Wow, nice. Some comments from having a quick look at it:
- It'd add a statement saying that changes on LP staging will be lost
(people may do something useful and the get annoyed that it got
deleted).
- I don't think that the translation exercise is a good idea. There
are several language
On 24/01/2009, at 05.44, Marcelo Boveto Shima wrote:
I have been maintainining the FreeNX complete suite for at least 2
years
and now I uploaded it to revu.
I've reviewed this package when it was uploaded under the name nx
and before it was split.
In the comments, I asked you to clarify
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Kjeldgaard Morten m...@bioxray.au.dkwrote:
On 24/01/2009, at 05.44, Marcelo Boveto Shima wrote:
I have been maintainining the FreeNX complete suite for at least 2 years
and now I uploaded it to revu.
I've reviewed this package when it was uploaded under
NEW: plasmoid-windowslist_0.3.orig.tar.gz
NEW: plasmoid-windowslist_0.3-0ubuntu1.diff.gz
NEW: plasmoid-windowslist_0.3-0ubuntu1.dsc
plasmoid-windowslist (0.3-0ubuntu1) jaunty; urgency=low
* Initial release (LP: #316583)
* Added cmake-find-plasma.patch in order to work with new libplasma-dev
I have written up a proposal for an updated workflow for our REVU,
please see:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/REVUWorkflowProposal .
The proposal is not wildly different from what we have now, it is more
of a re-structuring. I think it can be implemented with quite few
modfications to the
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 21:20:19 +0100 Morten Kjeldgaard m...@bioxray.au.dk
wrote:
I have written up a proposal for an updated workflow for our REVU,
please see:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/REVUWorkflowProposal .
The proposal is not wildly different from what we have now, it is more
of a
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 21:20:19 +0100 Morten Kjeldgaard m...@bioxray.au.dk
wrote:
I have written up a proposal for an updated workflow for our REVU,
please see:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/REVUWorkflowProposal .
The proposal is not wildly different from what we have now, it is more
of a
