On 2009-02-21 20:52:47 +0100, Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
Oh, I didn't make it quite clear: I imagine that packages uploaded to
the PPA would be the ones that passed reviewing with 2 advocates. So
essentially, these package would be in a state ready for upload to
Ubuntu's archive. I agree
On 22/02/2009, at 12.47, Michael Bienia wrote:
On 2009-02-21 20:52:47 +0100, Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
Oh, I didn't make it quite clear: I imagine that packages uploaded to
the PPA would be the ones that passed reviewing with 2 advocates. So
essentially, these package would be in a state
On 22/02/2009, at 04.45, Stefan Potyra wrote:
hm... not too sure: Just adding *all* packages on revu to my pbuilder
environment is something which I feel uncomfortable with.
Personally, I use
mini-dinstall for this task, because it lets me explicitely select
which
package I want to be
The current version of btrfs-tools in jaunty is 0.16, which is
incompatible with BTRFS in 2.6.29 (when it's released in ~3 weeks).
Chris Mason may perform a standalone, unsupported BTRFS release for
2.6.28, so developers will be able to build this against jaunty's
stock kernel also.
Both of these
Daniel J Blueman wrote:
The current version of btrfs-tools in jaunty is 0.16
i'm not involved in ubuntu, do not cc me, thanks.
http://people.debian.org/~daniel/documents/ubuntu.html
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:
