Re: [ubuntu-marketing] Making Canonical's/Ubuntu's contributions more visible

2008-09-22 Thread Przemek Kulczycki
2008/8/28 Przemysław Kulczycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > A recent LWN article has picked up the issue of Ubuntu's contributions > to FLOSS: > http://lwn.net/Articles/294542/ > Check it out. > > Also I'm reminding you that the UbuntuContributions page is still open > for additional content: > https://w

Re: [ubuntu-marketing] Making Canonical's/Ubuntu's contributions more visible

2008-08-28 Thread Przemysław Kulczycki
A recent LWN article has picked up the issue of Ubuntu's contributions to FLOSS: http://lwn.net/Articles/294542/ Check it out. Also I'm reminding you that the UbuntuContributions page is still open for additional content: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Website/Content/UbuntuContributions Feel free to add

Re: [ubuntu-marketing] Making Canonical's/Ubuntu's contributions more visible

2008-06-09 Thread Przemysław Kulczycki
Matthew Nuzum pisze: On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:36 AM, Przemysław Kulczycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Now let's get to the point. One of the often accusations against Ubuntu is that it only takes from other projects (Debian, Red Hat, Novell/Suse...) and doesn't give back anything. Ubuntu should

Re: [ubuntu-marketing] Making Canonical's/Ubuntu's contributions more visible

2008-05-24 Thread Matthew Nuzum
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:36 AM, Przemysław Kulczycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Now let's get to the point. >>> One of the often accusations against Ubuntu is that it only takes from >>> other >>> projects (Debian, Red Hat, Novell/Suse...) and doesn't give back >>> anything. >>> Ubuntu should

Re: [ubuntu-marketing] Making Canonical's/Ubuntu's contributions more visible

2008-05-23 Thread Przemysław Kulczycki
Nick Ali pisze: On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Przemysław Kulczycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [disclaimer] I don't know which list is the best to discuss it because there is no specific list for discussing Ubuntu's website, so sorry for the duplication. When the thread expands someone could d

Re: [ubuntu-marketing] Making Canonical's/Ubuntu's contributions more visible

2008-05-19 Thread Nick Ali
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Przemysław Kulczycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [disclaimer] > I don't know which list is the best to discuss it because there is no > specific list for discussing Ubuntu's website, so sorry for the duplication. > When the thread expands someone could decide to ke

[ubuntu-marketing] Making Canonical's/Ubuntu's contributions more visible

2008-05-19 Thread Przemysław Kulczycki
[disclaimer] I don't know which list is the best to discuss it because there is no specific list for discussing Ubuntu's website, so sorry for the duplication. When the thread expands someone could decide to keep it on only one list. Now let's get to the point. One of the often accusations ag