Re: Virtual packages?

> Am Sun, 12 Nov 2006 01:42:41 +0100 schrieb Jan Claeys: > > > This is explained in the 'debian-policy' document: > > On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 11:24:38AM +0100, Andreas Volz wrote: > Ok, I looked into > > http://www.debian.org

Re: More Teams, more MLs, more more more

On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 04:50:38PM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote: > Hi, Hi Stephan, > On Saturday 11 November 2006 23:10, Daniel T. Chen wrote: > > Ming Hua wrote: > > > > > > I care about stable updates a lot, and while I am not confident to be in > > > the MOTU-SRU team, I would be happy to be i

Re: More Teams, more MLs, more more more

Stephan Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Why can't we go back to the "old" times of KISS (Keep it simple and stupid) > so > that everybody can understand what we are doing and can help us? We don't introduce burocracy because of having burocracy. We introduce it because we want to ensure s

More Teams, more MLs, more more more (was Re: Stable Release Updates policy)

Hi, On Saturday 11 November 2006 23:10, Daniel T. Chen wrote: > Ming Hua wrote: > > I have another idea -- what about forming another team to act as > > MOTU-SRU bug triagers? This team should be (automatically?) set as bug > > contact for all SRUed packages, and look at the bug reports, then > >

Re: Virtual packages?

On 2006-11-12 11:24:38 +0100, Andreas Volz wrote: > Ok, I looked into > > http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/virtual-package-names-list.txt > > but found no virtual package for glut. So what is the exact name for > the virtual glut package and how could I get a recent list? Looking thro

Re: Virtual packages?

Am Sun, 12 Nov 2006 01:42:41 +0100 schrieb Jan Claeys: > Op zaterdag 11-11-2006 om 23:44 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Andreas > Volz: > > in Gentoo it's possible to use virtual packages if multiple packages > > with the same features are available. For example glut vs. > > freeglut. I could use v