[Bug 989175] Re: Powernap should ensure WoL is enabled before Second Stage

2012-04-29 Thread vincefn
@Andres - thanks, it would be nice to be able too test the wake-on-ARP, so putting this in a PPA looks like a great idea. This being said, I just realized that my server does not have the Wake- On: a support that is required, so I won't be able to test this unless I change the card :-( -- You

[Bug 989175] Re: Powernap prevents waking from WakeOnLAN

2012-04-28 Thread vincefn
OK, I think I have found the reason for this bug. It is not due to stage 2 in power nap, but rather stage 1 - during powersave mode the ethernet configuration for the card is changed, which deactivates wake-on-lan. Since power nap first enters in stage1 then stage2, when the computer is turned

[Bug 989175] Re: Powernap should ensure WoL is enabled before Second Stage

2012-04-28 Thread vincefn
Thanks for the quick answer ! Indeed it is an issue between powernap and pm-utils. I had looked in /etc/pm but did not think to look in /usr/lib /pm-utils. I really think this disable_wol should be deactivated by default (how much power does that save ?) - many people will want to use auto

[Bug 989175] Re: Powernap prevents waking from WOL

2012-04-27 Thread vincefn
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected precise ** Description changed: I have a server running Ubuntu 12.04. The current issue is the following: * if I activate 2nd-stage powernap to poweroff (or 'shutdown -h' by using /etc/powernap/action), the computer will not wake

[Bug 989175] ProcEnviron.txt

2012-04-27 Thread vincefn
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcEnviron.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989175/+attachment/3107394/+files/ProcEnviron.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989175

[Bug 989175] modified.conffile..etc.powernap.action.txt

2012-04-27 Thread vincefn
apport information ** Attachment added: modified.conffile..etc.powernap.action.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989175/+attachment/3107395/+files/modified.conffile..etc.powernap.action.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 989175] modified.conffile..etc.powernap.config.txt

2012-04-27 Thread vincefn
apport information ** Attachment added: modified.conffile..etc.powernap.config.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989175/+attachment/3107396/+files/modified.conffile..etc.powernap.config.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 989175] Re: Powernap prevents waking from WOL

2012-04-27 Thread vincefn
Added the apport information. WOL=WakeOnLAN thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989175 Title: Powernap prevents waking from WOL To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 989175] [NEW] Powernap prevents waking from WOL

2012-04-26 Thread vincefn
Public bug reported: I have a server running Ubuntu 12.04. The current issue is the following: * if I activate 2nd-stage powernap to poweroff (or 'shutdown -h' by using /etc/powernap/action), the computer will not wake when sent a magic packet. * if however, I manually shutdown the computer

[Bug 989175] Re: Powernap prevents waking from WOL

2012-04-26 Thread vincefn
** Attachment added: /etc/powernap/config (with 2nd stage commented out) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989175/+attachment/3106397/+files/config -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 770878] Re: objcryst-fox version 1.9.0.2-1 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric

2011-07-08 Thread vincefn
Version 1.9.6.0-2 is now used in Oneiric, so this bug can be closed. ** Changed in: objcryst-fox (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: In Progress = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 770878] Re: objcryst-fox version 1.9.0.2-1 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric

2011-07-06 Thread vincefn
The package now in Debian has been fixed a few days ago, see: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=objcryst-fox http://packages.qa.debian.org/o/objcryst-fox.html I'm not sure how this propagates to the ubuntu package ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 770878] Re: objcryst-fox version 1.9.0.2-1 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric

2011-06-19 Thread vincefn
The bug has now been fixed in the upstream package (version 1.9.6.0-R1295), and Objcryst-Fox now compiles correctly with gcc 4.6, as tested with an up-to-date oneiric. The testing was made using the shared libraries (frreglu, newmat and wxGTK) provided with ubuntu. Up-to-date package:

[Bug 770878] Re: objcryst-fox version 1.9.0.2-1 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric

2011-06-18 Thread vincefn
** Changed in: objcryst-fox (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: New = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770878 Title: objcryst-fox version 1.9.0.2-1 failed to build on amd64

[Bug 770878] Re: objcryst-fox version 1.9.0.2-1 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric

2011-06-10 Thread vincefn
** Changed in: objcryst-fox (Ubuntu Oneiric) Assignee: (unassigned) = vincefn (vincent-favre-nicolin) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770878 Title: objcryst-fox version 1.9.0.2-1

[Bug 777420] Re: show() blocks in pylab mode with ipython 0.10.1

2011-06-06 Thread vincefn
Thanks for the quick upload ! This looks OK, I installed the new package using: wget http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/i/ipython/ipython_0.10.1-1ubuntu0.1_all.deb dpkg -i ipython_0.10.1-1ubuntu0.1_all.deb And with this new version, both ipython -pylab and ipython -wthread seem to

[Bug 777420] Re: show() blocks in pylab mode with ipython 0.10.1

2011-05-25 Thread vincefn
I also have this problem with ipython natty. Even if TkAgg works fine, not being able to use GTK(Agg) means that figures cannot be saved directly as jpg's - which is a problem when you want to save a lot (1's) of 2D plots without using too much disk space. Also, I can't seem to be able tu

[Bug 777420] Re: show() blocks in pylab mode with ipython 0.10.1

2011-05-25 Thread vincefn
Answering my own query: apparently installing ipython 0.10.2 (from oneiric) fixes the issue: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/70857487/ipython_0.10.2-1_all.deb Is there any chance this could be pushed as an update for natty (when installing, no dependency conflict appeared) ? -- You received this

[Bug 776078] Re: Can no longer use mlab

2011-05-25 Thread vincefn
A quick followup: about the 'threads' issue, this seems to be a bug related to ipython (see https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/777420 and https://github.com/ipython/ipython/issues/185). This is fixed by upgrading to ipython 0.10.2, which is available from ubuntu oneiric (no additional dependency

[Bug 777420] Re: show() blocks in pylab mode with ipython 0.10.1

2011-05-25 Thread vincefn
png is supported which is lossless and compresses very well unless your plotting photos. Unfortunately I am plotting images recorded from 2D detectors, so compression is not that good with png (yes I can post-convert to jpg but I'd rather avoid that sort of kludge). I have 0.10.2 in my ppa:

[Bug 777420] Re: show() blocks in pylab mode with ipython 0.10.1

2011-05-25 Thread vincefn
I really believe this qualifies for an SRU: * the thread-handling of ipython represents a large part of its added value compared to a standard python console * it affects matplotlib, although a workaround using a different backend is possible, it removes some functionality (described in this

[Bug 762025] Re: acroread package from canonical reports errors on amd64 systems

2011-05-15 Thread vincefn
Same issue under natty (11.04) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/762025 Title: acroread package from canonical reports errors on amd64 systems -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 776078] Re: Can no longer use mlab

2011-05-03 Thread vincefn
Hi, I have a freshly updated natty system. I can confirm the bug. I can also confirm that updating to python-enthoughtbase 3.0.6 fixes the issue when importing mlab, but then the event loop seems stuck (can't interact with the mlab window, using ipython -wthread or simply python). For those

[Bug 776078] Re: Can no longer use mlab

2011-05-03 Thread vincefn
What's your IPython version? Python 2.7.1+ (r271:86832, Apr 11 2011, 18:13:53) IPython 0.10.1 -- An enhanced Interactive Python. When you try with simply python, do you use'mlab.show()' to start the event loop? Ah, right - the mlab window popped open without using show(), so I did not try

[Bug 776078] Re: Can no longer use mlab

2011-05-03 Thread vincefn
That kinda sucks. Are you sure that you are using the Wx backend for Mayavi. Do you have the python-traitsbackendwx package installed? If something is not working with Wx, Mayavi now defaults to Qt. I had installed python-traitsbackendwx, python-traitsgui, and not python-traitsbackendqt. I also

[Bug 573557] Re: nvidia-current 195.36.15 + kernel 2.6.32 + dual cards crashes system

2010-05-19 Thread vincefn
@gied: The behavior looks a bit different so it's not the same bug - which is why you'll have to file another bug report, otherwise you won't get attention. It would be interesting to test if you can solve your issues by using kernel 2.6.31, as I did before (you can find it in

[Bug 573557] Re: nvidia-current 195.36.15 + kernel 2.6.32 + dual cards crashes system

2010-05-05 Thread vincefn
Thanks a lot for the quick fix ! I tested the -proposed packages (manually installed nvidia-current-dev, nvidia-current and nvidia-current-modaliases with version=195.36.15-0ubuntu3), and they work fine ! I tested this with my two nvidia cards, 9600GT+GTX295, without any problem, CUDA also works

[Bug 548362] Re: nvidia-current 195.36.15 + kernel 2.6.32 + dual cards crashes system

2010-05-02 Thread vincefn
seanlano wrote: I had a similar problem, but I only have one graphics card. On 32bit Lucid everything worked fine, but on 64bit Lucid all of the nvidia drivers cause the system to not load a graphical environment, but I can still use a tty to uninstall the driver and go back to nouveau. That

[Bug 548362] Re: nvidia-current 195.36.15 + kernel 2.6.32 + dual cards crashes system

2010-05-02 Thread vincefn
Alberto Milone wrote Please try to reproduce the problem and attach your /var/log/Xorg.0.log and /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old Sorry, this is impossible - somehow the crash occurs *before* Xorg writes anything in the log. I have attached the nvidia bug report. What I did was: 1) Start from

[Bug 573557] [NEW] nvidia-current 195.36.15 + kernel 2.6.32 + dual cards crashes system

2010-05-02 Thread vincefn
Public bug reported: This is a followup on a bug discussion started in bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics- drivers/+bug/548362 This bugs is related to a crash when loading X, for PC with at least two nVidia graphics cards and using the nvidia-current drivers

[Bug 573557] Re: nvidia-current 195.36.15 + kernel 2.6.32 + dual cards crashes system

2010-05-02 Thread vincefn
** Attachment added: nvidia195.36.15-bug-report.log.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47216462/nvidia195.36.15-bug-report.log.gz -- nvidia-current 195.36.15 + kernel 2.6.32 + dual cards crashes system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573557 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 548362] Re: nvidia-current 195.36.15 + kernel 2.6.32 + dual cards crashes system

2010-05-02 Thread vincefn
Alberto Milone wrote: If you didn't use the Nvidia installer (and installed the driver from Jockey) and you're experiencing a problem with 2 cards then you're facing a different issue and I'd be glad if you could open a separate bug report about it. OK, I just did that. New bug report

[Bug 573557] Re: nvidia-current 195.36.15 + kernel 2.6.32 + dual cards crashes system

2010-05-02 Thread vincefn
Alan wrote: This may be related to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/casper/+bug/519123; Apparently not - that other bug happens when booting the live CD, which I believe does not use the nvidia driver but rather nouveau. Moreover removing the second card does not help, contrary to this

[Bug 548362] Re: nvidia-current 195.36.15 + kernel 2.6.32 + dual cards crashes system

2010-05-01 Thread vincefn
petogal wrote: the same for me 32bit system video is GeForce Go7300 This bug happens with two nVidia cards - do you also have two ? -- nvidia-current 195.36.15 + kernel 2.6.32 + dual cards crashes system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548362 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 548362] Re: nvidia-current 195.36.15 + kernel 2.6.32 + dual cards crashes system

2010-04-30 Thread vincefn
Changed back to confirmed since this affects Ubuntu's 'nvidia-current' package. Thanks - indeed this bug is not about the installer but really about a hard crash which affects the nvidia-current package. -- nvidia-current 195.36.15 + kernel 2.6.32 + dual cards crashes system

[Bug 548362] Re: nvidia-current 195.36.15 + kernel 2.6.32 + dual cards crashes system

2010-04-30 Thread vincefn
Has anyone encountered this bug with an 32bit (rather than amd64) installation ? -- nvidia-current 195.36.15 + kernel 2.6.32 + dual cards crashes system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548362 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 548362] Re: nvidia-current 195.36.15 + kernel 2.6.32 + dual cards crashes system

2010-04-28 Thread vincefn
This morning I tried the beta drivers 195.36.24 (available from the x-swat ppa), with the same result as before : hard crash with 2.6.32-21+195.36.24, and booting fine using 2.6.31-21+195.36.24... I also updated my bug report on the nvnews forum

[Bug 548362] Re: Cannot install nvidia 195.36.15 - crashes system

2010-04-20 Thread vincefn
Further news... I managed to boot find by installing older kernel 2.6.31-21-generic (from ftp://ftp.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/l/linux/), still with the nvidia-current (195.36.15) package. So far, it seems to work all right - I had a graphic message telling me that nvidia-current had failed

[Bug 548362] Re: nvidia-current 195.36.15 + kernel 2.6.32 + dual cards crashes system

2010-04-20 Thread vincefn
** Summary changed: - Cannot install nvidia 195.36.15 - crashes system + nvidia-current 195.36.15 + kernel 2.6.32 + dual cards crashes system -- nvidia-current 195.36.15 + kernel 2.6.32 + dual cards crashes system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548362 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 548362] Re: nvidia-current 195.36.15 + kernel 2.6.32 + dual cards crashes system

2010-04-20 Thread vincefn
I took the liberty of renaming the bug as it seems not to be an installation issue, but rather a crash at restart around the time X launches, specifically when using dual cards with a 2.6.32+ kernel. I can confirm (after a few hours) the 2.6.31-21 kernel works fine, including CUDA 3.0 computing.

[Bug 548362] Re: nvidia-current 195.36.15 + kernel 2.6.32 + dual cards crashes system

2010-04-20 Thread vincefn
** Tags added: lucid -- nvidia-current 195.36.15 + kernel 2.6.32 + dual cards crashes system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548362 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 567202] Re: Lucid beta 2: Ubuntu no longer boots after installing current NVIDIA driver

2010-04-20 Thread vincefn
I have the same symptoms, which seems to be related to the nVidia driver, the 2.6.32 kernel, and haveing TWO nVidia cards. A workaround is using a 2.6.31 kernel. See the other bug report (maybe should be merged): https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics- drivers/+bug/548362 --

[Bug 548362] Re: nvidia-current 195.36.15 + kernel 2.6.32 + dual cards crashes system

2010-04-20 Thread vincefn
Other similar bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/567202 -- nvidia-current 195.36.15 + kernel 2.6.32 + dual cards crashes system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548362 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 548362] Re: Cannot install nvidia 195.36.15 - crashes system

2010-04-19 Thread vincefn
Hi, I have a similar issue: I am testing Lucid on a PC (amd64) )with two nVidia cards (one 9600GT with two screens attached, and ont GTX295 for CUDA computing). Kubuntu (beta2) installs fine, and works all right with the nouveau driver. Since I need CUDA, I installed nvidia-current

[Bug 343944] Re: Epic plasma memory leak (0.1 mb / sec)

2009-06-18 Thread vincefn
Is there any chance that this will be backported to jaunty ? This is fairly annoying - work a day or 2 in KDE, then you need tolog off and start again... -- Epic plasma memory leak (0.1 mb / sec) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/343944 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 375891] Re: [kubuntu] OpenOffice Impress: Movies do not play

2009-06-15 Thread vincefn
I can confirm this bug (same symptoms) and the proposed solution - adding gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg does allow to play movies in OpenOffice 3.01 (on my up-to-date jaunty 9.04 amd64) It may be good to add gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg as a dependency to openoffice.org-java-common ? -- [kubuntu] OpenOffice

[Bug 375891] Re: [kubuntu] OpenOffice Impress: Movies do not play

2009-06-15 Thread vincefn
Correction- I meant that both gstreamer0.10-plugins-good and gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg are required for video display to work. -- [kubuntu] OpenOffice Impress: Movies do not play https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375891 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 352336] Re: Marvel SAS 6440 not supported, missing mvsas module in kernel

2009-06-04 Thread vincefn
Should this fix allow me to mount a SATA RAID array with this controller? The question is: does the mvsas module actually support hardware raid ? You may want to ask the modules' author. Apparently most people under linux use software raid which is quite good. -- Marvel SAS 6440 not

[Bug 352336] Re: Marvel SAS 6440 not supported, missing mvsas module in kernel

2009-06-04 Thread vincefn
I misread your first message - yes it is defintely beyond the scope of that bug fix, because you want SATA, not SAS. Have you looked at: http://wiki.debian.org/pata_marvell ? Another person (see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/335615) used that paged and managed to see its

[Bug 366300] Re: KDE, Qt, Plasma paint errors, SIGSEGV crashes

2009-05-28 Thread vincefn
I can confirm that bug - I'm using: Jaunty (up-to--date) 2.6.28-12-generic #43-Ubuntu SMP Fri May 1 19:31:32 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux nvidia-180 I also have two monitor on a single card (I have another nvidia card just for number crunching). The strangest thing is that this slow disappearing

[Bug 352336] Re: Marvel SAS 6440 not supported, missing mvsas module in kernel

2009-05-06 Thread vincefn
I can confirm that 2.6.28-12 (which is now in jaunty's proposed- updates) fixes this issue. uname -a Linux gre019099 2.6.28-12-generic #43-Ubuntu SMP Fri May 1 19:31:32 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux find /lib/modules/ -iname *mvsas* /lib/modules/2.6.28-12-generic/kernel/drivers/scsi/mvsas.ko

[Bug 335615] Re: Marvell 88SE6121 not supported

2009-05-06 Thread vincefn
Kernel 2.6.28-12 (which is now in jaunty's proposed-updates) adds support for mvsas: uname -a Linux gre019099 2.6.28-12-generic #43-Ubuntu SMP Fri May 1 19:31:32 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux find /lib/modules/ -iname *mvsas* /lib/modules/2.6.28-12-generic/kernel/drivers/scsi/mvsas.ko See

[Bug 327783] Re: Marvell 88SE6320 SAS-Controller not found!

2009-05-06 Thread vincefn
Kernel 2.6.28-12 (which is now in jaunty's proposed-updates) adds support for mvsas: uname -a Linux gre019099 2.6.28-12-generic #43-Ubuntu SMP Fri May 1 19:31:32 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux find /lib/modules/ -iname *mvsas* /lib/modules/2.6.28-12-generic/kernel/drivers/scsi/mvsas.ko Note

[Bug 352336] [NEW] Marvel SAS 6440 not supported, missing mvsas module in kernel

2009-03-31 Thread vincefn
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic The Serial Attached Scsi (SAS) diver for Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Device 6440 is not included in the kernel. This prevents using SAS disks with Ubuntu jaunty. This driver is included in a number of motherboards (in

[Bug 352336] Re: Marvel SAS 6440 not supported, missing mvsas module in kernel

2009-03-31 Thread vincefn
** Attachment added: dmesg.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24567853/dmesg.log -- Marvel SAS 6440 not supported, missing mvsas module in kernel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352336 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 352336] Re: Marvel SAS 6440 not supported, missing mvsas module in kernel

2009-03-31 Thread vincefn
NB: The issue is the same for the -generic and -server kernels. The -generic is more important to fix as it is used for the installer cd/dvd images. ** Attachment added: proc_version_signature.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24567882/proc_version_signature.log -- Marvel SAS 6440 not

[Bug 352336] Re: Marvel SAS 6440 not supported, missing mvsas module in kernel

2009-03-31 Thread vincefn
** Attachment added: lspci-vvnn.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24567857/lspci-vvnn.log -- Marvel SAS 6440 not supported, missing mvsas module in kernel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352336 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 352336] Re: Marvel SAS 6440 not supported, missing mvsas module in kernel

2009-03-31 Thread vincefn
** Attachment added: uname-a.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24567885/uname-a.log -- Marvel SAS 6440 not supported, missing mvsas module in kernel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352336 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 352336] Re: Marvel SAS 6440 not supported, missing mvsas module in kernel

2009-03-31 Thread vincefn
** Tags added: jaunty kernel marvell sas -- Marvel SAS 6440 not supported, missing mvsas module in kernel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352336 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list