Re: Future of REVU and Debian Mentors

On 7/29/07, Scott Kitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was recently subscribed to the debian-mentors mail list (working on getting > a package uploaded to Debian) and discovered that the author of the Debian > Mentors system is getting ready to overhaul that system. > > That got me thinking...

Next MOTU meeting.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi folks A reminder that the next MOTU meeting will be on Friday, August 10, 2007, at 04:00 UTC. If you have anything to discuss at the meeting, please add a summary of the discussion, along with your name, to the meeting agenda, at the below URL: h

REVU days are now every Monday.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey folks. As you may have seen in the recent MOTU meeting minutes, we decided to make REVU days every Monday. This ensures that there is no confusion as to when attention should be given to REVU, and gives package uploaders a clear idea of when the

Future of REVU and Debian Mentors

I was recently subscribed to the debian-mentors mail list (working on getting a package uploaded to Debian) and discovered that the author of the Debian Mentors system is getting ready to overhaul that system. That got me thinking... Why do REVU an mentors need to be separate? Except for versi

Ubuntu MOTU Meeting Minutes, for July 27 2007, at 0:00 UTC.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey folks. Please find below, a copy of the MOTU meeting minutes, for July 27 2007, at 0:00 UTC. These can also be found on the wiki, at the below URL: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Meetings/2007-07-27 If you have any queries about these minutes, or t

Re: MOTU meeting, and SRU discussion clarrification needed.

On 7/30/07, Luke Yelavich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > COuld anybody who attended the last MOTU meeting please summarise for me > what was decided in the SRU discussion we had? From the agenda and log, > I still can't quite work out what we were actually talking about, and > what was decided. Reply

MOTU meeting, and SRU discussion clarrification needed.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey folks. COuld anybody who attended the last MOTU meeting please summarise for me what was decided in the SRU discussion we had? From the agenda and log, I still can't quite work out what we were actually talking about, and what was decided. Reply

[Fwd: kitsune_2.0-0ubuntu1_source.changes is NEW]

--- Begin Message --- NEW: kitsune_2.0.orig.tar.gz NEW: kitsune_2.0-0ubuntu1.diff.gz NEW: kitsune_2.0-0ubuntu1.dsc -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 18:05:54 +0200 Source: kitsune Binary: kitsune Architecture: source Version: 2.0-0ubuntu1 Distributio

Re: Mumble wants a package maintainer...

On Sunday 29 July 2007 10:32:29 Reinhard Tartler wrote: > "Michael D. Stemle, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I'm not on this list, so in any replies be sure to CC me. > > > > I've been in contact with a project called "mumble" which--as far as I > > can tell--is a Qt-based talk server like te

Help with research on Ubuntu community

My name is Andria Karaolia and i am a postgraduate student at Lancaster University. I am doing the MSc in Information Technology, Management and Organisational Change. Currently i am doing my dissertation with title: Online Communities of Practice: "The role of narratives in knowledge sharing". Th

Mumble wants a package maintainer...

I'm not on this list, so in any replies be sure to CC me. I've been in contact with a project called "mumble" which--as far as I can tell--is a Qt-based talk server like teamspeak. They have both a server and a client, and seem very eager to have their project included in the Ubuntu Universe.