail

2008-04-10 Thread okparanoid
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: flashplugin-nonfree hello i have upgrade my flashplugin-non free package, and in same time of lot of other packages in hardy, so between the download of the package and the installation i have lost my network access because of the hal upgrade who

[Bug 215191] Re: set flashplugin-nonfree not correctly configured when adobe's download fail

2008-04-10 Thread okparanoid
hello :) here is the procedure : [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo aptitude install flashplugin-nonfree Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait Construction de l'arbre des dépendances Lecture des informations d'état... Fait Lecture de l'information d'état étendu Initialisation de l'état des paquets...

[Bug 205154] Re: [Hardy] netgear wg311t is not detected by networkmanager

2008-04-08 Thread okparanoid
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New = Invalid -- [Hardy] netgear wg311t is not detected by networkmanager https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205154 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 61380] Re: Netgear WG311T unrecognised after upgrade

2008-04-08 Thread okparanoid
Seems to work for me with hardy : 2.6.24-15-generic #1 SMP Tue Apr 8 00:33:51 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux -- Netgear WG311T unrecognised after upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/61380 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 205154] Re: [Hardy] netgear wg311t is not detected by networkmanager

2008-04-08 Thread okparanoid
seems to work now for me -- [Hardy] netgear wg311t is not detected by networkmanager https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205154 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 102105] Re: dash does not conform to LSB (-l option, /etc/profile.d)

2008-04-04 Thread okparanoid
It will very convenient to have the /etc/profile.d working like this. I need this to adjust properly proxy settings in different networks environments. Will this commited for hardy ? Thanks ! -- dash does not conform to LSB (-l option, /etc/profile.d) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102105

[Bug 102105] Re: dash does not conform to LSB (-l option, /etc/profile.d)

2008-04-04 Thread okparanoid
sorry for the inconvenience, it is already done. :op -- dash does not conform to LSB (-l option, /etc/profile.d) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102105 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 199418] Re: imagemagick depends on x stuff

2008-03-30 Thread okparanoid
If i look here : http://www.imagemagick.org/script/advanced-unix-installation.php It seem possible to compile imagemagick with --without-x option : don't use the X Window System. By default, ImageMagick uses the X11 delegate libraries if they are available. When --without-x is

[Bug 193538] Re: firefox3 is ugly on kde

2008-03-30 Thread okparanoid
Note that the request is not to have better support of gtk in kde4 (which is an other problem and could help as workaround) but to have a specific firefox-qt package who use qt for backend in firefox3 like it is already done with aqua on mac os gtk on gnome and windows api on windows... Perhaps

Re: [Bug 200347] Re: Firefox logo shows bad in the taskbar of KDE4 using 8.04 Alpha 6

2008-03-24 Thread okparanoid
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 193538 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193538 Caroline Ford wrote: *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 193538 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193538 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 193538 firefox3 is ugly on kde Hi

[Bug 205154] [NEW] [Hardy] netgear wg311t is not detected by networkmanager

2008-03-22 Thread okparanoid
Public bug reported: Seems that network manager doesn't detect my netgear wg311t card. As a result i can't select the desired wireless network to connect directly by the gui frontend (with both gnome one kde one). I think that is a network-manager bug because the atheros driver works well : I

[Bug 183800] Re: cannot lock KDE 4 desktop

2008-03-22 Thread okparanoid
By default kubuntu-kde4-desktop depends on kdm (not kdm-kde4). Will kdm-kde4 replace kdm (kde3) for hardy ? If not we have to found an other solution to resolve this problem for hardy... -- cannot lock KDE 4 desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/183800 You received this bug notification

[Bug 193538] Re: firefox3 is ugly on kde

2008-03-08 Thread okparanoid
Since Mozilla Corp has decided to create specific platforms backend's themes and use the platform api directly for the gui, the result is that firefox3 linux theme render is very ugly on kde, because firefox use the one they have made for gnome... And the render is catastrophic... Firefox 2 don't

[Bug 199418] [NEW] imagemagick depends on x stuff

2008-03-07 Thread okparanoid
Public bug reported: Hello i have installed mediawiki on my ubuntu hardy server and need imagemagick to have the convert program. However imagemagick depend on lot X11 stuff and i think that's not good for a server. We should have a way to have basics imagemagick tools who do non depends on x

[Bug 193538] [NEW] firefox3 is ugly on kde

2008-02-19 Thread okparanoid
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox In hardy firefox looks very ugly whit kde, specially with kde4. Is there a way to solve the probleme ? ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: firefox3 kde ugly ** Summary changed: - firefox3

[Bug 152284] Re: VirtualBox seamless mode hides kde task bar

2007-10-15 Thread okparanoid
Yes i confirm that with the official innoteck package (from virtualbox.org), the seamless mode don't hide the KDE taskbar. The Taskbar of the Virtualized Machine is just on the top of my Kunbuntu host Task bar. The situation is different with ose version : The VM Taskbar (in fact i have just try

[Bug 152284] VirtualBox seamless mode hide kde task bar

2007-10-13 Thread okparanoid
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: virtualbox-ose Like i said here : http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=568710 With the official innotek package for feisty the seamless mode put the taskbar of the virtualized machine (windows XP) above my kde taskbar. I have installed Gutsy and

[Bug 152284] Re: VirtualBox seamless mode hide kde task bar

2007-10-13 Thread okparanoid
I would say too that VirtualBox is THE killer feature to help users in my company (whose i am an admin) to switch to linux the less difficulty possible. For this an usage of VirtualBox the most friendly possible for end-users should be an priority and this why i think that's it can be considered

[Bug 152284] Re: VirtualBox seamless mode hide kde task bar

2007-10-13 Thread okparanoid
Perhaps other users don't agree with my mind for the fullscreen mode (a fullscreen mode should be in really fullscreen) and it's why i have report the bug for seamless mode : by minimum it's important to have seamless mode above the taskbar. Sorry for multiple comments... -- VirtualBox seamless

[Bug 152284] Re: VirtualBox seamless mode hide kde task bar

2007-10-13 Thread okparanoid
** Tags added: seamless virtualbox virtualbox-ose -- VirtualBox seamless mode hide kde task bar https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152284 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list