On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 22:10 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 June 2008 21:11, Nicolas Valcarcel wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 5:52 AM, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > > There's a wiki page on
> > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/PatchTaggingGuideli
On Tuesday 17 June 2008 21:11, Nicolas Valcarcel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 5:52 AM, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > There's a wiki page on
> > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/PatchTaggingGuidelines about
> > basically the same thing (it documents the changes in the
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 5:52 AM, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As you might have read in [1], I worked on exporting more info about
> packages in Ubuntu to the Debian infrastructure, specifically the Debian
> PTS[2] and the Debian Developer Packages Overview[3].
>
> [1]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 09:59:04PM EST, Stefan Potyra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Samstag 14 Juni 2008 00:29:16 schrieb Stefan Potyra:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I'd like to ask you how we want to proceed with the motu-release team.
> >
> > Keep the team as is for
Hello Ubuntu Lovers,
This Thursday 19 of June you need to be ready to squash some bugs
because we'll be celebrating a GNOME Power Manager Hug Day!,
our goal is to deal with all of the bugs on this list:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20080619
Who can join the Hug Day? Everyone. You don
On Tuesday 17 June 2008 11:33, Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
> Excellent proposal!
>
> > 2. MOTU discuss on the ML.
> >
> >
> > 5. More discussion on the ML the selected person tries to guage
> > the rough
> > consensus of the group.
>
> Personally, I find it difficult to gauge concensus from a ML deb
Excellent proposal!
2. MOTU discuss on the ML.
5. More discussion on the ML the selected person tries to guage
the rough
consensus of the group.
Personally, I find it difficult to gauge concensus from a ML debate,
especially if it's heated. Often, such a discussion tends to
dissipa
Hi,
Am Dienstag 17 Juni 2008 16:32:15 schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
> Scott Kitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I think we should have some discussions on goals for this release.
> >
> > I'll start with:
> >
> > 1. Finish python-xml transition and get it out of the archive.
> > 2. Kill off lib
On Tuesday 17 June 2008 13:59:04 Stefan Potyra wrote:
> since there has been no response so far, let's try the other way round:
> Cesare, Luke, Sarah, Scott: Are you up for intrepid as well?
If there is somebody else that wants to step in I'll be happy to stand aside,
otherwise I´ll be happy to
Scott Kitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think we should have some discussions on goals for this release.
>
> I'll start with:
>
> 1. Finish python-xml transition and get it out of the archive.
> 2. Kill off libdb versions prior to 4.6.
3. track and process the ffmpeg transition!
--
Gr
On Tuesday 17 June 2008 08:51, Emmet Hikory wrote:
> Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > I think the last rule can or should imply that the council has the
> > option to call for vote.
> >
> > The shepard always has the possibilty to recommend a vote to the
> > council. If that is the case, the council wou
Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> I think the last rule can or should imply that the council has the
> option to call for vote.
>
> The shepard always has the possibilty to recommend a vote to the
> council. If that is the case, the council would kinda have to call for
> votes, or at least have a very good
On Tuesday 17 June 2008 07:59, Stefan Potyra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Samstag 14 Juni 2008 00:29:16 schrieb Stefan Potyra:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I'd like to ask you how we want to proceed with the motu-release team.
> >
> > Keep the team as is for intrepid, or do a new call for applicants or
> > s.th. e
Hi,
Am Samstag 14 Juni 2008 00:29:16 schrieb Stefan Potyra:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'd like to ask you how we want to proceed with the motu-release team.
>
> Keep the team as is for intrepid, or do a new call for applicants or s.th.
> else?
since there has been no response so far, let's try the other wa
First words from my side, excellent proposal!
Stefan Potyra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> If a process or policy is needed, my proposal would work something like
>> this:
>>
>> 1. Someone makes an announcement to the MOTU ML describing the problem and
>> the proposed solution (much like this m
Hi,
As you might have read in [1], I worked on exporting more info about
packages in Ubuntu to the Debian infrastructure, specifically the Debian
PTS[2] and the Debian Developer Packages Overview[3].
[1] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/blog/?p=295
[2] http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/dpkg.html
[3] h
Hi,
thanks Scott, for bringing this up!
Am Montag 16 Juni 2008 21:47:16 schrieb Scott Kitterman:
> It has seemed to me for some time that making decisions about process and
> policy changes at MOTU meetings based on votes of those present is not
> serving us particularly well. The major problems
Hi,
Here, just a minor patch on unicorn sources, working with
"2.6.24-16-generic" kernel on hardy heron (8.04 LTS)
I have an issue with ATM module (which seems not to be loaded), but to
patch unicorn_pcidrv.c will allow to build unicorn_pci_atm module under
this kernel (and later) and provi
Moins,
+1 from me.
[...]
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
19 matches
Mail list logo
