On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:17:35 -0400
Scott Kitterman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Based on:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2008-April/025259.html
One might think it's now, but I propose this not start until the last
week before release (i.e. one more week from now).
+1, one
Hi,
On Thursday 16 October 2008 12:33:51 Cesare Tirabassi wrote:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:17:35 -0400
Scott Kitterman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Based on:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2008-April/025259.html
One might think it's now, but I propose this not start until
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:41:53 +0200 Stefan Potyra
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday 16 October 2008 12:33:51 Cesare Tirabassi wrote:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:17:35 -0400
Scott Kitterman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Based on:
Scott Kitterman ha scritto:
Based on:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2008-April/025259.html
One might think it's now, but I propose this not start until the last week
before release (i.e. one more week from now).
My opinion:
I think uploads which does not require a FFe
Based on:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2008-April/025259.html
One might think it's now, but I propose this not start until the last week
before release (i.e. one more week from now).
Comments (particularly from motu-release, but others welcome)?
Scott K
--
Ubuntu-motu
Hi again,
On Thursday 16 October 2008 12:41:53 Stefan Potyra wrote:
[..]
Would it be even possible to set universe/multiverse back to auto until
that time?
wgrant sistpoty|work: Launchpad provides no facility to freeze just some
components.
Cheers,
Stefan.
signature.asc
Description:
Hi Steffen,
Steffen Ullrich [2008-09-22 22:31 +0200]:
I'm the author and maintainer of the Net::SIP perl module.
You ship with hardy a version 0.39, which isn't the newest.
In the mean time a lot of bugs got fixed so that it would
be a good idea to update it.
Intrepid has newer versions of
Hi Stefan,
sorry for the *really* long delay...
Stefan Potyra [2008-06-01 4:15 +0200]:
Moving the source package to universe and put mencoder into multiverse
isn't probably possible either: I didn't check if mplayer has some
build-depends from multiverse (which would prevent putting
Hi MOTUs,
Pedro Villavicencio has been reorganizing and cleaning up
http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs and we would like some feedback from the
MOTU community on how these pages are shaping up. The goal is to
simplify the documentation so that it is obvious on what page you need
to click on to do a
Hello,
Currently [0] requests for new packages are done on Launchpad and they
are not allowed on Brainstorm. However, I think that this situation is
not optimal as there's no good way to know how many people are
interested in a package * and so if someone wants to package one of
those requested
On Thursday 16 October 2008 13:29, Siegfried Gevatter (RainCT) wrote:
Hello,
Currently [0] requests for new packages are done on Launchpad and they
are not allowed on Brainstorm. However, I think that this situation is
not optimal as there's no good way to know how many people are
interested
(Forwarding from brainstorm-moderators@ to ubuntu-motu@)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Aidan w [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/10/16
Subject: Re: [Brainstorm-moderators] Using Brainstorm for packaging requests
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Great idea +1
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
2008/10/16 Kami ROUSSEAU [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Packaging request could be located in a different ideatorrent subdomain.
Yeah, or perhaps just a new category would be enough (after all, there
aren't that many packaging requests, or?).
--
Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals (RainCT)
Ubuntu Developer.
On Thursday 16 October 2008 14:39, Siegfried Gevatter (RainCT) wrote:
Thanks for your replies so far!
2008/10/16 Saïvann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This way, brainstorm could be used for visibility purpose, discussion
and to measure popularity. Launchpad can be used for collaboration and
work on
2008/10/16 Scott Kitterman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If we go this way, we should reconsider requiring needs-packaging bugs at all.
Last I checked these bugs didn't get auto-closed because the bug wasn't
assigned to the (non-existant until upload) package.
Hm, right, that makes sense. Usually only
I agree with RainCT that brainstorm might be a very interesting way to
measure how many people are interested by new packages.
However, IMO, Launchpad is still the right place to consider packaging
requests because it also needs to be reviewed for many reasons :
- dependencies and libraries
-
Thanks for your replies so far!
2008/10/16 Saïvann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This way, brainstorm could be used for visibility purpose, discussion
and to measure popularity. Launchpad can be used for collaboration and
work on the package itself.
Perhaps I haven't expressed it clearly enough, but
Hello everyone,
It's getting close to that time of the year again, where we celebrate
a new Ubuntu release and be merry. However, the drive for more
awesomeness never ceases at Ubuntu, and we'd like to kick off the
planning for the next Ubuntu OpenWeek. If you're unfamiliar with
OpenWeek
Packaging request could be located in a different ideatorrent subdomain.
Yeah, or perhaps just a new category would be enough (after all, there
aren't that many packaging requests, or?).
I would also opt for a packaging request category instead of a complete
sub-domain, unless
Thanks for your replies so far!
2008/10/16 Saïvann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This way, brainstorm could be used for visibility purpose, discussion
and to measure popularity. Launchpad can be used for collaboration and
work on the package itself.
Perhaps I haven't expressed it clearly
20 matches
Mail list logo
