Dominik Wagenfuehr schrieb:
> We have even need to post a clarification
> on ubuntuusers.de because some users thought that the Ubuntu servers
> with the Ubuntu packages were hacked. So a statement would be good...
There has been an update on Linux Today [1] from Gerry Carr with an
official (?
N Ali wrote:
> On 8/16/07, Martin Albisetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 8/16/07, Matthew East <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> What do people think? Can bad publicity can be turned into good
>>> publicity?
>>>
>>
>> I personally believe that a nice article (the fridge sounds
>> right) wit
Martin Albisetti wrote:
> On 8/16/07, Matthew East <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> What do people think? Can bad publicity can be turned into good publicity?
>>
>
> I personally believe that a nice article (the fridge sounds right)
> with what will be done to prevent this in the future would suff
Dominik Wagenfuehr wrote:
[...]
> TheInquirer
> [8]. (Last one is ridiculous... Saying "Cannonical" and "Open sauce
> software"...)
This is clearly ridicule, which also makes interesting reading for some.
Most publicity, even bad publicity, is probably 'good' publicity,
however, being vulner
On 8/16/07, Martin Albisetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/16/07, Matthew East <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > What do people think? Can bad publicity can be turned into good publicity?
> >
>
> I personally believe that a nice article (the fridge sounds right)
> with what will be done to pre
Hi Dominik,
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 06:07:27PM +0200, Dominik Wagenfuehr wrote:
> Here are further news for it: eWeek.com [6], Slashdot [7], TheInquirer
> [8]. (Last one is ridiculous... Saying "Cannonical" and "Open sauce
> software"...)
>
Knowing the Inq, I suspect that's intentional! :)
>
>
> This is a good point I've seen it on digg, and even on Planet Ubuntu Users?
> In every case it's been very negative.
>
In Germany all of the big news websites (heise [1], Golem [2] and
Pro-Linux [3]) has mentioned the issue. Some sites like winfuture [4]
also mentioned that Canonical is bl
On 8/16/07, Matthew East <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What do people think? Can bad publicity can be turned into good publicity?
>
I personally believe that a nice article (the fridge sounds right)
with what will be done to prevent this in the future would suffice.
Security breaches happen every
This is a good point I've seen it on digg, and even on Planet Ubuntu
Users?
In every case it's been very negative.
"Matthew East" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
08/16/2007 09:28 AM
To
"Ubuntu Marketing"
cc
Subject
[ubuntu-marketi
Hi all,
(Jono and Matthew cc:ed)
A thread on the -uk list has highlighted the recent poor publicity
that Ubuntu has had as a result of the recent problems with the local
community run servers, in particular on slashdot
(http://it.slashdot.org/it/07/08/15/1341224.shtml).
Does the marketing team h
10 matches
Mail list logo