[Bug 586076] Re: plymouthd: ply-keyboard.c assertion failed

2010-07-13 Thread stiV
There is a similar fedora bug report. I too see this error (when adding --verbose), no idea where it's coming from. I did try to boot using a debian initramfs, it works there... https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604927 ** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #604927

[Bug 517060] Re: hardy-lucid upgrade using linux-image-xen breaks systems running in PV mode under xen/xenserver

2010-04-26 Thread stiV
yeah well ... nice automated message :) unfortunately it has nothing to do with the underlying problem problem. The problem is not an error in the kernel package, the error is that there is no kernel package. So I urge you to read the inital report ;) -- hardy-lucid upgrade using linux-image-xen

[Bug 401126] Re: Realtek RTL8192SE WLAN Card Fails to work on Medion Akoya E1312 Netbook

2010-03-10 Thread stiV
I also tried that a few days ago and was on the edge of reporting it here, but came to the same conclusion. Helped somehow for sometime, but not really. Still there is a workaround that is at least a little better than unload/loading the module (which interrupts all connections and needs a few

[Bug 311869] Re: Add driver for Sentelic Touch pad

2010-03-09 Thread stiV
i am using lucid alpha 4 (unr) on my netbook, which has this touchpad. The touchpad works (the basics), but there is no multitouch, any idea on how to control that in lucid (i have no such options in system-mouse)? Since hal has been removed, all the howtos out there don't work no more :-( --

[Bug 428747] Re: Add provider BOB in Austria

2010-03-08 Thread stiV
is there a reason why this is not in the current lucid alpha? -- Add provider BOB in Austria https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/428747 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 401126] Re: Realtek RTL8192SE WLAN Card Fails to work on Medion Akoya E1312 Netbook

2010-03-08 Thread stiV
I can confirm, that the driver is unusable when using the netbook on battery power. It works for about a minute, but then just stops. Would it be helpful to add output from syslog? -- Realtek RTL8192SE WLAN Card Fails to work on Medion Akoya E1312 Netbook https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401126

[Bug 401126] Re: Realtek RTL8192SE WLAN Card Fails to work on Medion Akoya E1312 Netbook

2010-03-04 Thread stiV
well guys - you rock. i got my new netbook today and decided to try lucid netbook remix (although it's sadly just 32bit). It worked like a charm, except the wireless card wasn't recognized, so i googled and after seeing so many people playing with ndiswrapper (i really thought this ancient way

[Bug 444829] Re: grub-probe crashed with SIGSEGV in __libc_start_main()

2010-02-16 Thread stiV
I am still having this problem - exactly as described here. Installed ubuntu using LVM and added another physical harddrive to the volumegroup. Everything worked, except for the latest kernel update: Setting up linux-image-2.6.31-20-generic (2.6.31-20.57) ... Running depmod. update-initramfs:

[Bug 444829] Re: grub-probe crashed with SIGSEGV in __libc_start_main()

2010-02-16 Thread stiV
ok ... i just solved my problem by manually adding the following line to /boot/grub/device.map (hd1) /dev/sdb so now the file has both hdds (hd0) /dev/sda (hd1) /dev/sdb and everything works like expected now -- grub-probe crashed with SIGSEGV in __libc_start_main()

[Bug 512459] Re: Winbind failed to connect to AD: Program lacks support for encryption type

2010-02-15 Thread stiV
according to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTSDebianImportFreeze packages will only be imported from Debian testing in this way on a case by case basis or by explicit request from a developer. will this be done? -- Winbind failed to connect to AD: Program lacks support for encryption type

[Bug 512459] Re: Winbind failed to connect to AD: Program lacks support for encryption type

2010-02-15 Thread stiV
according to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTSDebianImportFreeze packages will only be imported from Debian testing in this way on a case by case basis or by explicit request from a developer. will this be done? -- Winbind failed to connect to AD: Program lacks support for encryption type

[Bug 517060] [NEW] hardy-lucid upgrade using linux-image-xen breaks systems running in PV mode under xen/xenserver

2010-02-04 Thread stiV
Public bug reported: I don't really get the decision to create a linux-image-virtual without support to run the OS paravirtualized on a Xen host. This will drive people away from ubuntu as a server system. Virtualization is growing on importance and not supporting something like Xen (or XenServer

[Bug 238549] Re: xen dom0 crashes with BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s!

2010-01-22 Thread stiV
This bug persists - ubuntu 8.04.3 running on xenserver 5.5u1 interestingly the bug only happens on i386 machines (system completely up2date with full-upgrade), the amd64 machines don't crash - at least for several days now they didn't. -- xen dom0 crashes with BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck

[Bug 393792] Re: lighttpd reload executes restart (bad on logrotate!)

2009-07-02 Thread stiV
sorry - it tries that once a day (daily logrotate), i just changed my logrotating to be hourly because of logfile size restrictions. -- lighttpd reload executes restart (bad on logrotate!) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393792 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 393792] Re: lighttpd reload executes restart (bad on logrotate!)

2009-07-02 Thread stiV
Thanks for upping the priority ... I just tried it, and this also happens if lighty is not automatically started in a runlevel. It just starts (or at least tries to start) at 22 minutes after the full hour (logrotate) - this may even be an upstream bug, i guess it's the same in debian (don't have

[Bug 393792] [NEW] lighttpd reload executes restart (bad on logrotate!)

2009-06-30 Thread stiV
*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: The logrotate script of lighttpd does a lighttpd reload, which is what it should do, but if I stop the lighttpd daemon manually I certainly do NOT want it to be started again by the log rotation. reload should NOT start a

[Bug 393792] Re: lighttpd reload executes restart (bad on logrotate!)

2009-06-30 Thread stiV
This is related ... somehow ;) http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=504319 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #504319 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=504319 -- lighttpd reload executes restart (bad on logrotate!) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393792 You

[Bug 393792] Re: lighttpd reload executes restart (bad on logrotate!)

2009-06-30 Thread stiV
I think the right thing to do is changing the init script to actually perform a reload when reload is called. restart or force-reload stay the same, reload checks if lighttpd is running, and only performs the restart if it is reload) log_daemon_msg Reloading $DESC configuration $NAME

[Bug 393792] Re: lighttpd reload executes restart (bad on logrotate!)

2009-06-30 Thread stiV
I'm sorry, but starting potentially harmful software like a webserver with a buggy webpage without the administrator knowing it (who would expect that a service that got shutdown manually just appears again?) should really not be a low priority, especially since it's easy to fix... imho this is

[Bug 365109] Re: [needs-packaging] utrac Universal Text Recognizer and Converter

2009-04-22 Thread stiV
fedora has it :) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=4050 ** Also affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [needs-packaging] utrac Universal Text Recognizer and Converter https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365109 You received this bug notification

[Bug 250400] Re: make-ssl-cert fails if HOME is unset or empty

2008-10-21 Thread stiV
if the make-ssl-cert script does not get changed this needs to be checked on other packages too (so they use /dev/urandom and not the homedir) for the moment i think apache2 has a ssleay.cnf which uses the homedir -- make-ssl-cert fails if HOME is unset or empty

[Bug 250400] Re: package ssl-cert 1.0.14-0ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade:

2008-10-17 Thread stiV
It fails in an automatic upgrade/installation environment because the PATH variables are different than if you're using a shell. /usr/sbin is not included if a cron runs the upgrade (or installation) - therefor the command make-ssl-cert fails to create the files (because the file is not

[Bug 250400] Re: package ssl-cert 1.0.14-0ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade:

2008-10-17 Thread stiV
well ... i am sorry - it seems i have made an error here. I don't know exactly what i did wrong but i retested everything and fixing the path is not enough. the real problem is the ssleay.cnf that is being used to generate the standard pem file it sets the RANDFILE variable to $ENV::HOME/.rnd

[Bug 250400] Re: package ssl-cert 1.0.14-0ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade:

2008-10-17 Thread stiV
well you can try ... if used in an environment where there is no homedir set it does fail - no certificate is created or updated. ** Changed in: ssl-cert (Ubuntu Intrepid) Status: Won't Fix = New -- package ssl-cert 1.0.14-0ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade:

[Bug 250400] Re: package ssl-cert 1.0.14-0ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade:

2008-10-17 Thread stiV
this has an effect on all packages (eg. lighttpd) that use a ssleay.cnf and may create or update certificates upon installation/upgrade -- make-ssl-cert fails if HOME is unset or empty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250400 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 269014] [NEW] sha256 signatures in release files (feisty) for all gzipped files broken

2008-09-11 Thread stiV
*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: Binary package hint: apt This is new to feisty, there has been a similar (the same!?) bug in gutsy++ see #243630 it seems only to have an effect on the gzipped files ... at the moment, the official mirrors hold lines

[Bug 269014] Re: sha256 signatures in release files (feisty) for all gzipped files broken

2008-09-11 Thread stiV
The error is in every distribution (dapper to intrepid). all the .gz files have the same checksum in SHA256 -- sha256 signatures in release files (feisty) for all gzipped files broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269014 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 269014] Re: sha256 signatures in release files (feisty) for all gzipped files broken

2008-09-11 Thread stiV
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 243630 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/243630 ** Description changed: Binary package hint: apt - This is new to feisty, there has been a similar (the same!?) bug in - gutsy++ see #243630 + UPDATE: All SHA256 checksums for all .gz files in all

[Bug 269014] Re: sha256 checksums in release files for all gzipped files broken

2008-09-11 Thread stiV
** Summary changed: - sha256 signatures in release files (feisty) for all gzipped files broken + sha256 checksums in release files for all gzipped files broken -- sha256 checksums in release files for all gzipped files broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269014 You received this bug

[Bug 269014] Re: sha256 checksums in release files for all gzipped files broken

2008-09-11 Thread stiV
so the checksums won't be fixed in feisty gutsy? what do you mean by this is fixed in apt in intrepid? the checksums are wrong - what can apt do there? just questions of curiosity ;) -- sha256 checksums in release files for all gzipped files broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269014 You

[Bug 223766] [NEW] CVE-2008-1387 - ClamAV before 0.93 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a crafted ARJ archive, as demonstrated by the PROTOS GENOME test suite

2008-04-28 Thread stiV
*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: Binary package hint: clamav see CVE page for more info - this bug practically crashes clamd and renders eg. a mailserver useless. just by sending a bad email (happened to me today) could be a duplicate of

[Bug 217256] [NEW] ClamAV Upack Processing Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

2008-04-14 Thread stiV
*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: Binary package hint: clamav see http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2008-11/advisory/ there is no fix available, but should be soon. Secunia Research has discovered a vulnerability in ClamAV, which can be exploited by

[Bug 209627] [NEW] lighttpd (security) ssl fix

2008-03-31 Thread stiV
*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: Binary package hint: lighttpd as of yesterday the lighttpd could have gotten rid of a very nasty bug which causes SSL sessions to terminate and produce errors ... see http://trac.lighttpd.net/trac/ticket/285 for more

[Bug 209627] Re: lighttpd (security) ssl fix

2008-03-31 Thread stiV
see http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2008-1531 ** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2008-1531 -- lighttpd (security) ssl fix https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209627 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 199124] [NEW] amavisd-release uses wrong socket

2008-03-06 Thread stiV
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: amavisd-new I updated from amavisd-new 2.4.2 to 2.5.3 and encountered a small problem: the file /etc/amavis/conf.d/25-amavis_helpers has a change: $unix_socketname = /var/run/amavis/amavis.sock; has been changed to $unix_socketname =

[Bug 109294] Re: HTTPS sources fail to update

2008-02-13 Thread stiV
I have this probem w. ubuntu feisty on multiple machines, and although deleting lists from /var/lib/apt/lists and /var/lib/apt/lists/partial works, I'd love to have the working version of apt-transport-https in feisty too. I'm using my own mirror and changing to gutsy is not an option at the

[Bug 53049] Re: Fails to upgrade non-interactively

2007-07-12 Thread stiV
you're right Sam Morris, thing is update-inetd does not check the variable DEBCONF_FRONTEND, but checks DEBIAN_FRONTEND if it is set to noninteractive ... so this is no bug of samba directly (i encountered this one when installing postfix via onetime bootscript), but it is a problem w.