For the record, this affects hardy and below (although not
hardy-backports). Presumably the universe security team will get onto
this relatively soon - especially if they have a bug to track it.
Hobbsee
the.soylent wrote:
>
>
>
> hi again,
> still not fixed!
>
> /soylent
>
> Origin
On Sunday 02 November 2008 23:45, Darrell Enix wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 11:36 PM, Scott Kitterman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > On Sunday 02 November 2008 22:45, Darrell Enix wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Scott Kitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >wrote:
> > > > On Sunday
On Sunday 02 November 2008 22:45, Darrell Enix wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Scott Kitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > On Sunday 02 November 2008 20:43, Darrell Enix wrote:
> > > Does anyone know if or when the version of Dansguardian in Ubuntu will
> > > be updated to a newer versio
It can be installed on Ubuntu server with apt-get.
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Scott Kitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Sunday 02 November 2008 20:43, Darrell Enix wrote:
> > Does anyone know if or when the version of Dansguardian in Ubuntu will be
> > updated to a newer version? I'm l
On Sunday 02 November 2008 20:43, Darrell Enix wrote:
> Does anyone know if or when the version of Dansguardian in Ubuntu will be
> updated to a newer version? I'm looking to get a version that supports
> NTLM logon.
What version does that first appear in?
Scott K
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Does anyone know if or when the version of Dansguardian in Ubuntu will be
updated to a newer version? I'm looking to get a version that supports NTLM
logon.
--
Ubuntu-motu mailing list
Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubunt
Talking on IRC, I think a good comprise is limiting direct uploads to
REVU to those with Ubuntu Universe Contributor. The reasoning behind
this is that someone who has UUC is more likely to stick around, and
know who to ask to help get sponsors and the packaging is less likely
to require hand holdi
> I believe there are many in the Ubuntu community that feel more
> comfortable setting up packages for inclusion in Ubuntu as opposed
> to Debian, but that may be because they just aren't really aware of
> the Debian process.
Yes, I think this is a major issue. Ubuntu just feels much friendlier
t
I think that as much as possible, we need to try to get packages into
Debian. Not only are we contributing back into their repositories, but as
James said, we make our lives much easier. I believe there are many in the
Ubuntu community that feel more comfortable setting up packages for
inclusion in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi again,
still not fixed!
/soylent
- Original-Nachricht
Betreff: fyi: (adobe)flash-vulnerabilities
Datum: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:27:32 +0200
Von: the.soylent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com
hello,
please have
Dear ubuntu-motu,
It's OK, after some trial and error I have located my keepass database. What
confused me was that KeepassX did not automatically add the .kdb extension to
the database file.
Everything's OK now.
Thanks a lot anyway and kindest regards,
Steve Lander
Original Message -
Hi!
Just did an apt-get on synfigstudio, trying to start it yields a crash:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ synfigstudio
synfig studio -- starting up application...
(synfigstudio:7234): Gtk-WARNING **: GtkSpinButton: setting an adjustment
with non-zero page size is deprecated
(synfigstudio:7234): Gtk-
hello,
please, witch rom(s) and file(s) should i copy where.
on the ftp://ftp.apple.asimov.net/pub/apple_II/images/ are chaos.
tell me if you need more information about my installed system.
i use gutsy, gnome, geforce FX 5500, pentium III (tualatin).
i want to program assembler and basic like
hello,
please, witch rom(s) and file(s) should i copy where.
on the ftp://ftp.apple.asimov.net/pub/apple_II/images/ are chaos.
tell me if you need more information about my installed system.
i use gutsy, gnome, geforce FX 5500, pentium III (tualatin).
i want to program assembler and basic like
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 18:49 +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> I think this proposal is even more agressive and unfriendly to
> newcomers
> than Siegfried's original one.
>
> I translate it as: "We're sorry but we do not care about your package
> this time. Please try again next time, we'll see if w
James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I had another idea after my last mail: only open REVU for part of the
> cycle.
I think this proposal is even more agressive and unfriendly to newcomers
than Siegfried's original one.
I translate it as: "We're sorry but we do not care about your package
On Sun, 02 Nov 2008 15:39:46 + James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 09:56 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 09:42:46 + Kasper Peeters
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> I'm pondering on running a script to move all those which don't have
>> >>
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 14:54 +0100, Siegfried-Angel wrote:
> 2008/11/2 Siegfried-Angel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > 2008/11/2 James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> Instead of distracting them with a small change to the changelog, why
> >> not explain the situation more clearly and accurately? For all p
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 09:56 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 09:42:46 + Kasper Peeters
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I'm pondering on running a script to move all those which don't have
> >> "jaunty" in debian/copyright to the "Needs work" section, leaving a
> >> comment
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 09:42:46 + Kasper Peeters
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm pondering on running a script to move all those which don't have
>> "jaunty" in debian/copyright to the "Needs work" section, leaving a
>> comment asking to change it to "jaunty", check the standards version
>> and
2008/11/2 Siegfried-Angel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/11/2 James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Instead of distracting them with a small change to the changelog, why
>> not explain the situation more clearly and accurately? For all packages
>> older than 6 (?) months archive the package [..]
>
> He
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 08:43 +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > If you are concerned about a large number of items in the list then we
> > should consider expiration, but I don't think this is the right way to
> > do it.
> > [...]
> > It does give a bad
> I'm pondering on running a script to move all those which don't have
> "jaunty" in debian/copyright to the "Needs work" section, leaving a
> comment asking to change it to "jaunty", check the standards version
> and some general recommendations (or perhaps just a link to a new wiki
> page), so th
James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you are concerned about a large number of items in the list then we
> should consider expiration, but I don't think this is the right way to
> do it.
> [...]
> It does give a bad impression to new contributors though, as they may
> not understand why t
24 matches
Mail list logo
