On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 09:27 +0530, Stereotactic wrote:
Is Ubuntu Tweak really required?
It's not really required, most of it is available via gconf-editor.
Why not ship with the enhancements
built in?
AFAIK, most of the enhancements are available by default. You don't
really need Ubuntu
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Vishnoo v...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Or Do you mean include Ubuntu tweak by default?
If you want to know more about why including is not good, there was a
huge discussion why not to use Ubuntu tweak and why it might be harmful
to a new user in the Ubuntu-MOTU
On 03/20/2011 01:17 PM, Nigel Babu wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Vishnoo v...@ubuntu.com
mailto:v...@ubuntu.com wrote:
SNIPPED
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu/2010-August/thread.html
The fun discussion from the last cycle.
Oh, very informative! Thats why Ubuntu
On 03/20/2011 08:45 PM, Stereotactic wrote:
Oh, very informative! Thats why Ubuntu developers are not very keen with
the idea of anything that improves Ubuntu. One more thing. If you look
closely, their only argument against Ubuntu Tweak is lack of security.
So be it. People more knowledgeable
It seems to remind me of Automatix, the all (in) famous script that
automated everything.
Is Ubuntu Tweak really required? Why not ship with the enhancements
built in?
For newbies, Linux Mint has improved on the user interface to a large
extent. Their package management has become better
