On Wednesday 19 December 2007 23:57:29 Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> Why do you believe this is a security hole?
Quotation from the Xwrapper.conf man page (man 5 Xwrapper.config)
<>
So, it means that anybody, including a process without console, can start the
X server. The target for UME is mobile de
2.6.24 Kernel Support
=
Alek continues to port the patches from 2.6.22 to 2.6.24. He is
using/referencing the work previously done by Amit.
PSB / SLT HW Support
Jacob still owes me a patch to work around the MWAIT/local APIC timer
issue. We decided to go wi
* Peter Antoniac
| It didn't hit :) so it might be a bug. But even if it is a bug, the problem
| still remains: you have allowed_users=anybody into the Xwrapper.config. If
| you use my patch for the /etc/event.d/session then you we don't need to open
| this security hole in Xwrapper.config...
On Wednesday 19 December 2007 16:35:45 Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Peter Antoniac
> : [EMAIL PROTECTED] /tmp/ume-config-common-0.7 > tail -n 6 debian/postinst
>
> # Ew
> if [ -f /etc/X11/Xwrapper.config ]; then
> sed -i -e 's/allowed_users=.*/allowed_users=anybody/'
> /etc/X11/Xwrapper.config fi
Actually, if you are using the menlow image and having issues, its
because the image is installing the mccaslin kernel as the default boot
kernel, which doesn't have the kernel modules for the menlow graphics.
I wrote about this issue a while back. The image should not be loading
the lpiacompat ke
Hi,
I'm in holidays starting tonight; please contact me if you need
anything done today or which I should arrange to do in holidays while I
still have Internet access.
* Commented on misc ongoing discussions
* Uploaded hildon-desktop with patch by Horace Li; should solve
hildon-des
* Peter Antoniac
| On Wednesday 19 December 2007 16:04:34 Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
| > Is there any particular reason why you don't seem to be using
| > ume-config-common?
|
| I am using that. But that has nothing to do with what I said. The
| problem is when you install the UME on a real device.
On Wednesday 19 December 2007 16:04:34 Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> Is there any particular reason why you don't seem to be using
> ume-config-common?
I am using that. But that has nothing to do with what I said. The problem is
when you install the UME on a real device. Probably you are talking about
* Peter Antoniac
| I don't know if anybody had noticed, but there are some issues with the
| event.d scripts that are supposed to start the X on UME.
|
| The problem is that unless you change the /etc/X11/Xwrapper.config
| there is no way the X is going to start on the machine. This is
| becaus
Dear Rusty and all,
I don't know if anybody had noticed, but there are some issues with the
event.d scripts that are supposed to start the X on UME.
The problem is that unless you change the /etc/X11/Xwrapper.config there is no
way the X is going to start on the machine. This is because the way
10 matches
Mail list logo
