On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 08:28:27AM +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote:
>The next MOTU Meeting is scheduled for Saturday, July 14th, 0:00 UTC.
The meeting minutes are now available at:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Meetings/2007-07-14
Following is the text version of the minutes:
MOTU Meeting on U
On 7/14/07, Jordan Mantha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Other people's merges? Nobody "owns" anything in MOTU. We are a team. We
> take care of Universe and whatever needs to be done. MOTU is the
> maintainer, not individuals. If a merge is decently documented then there
> should be *no* problem wit
On Saturday 14 July 2007 00:35, Jordan Mantha wrote:
> On Fri Jul 13, 2007 at 11:09:11PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Friday 13 July 2007 22:47, Andy Price wrote:
>
>
>
> > Right. That's not the problem we've had though. The problem we've had
> > is people doing merges right away without
Hello all,
I propose to you to include Subclipse inside the Ubuntu packaging pool.
I already wrote a working package which was successfully installed on a
Feisty.
You could download it at:
http://www.arakhne.org/packages/pool/eclipse-plugin-subclipse/
Perhaps you can use it as a basis for your
On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 18:12 +1000, Sarah Hobbs wrote:
> [snip]
>- Use debcheck instead.
>- Debcheck needs to be modified for Ubuntu. The source is currently
> in debian's qa cvs repository. Any volunteers?
> [snip]
I've got debcheck running over Ubuntu (every 6 hours at the moment,
thoug
On Fri Jul 13, 2007 at 11:09:11PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Friday 13 July 2007 22:47, Andy Price wrote:
> Right. That's not the problem we've had though. The problem we've had is
> people doing merges right away without bothering to check at all. I've also
> personally experienced
On 7/14/07, Andy Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At the MOTU meeting today it was mentioned that we look into the merges
> process. I'm specifically looking into how best to streamline the part
> of the process where mergers "ping" the previous uploaders to check it's
> OK to merge the package.
On Friday 13 July 2007 22:47, Andy Price wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> At the MOTU meeting today it was mentioned that we look into the merges
> process. I'm specifically looking into how best to streamline the part
> of the process where mergers "ping" the previous uploaders to check it's
> OK to merge t
Hi folks,
At the MOTU meeting today it was mentioned that we look into the merges
process. I'm specifically looking into how best to streamline the part
of the process where mergers "ping" the previous uploaders to check it's
OK to merge the package. The clear problem case here is when the
previou
NEW: opencryptoki_2.2.4.1.dfsg.orig.tar.gz
NEW: opencryptoki_2.2.4.1.dfsg-0ubuntu2.diff.gz
NEW: opencryptoki_2.2.4.1.dfsg-0ubuntu2.dsc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 10:57:27 -0300
Source: opencryptoki
Binary: opencryptoki libopencryptoki libopenc
10 matches
Mail list logo
